Armored Cars

>inb4 muh freedums shitstorm

>they seem to think they can keep it in London
are they planning to live in it or something?

It's the car bombs you worry about, pom. Forget the Troubles already?

> Car bombs
Easily defeated by roadworks. Surprising how many irishmen are terrified of traffic jams.
The bombs in clothing stores are what nearly killed me by causality. Someone planted one in the store my mother worked at in the 70s, but it got spotted and defused.

>are they planning to live in it or something?
Being able to live in it would require it being registered as a residential vehicle, which would be incredibly expensive.
I think the plan is 'keep it in a field', or 'move out of Greater London'.

And you need an HGV license to drive the thing on the road, too, so I think they're just nuts.

you are a nothing, a loser, a nobody

no one is going to waste time and money in an attempt to kill your retard ass

if someone really wanted to kill you they would wait until you got home and kill you

yes, I've been looking at picking up a Ferret Mk.2

>Ridiculously big thing, and they seem to think they can keep it in London.
why not? My grandparents said that if I ever get a T-55 I can just send it to the UK and keep it in their back garden in Morden

Learn to read you retard, he clearly stated that they shoot into random traffic

I drove an armored G wagon. If you think a regular G wagon drives like shit, just wait until you drive an armored one.

>Anyone ever thought of getting an armored car?
You use that term too casually. You mean partially-armored car. A normal armored car is $250K to $800K each beyond the price of the car being modded. They really take it apart and add support rails for the extra weight. It's basically taking the car apart and reassembling it again. It can't be less than 250K and you'd agree if you saw a video of how even an armored mercedes is made.

For consumers, a partially-armored car is affordable. There's no need to armor the bottom of the car. But you're still looking at $50K since the door frames have to be strengthened for the weight of the windows and armored doors. The remade door to hold the thick windows is pretty heavy.

>Drive by shootings happen all the time, and dindu's and Mexican's just shoot into traffic
>That's why they call it chiraq

CHIRAQ (chicago illinois, home city of obama) has stunning amounts of violence. Ignoring the non-death stabbings and shootings, more Americans have been murdered in Chicago in the last 15 years than have died in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. If you add the non-death stabbings and non-death shootings, then obviously the number goes up. How safe are you when mugged? It's easier for them to slice across your eyes to blind you so you don't ID them later.

The University of Chicago "Great Cities Initiative" study in 2014 shows 47 percent of black men from the ages of 20 and 24 were out of school and unemployed in 2014. Meanwhile, only 7 percent of white men and women in that age group were jobless and out of school.

Is the difference in Chiraq automobile servicing employment due to racism or due to jobs having skill requirements? If all life was equal, then a man who tortured people to death and be put in one electric chair and George Washington in another, and then make the latter decide which of them should die.

> If all life was equal, then a man who tortured people to death and be put in one electric chair and George Washington in another, and then make the latter decide which of them should die.

What

Much of Chiraqs probs are blamed on equality of treatment issues. Thus, it is claimed by activists it is unfair to statistically treat a group of violent people and a group made of george washington types differently from each other. They didn't say it that way, but that is how it can be interpreted to make their points clearer.

That's because the statistics of both groups are caused by the actions of the individuals in both groups. Because stats make not only performance, but criminal events stand out, the activists keep trying to label people using stats as guilty of racial profiling or discriminatory tactics. So, with that belief and the reflexive law of equality, choosing between ghetto man or george washington should be done with dice instead of personal choice. Both were guilty of violently disturbing the peace.

>Much of Chiraqs probs are blamed on equality of treatment issues
Bullshit.

what kind of authoritarian bullshit did I just read?

lol fuck off trip fag
Does making fun of people on the internet make you feel like a BIG TOUGH GUY?

I bet you dont even care when you curb your wheels.

Move.

There was an user a few years ago with an armored 7 series. Imagine the reliability when it weighs an extra ton.

I would really, really, really like a Knight XV.

>Anyone ever thought of getting an armored car?

Why bother? In a tough place like Chicago, it will be stolen from you and re-purposed.

only if i run some sort of security company. otherwise no.

Read more carefully. It is "blamed" and not "actual cause". The minority groups and activists use "blame" because the actual causes (intrinsic lower IQ, intrinsic more violent personality, intrinsic short term goal seeking) is something they've always avoided discussing.

Uncalled for.

Have you ever realized how incredibly dumb it is that most of these liberals love to ride sciences dick (but don't want to actually learn the details - that's hard) and we're celebrating evolution yet the moment it comes to human beings that for most of history have developed as pretty much separated populations with limited flow between the groups are all born perfectly identical and rather than having criteria that looks at a person as an individual want law to forcibly pick certain demographics to create a distribution that makes them feel good rather than allowing ability to pick who gets uni/film/awards/grants/etc

Are you actually retarded? Like it's not often I come across a post and think somebody actual has some form of retardation

Is the idea of tabula rasa a foreign concept to you or something.

have you ever realised how to use a sentence

Their intellectual dishonest in the use of cherry picked scientific data is a testimony to their disingenuousness. Emperical data is only considered truly objective when it substantiates their ideals and never questioned or scrutinize. Conversely, incongruous findings are ignored, dismissed, or discredited (pic related for example).

All this is done to assuage their own cognitive dissonance. It's racist to say that the average intelligence of certain ethnicities are greater/lower than those of another ethnicity, yet offering minority only scholarships and admission into colleges for which they aren't qualified isn't racist. Equality and the fight against discrimination are their rational, ignorant or incredulous to the fact that positive discrimination is still discrimination.

How can corporate and academic equality truly be achieved through federally mandated diversity quotas rather than meritocracy? Fighting discrimination with discrimination is like trying to extinguish a fire with kindling. It won't work, but you can still tell everyone that you tried.

His grammar is god awful but he makes a point. What he's saying is they want everyone equal when everyone can't be equal. The accept survival of the fittest in all places but within the human species

In the parking lots at my city's main shopping mall / plaza district, there are tons of malls and plazas co-located next to each other and lots of parking lots. Walking through the parking garages is not illegal. One mall tried to put signs up saying no trespassing only patrons with cars may enter, but racial activists sued saying that was discriminatory and they won. So the malls don't have such signs up.

The anti-racism activists always avoid evolution, statistics, or genetic differences. They censor your arguments by dismissing them as racist and therefore unusable while they only allow their own interpretation to exist.

>aving criteria that looks at a person as an individual want law to forcibly pick certain demographics to create a distribution that makes them feel good rather than allowing ability to pick who gets uni/film/awards/grants/etc
> Equality and the fight against discrimination are their rational, ignorant or incredulous to the fact that positive discrimination is still discrimination.

Lay off the acid, professor. Your language skills am degrading.

>namefag is retarded

News at 11

How did you guys turn an armored car thread into a discussion about racism and human nature?

>How did you guys turn an armored car thread into a discussion about racism and human nature

That stuff is on topic Because there is no need for an impractical armored passenger car inside the USA borders otherwise.

I live in chicago and you're full of shit.

Someone mentioned Chiraq (chicago) because of all the collateral damage from high-speed bullets (AK47). So if you drove thru those areas, some sort of bulletproof car armor can be justified.

>I live in chicago and you're full of shit.
You live in the good part of chicago. The violence happens in the not so good parts of town. Some people complained about the selective policing disguised as "budget issues" as being a way of containing the violence so that all the violent people are forced to be in one area to kill each other off.

Nigga meet me outside the liquor store I'll beat your ass and clap you

>some people complained
Then they should stop being violent people

>chicago 2015
>490 murders

>manhattan 2015
>460 murders

>los angeles 1992
>2,500 murders

muh chiraq

From the unspoken lines about your life in Chicago, I would say people like you and your politicians are part of the problem. They've hunkered down and protect mostly the good part of town. Then they save budget and reduces services to the rest with those financial gerrymandered fiscal districts. Fire district this. Police district that. And taxes different. And of course, to all those people, Chiraq doesn't exist. It's some other part of the world.

You're absolutely right it has NOTHING to do with hood culture and music. You're even perpetuating it right now. You think it's cool to live dangerously. You think it gives you some kind of cred to be from "chiraq" even though by world and even historical US standards the murder rate ain't isn't that high for a city of that size.

>Anyone ever thought of getting an armored car?

Is there even a "chain store" that provides such security services? If light armor could be commoditized for cars, that would make it affordable.

>Anyone ever thought of getting an armored car?
Why do we need one in the first place? And if we need one for safety, that means there is a problem in our personal lives we should deal with without using armored cars as the first choice solution. I recommend "white flight" as the best, cheapest, and safest solution to your needs for having an armored car.

>How can corporate and academic equality truly be achieved through federally mandated diversity quotas rather than meritocracy?

Your question requires a long term answer. But the blacks demand a short term answer because they think less of their children's welfare than of their own immediate welfare. The types of answers of short term thinking and long term thinking are incompatible and a compromise combined with the black community's willingness to squander opportunity led to the current problems.

Look at how the asians historically fared in the usa. The parents typically foregone their own short term wants and put effort into educating their children, raising them to be solid citizens, and pushing them thru school instead of teaching them to be dropouts. The parents were of low education too and didn't even know the english language when they came over, so they had less than the blacks. But the children succeeded and that was enough for the asian parents who thought of the long run.

What happened in the end? Look at how asians rose from nothing to be something in the usa. They had less than the blacks and not even the language. Now they are accepted as part of the solid community. On top of that, they even have the lowest crime rate in most categories as tracked by the police.

>I work in the murder capitol. Drive by shootings happen all the time
>That's why they call it chiraq

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiraq

There is also no need for 800+ hp rwd car from the 90s modded to hell and back within the borders of the USA, yet we have plenty of those.

As to need for armored as well as high-HP modded cars, I remember when the usa vice president visited for some campaign fund raiser. The policed blocked off all overpasses as the caravan advanced on the freeway. A rolling roadblock in front and behind blocked all cars and ramps. And side streets got blocked off too. It was well practiced. One moment, boom, various parked cars alongside the road turned out into traffic and blocked it. They sure got in my way.

About 1 minute later the VP caravan exited from the freeway and crossed in front using the wrong side of the road of course but it had max width and access for flanking. They ignore a lot of road markers and drive where they want since it is just their own safety that matters.

I was thinking, if america was post apocalypse, that is how the rich and powerful would drive in the first place. For their own convenience and safety. And of course the laws would be modded to support that.

>Anyone ever thought of getting an armored car?

It only increases the chances of my car getting jacked because someone else wants it for their drug running. So I wouldn't do it even tho I have the HP to handle the weight.

>armored car

If we wanted to avoid someone carjacking us, that means they would run up to the car and point the gun at us thru the window? So, is armor even useful for a normal car? There are too many windows to get bulletproofed.