Unfair comparison thread

Title says it all. I hopped on CLfor a 2-3kproject and a slew of them popped up

Main contenders -
>2k
Unknown year 200SX (pic related)
>2.2k
FC (I think) 1986 RX7
>2.4k
AW11 MR2 N/A, 1985
>2.5k
1993 240SX


Advert for the 200SX
dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/5923237559.html

Other urls found in this thread:

dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/5926186111.html
dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/5932887260.html
dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/5938138753.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

RX7 Ad
dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/cto/5926186111.html

MR2
dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/5932887260.html

And 240
dallas.craigslist.org/dal/cto/5938138753.html

Which one would you choose? I'm leaning for the 240

240SX

easy choice

Rx7 would out perform all. But its a 4lug so i would say no.
200sx is pigfat and slow as fug
240sx will be insanely unreliable
Mr2 is best choice unless you dont mind a 4lug rx7.
Ive owned all these cars except a 200

would it be worth getting a 240 and tuning it for handling and not doriftu

Not OP,

What's bad about 4lug?

I cant say for sure its 4lug. It has a sport spoiler which was 5lug but i dont see the rest of the sport package...
To answer your question.
4 lug rx7s were base model. The only significant difference was smaller brakes all around and non vented brakes in the rear.

s13 will be in considerably worse shape than the other cars