What went wrong?...
What went wrong?
Other urls found in this thread:
Way to much luxury, not enough performance
Honda hasnt been right since they killed the s2k
Light weight
Balance
RWD
A pure car held in high regard by Senna And the Drift King
How did the NEW one become a "meh" hated by purist drivers....it's not even about speed, or times....the feel is WRONG
The first NSX had something to offer the world: supercar performance and styling, with good reliability and reasonable price.
The new NSX doesn't offer anything new, nor does it pay homage to the original. It's just a generic modern supercar.
>What went wrong?
Senna is kill
Nothing. great car and possibly a future japanese classic. Veeky Forums will love it once it pulls off some meme lap time. When the original NSX came out the base model was barely faster than base model C4 Corvettes and slower than M3s.
But i thought feels were for boomers :l
the old NSX is a billion dollars now
You can't even shift it user
Acura chose not to draw the line between making a good car and displaying tech.
>once it pulls off some meme lap time
It already has
Nothing
Yeah flappy paddles dont exist
>too heavy
>shit cornering
>shit acceleration
>only 500hp
>too expensive
Worst flop of the year desu
You tards realise the original NSX wasn't a pure driver's car either? It was loaded with tech and luxury as well
>corners like it's on rails
>acceleration matches million dollar hyper cars
>costs 2/3rds of Ferrari's offering, same as the original NSX
Let's not forget the real reason they made the new NSX...
>womyn can into cars too!
>look a fit blonde womyn designed a super car!
>can you even!
>yes you can because womyn are equally contributing members of society that can do anything men can do and this car proves it!
>90s "tech"
>90s "luxury"
>acceleration matches million dollar hyper cars
Maybe to 10 MPH, but to 60 or the 1/4 mile, it isn't even the fastest in its own price range
nothing
its a great car
just because some BR nigger isnt alive to get a paycheck and say good things about people dont like it
>the real reason they made the new NSX
The concept was announced well before she was brought onto the project, and all she did was stick on some vents for cooling
>designed mostly by men for 90% of it's design phase (which was over a decade)
>women brought in to solve a heating problem with cooling the turbos (which she fixed)
>/r9k/ complains the entire car is her fault
Here's the thing, the NSX can do that all day and you don't have to dig through menus to bring it up, just hold the brakes, rev up, then go
Hey, there is the P3 again!
Oh right, the car from the early 90s was supposed to have tech and luxury from 2017
Which just proves that Honda was only interested in promoting a vehicle - any vehicle - designed by a WOMYN.
Seriously, no other manufacturer has EVER paraded a designer around the way Honda did with this chick. She was fucking EVERYWHERE, on EVERY show, promoting this tedious piece of shit. Ironic, because she was just 7/10 eye candy that garnered the vehicle more views. Could've had the same effect by hiring Kate Upton to smear her tits all over the car for 30 minutes straight.
lel these
I've seen her on Jay Leno's garage for like 5 minutes and that's it, you faggots make it sound like she was plastered all over billboards
And she seems to actually know about car design, a hell of a lot more than all of Veeky Forums combined
>b-but muh pop-ups
maybe if you whiteknight a bit harder she will suck your dick user
>having something higher than a double digit IQ and not sperging out over nothing is now considered white knighting
>He thinks you can shift without a clutch pedal
...
>he thinks you can't
just find the RPM sweet spot and cram it.
does your gender studies professor know you spend time on Veeky Forums?
lmao so apparently its a shit car because they dont like that a woman worked on it
>be wrong and get btfo
>sperg out and resort to ad hominem
lmao
They also can't afford it, that's always a key factor
>>New
>>Sportscar
>eXperimental
>literally playing the victimhood card this early
wow this really is a woman's car
Is that Alec Baldwin?
Where's your nsx then, faggot
I bet you ride in a manly man bus
t. beta cuck
samefag, and you can't afford it either so that's a moot point
not my fault you dont like a car because you hate women
only one of those is me desperat/o/
Not exactly, sure it was mid engine but a 6 cylinder and some bucket seats wasn't tech, not even for the 90's
I'm not butthurt enough to cry about cars I can't afford like you faggots
Just need 3-5 years to pay off my mortgage then I can get whatever
BREAD ON HOOD FAGGOT
I WANNA SEE YOUR NSX
>just a 6 cylinder
You guys are just cementing that nobody on Veeky Forums knows a thing about cars
>Just need 3-5 years to pay off my mortgage
literally lol'd
>pretending you don't live in mumma's basement
If there's a cuck without a house in this thread, it's you.
Whatever helps you sleep at night, buddy
the original NSX was an ugly kit car of a midengined Accord
its just a V6 a shit one at that
>Just need 30-50 years to pay off my mortgage
FTFY
...
fuckin ur mum certainly helps
not being a wageslave indebted to jewish overlords is a good start
yeap
lets act like this piece of shit is a godmachine because some hue faggot said so
Maybe. or maybe today's modern tech doesn't align with desirable attributes for true drivers.
Yeah but nobody on Veeky Forums actually owns or drives cars
>>corners like it's on rails
Every review said it cant out corner or accelerate a 10 year old R35
your a total fucking retard
>acceleration matches million dollar hyper cars
No it doesnt its noticeably slower
>costs 2/3rds of Ferrari's offering, same as the original NSX
250k+ and NOSALES lol is hilarous
as if
>I pulled all of this out of my ass
shes qt and the car looks nice but its too heavy, slow and overpriced to be considered any good
Every review I seen says it handles pretty damn well
>$250k
More like $160k, like said your pulling shit out of your ass
I don't get it what's wrong, it's a great looking car.
looks do not make a classic car alone.
it doesnt handle very well
it doesnt accelerate very well
and it costs alot
maybe it will age better than we think but right now its crap compared to other cars and the original
Its not a pure driving macheeeen that Veeky Forums can bench race with
/spoiler/ Veeky Forums is going to hate the new supra too no matter how good it is /endspoiler/
but it does...Litteraly every review says it does, and its not like you ever drove one yourself
You've driven it?
>and it costs alot
So like other super cars?
>wanting to drive a cuckmobile
stay mad
its not a supercar
it doesnt have the performance or the cred to back it up
Even the R35 and Vette which are 10years+ old shit over it
Except it was faster and drove better than the GTR in Motortrend's comparison
It's not a super car, it's just a sports car.
>design is a total fucking mess, overkill on the tryhard
>no one is excited about it because they've been "teasing" us with the concept for 10 years
>muh hybrid
>gets btfo by a hellcat or new Camaro zl1 that cost half as much and are almost affordable to normal people
>Oh and it weighs as much as a dump truck
Honestly what is to like about it? Where us the excitement?
I think they should've kept it simple with a non-hybrid high revving NA engine, kept the weight down, tamed the styling and dropped the price.
Or just make a stupid expensive hand-made all carbon fiber v-10 powered flagship a la Toyota LFA. Either way I would have been more interested.
everything.
all they had to do was remake the nsx.
they fucked up bad.
can't drive as well as my lowered Miata
then why is it priced like a supercar?
they fucked up
>posts bait pic
>is posting bait
6/10 pretty subtle
Because it is a supercar
literally a baby 918 Spyder
>literally a baby 918 Spyder
literally a fat slow pos thats selling like crap and will be discontinued soon like the abortion it is
>it doesnt handle very well
>it doesnt accelerate very well
>and it costs alot
every "classic" car ever
>0-60 in 2.8 seconds is slow
I bet your Civic with a few simple mods is faster, right?
>being this fuckign stupid
see it beats EVERYTHING short of the million dollar hypercars and the viper
160k isnt supercar pricing
>160k isnt supercar pricing
your right its hypercar pricing
>its an Veeky Forums is stuck in the 90s episode
0/10
Fuck off hybrid cuck
go suck off a v6 biturbo kers wank
There's nothing cuckold about instant torque
unless you trade it for can't turns
>what is a v8
get a v8
at least v8's can turn
NSX is a boat
go home user your drunk
everyone hates the NSX
reviews dont mean shit
autists on Veeky Forums hate the nsx
ftfy
It's no less of a phenomenal car, but when your flagship is getting outpaced by camaro's, there's something wrong. Sad cause Honda has SO much potential but they fell short.
>flagship is getting outpaced by camaro's
Sauce?
Even so, put a non-racing car driver in both and I bet the NSX would win every time
>It's no less of a phenomenal car,
How?
Its ugly
fat
snow
doesnt corner particularly well and its HEAVY
literally everything a supercar/sportscar isnt
its more like a aborted wank that car historians will talk about as a huge piece of shit
still better than the original by every objective manner and lives up to the name
all that matters really
>still better than the original by every objective manner and lives up to the name
Then why is it selling like shit?
Why does everyone hate it?
Fuck off your delusional
>wank
brit detected
Come back to me when you can actually drive a car, or something thats not a 1 liter shitbox
It's does a bit of everything good, it just doesn't stand out in any particular way. it's not the best at anything.
like ferrari
ausfag actually
go suck off Acura's dick
at least ferrari dont use cuckv6 or hybrid crap
Oh makes sense
10% of Veeky Forums, 90% percent of the shitposting. They should just ban your whole country
>Then why is it selling like shit?
compared to what
>Why does everyone hate it?
only autists hate it