We need a Third Way

a new ideolog, a new world view beyond Capitalism and Communism....

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=juRTKFoHdV4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercapitalism_(concept_in_Italian_Fascism)
youtube.com/watch?v=jS4pmfLWiz8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>a new ideolog, a new world view beyond Capitalism and Communism....

Islam.

In'shallah.

Nice meme, retard.

national socialism my friend

It already exists. It's called Keynesianism. Welcome aboard.

Fascism

Fascism is a political system, not an economic system.

>"Why hello there!"

unironically this

>We need a Third Way
>a new ideology
As a economic system I would say Fascism is socialism combined with Capitalism.

It's called state capitalism + social welfare.

youtube.com/watch?v=juRTKFoHdV4

>what is corporatism
Really?

shut up satan

Ever heard of the third position?

...

CAPITALISM IS AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM; COMMUNISM IS AN IDEOLOGY; THAT DICHOTOMY IS SENSELESS; AN ACCURATE DICHOTOMY WOULD BE CAPITALISM, AND SOCIALISM.

THERE IS ALREADY A SOLUTION: SOCIALISM WITHIN A NATIONALISTIC FRAMEWORK; ID EST: NATIONAL SOCIALISM IN ANY OF ITS MANIFESTATIONS.

honestly fascism is the middle ground

FASCIST ECONOMY IS JUST SUPERCAPITALISM.

WRONG, AUTIST. FASCISM UTILIZES A CAPITALISTIC ECONOMY WITHIN A CORPORATIST FRAMEWORK, BUT THE MOTIVATIONS OF FASCISM ARE COMPLETELY DISTINCT FROM THE MOTIVATIONS OF MATERIALIST CAPITALISM.

I CAN TYPE IN ALL CAPS TOO! ALSO FASCISM IS THE CLOSEST THERE IS TO A MIDDLE GROUND BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND CAPITALAISM.

Anyone care to comment on this?

The creator of this imagine obviously does not know the actual definition of "corporatism.

*image

I'm very confused as to why the Amish are considered far-leftists in this. I'm also very confused as to why Mussolini is listed as being more "socially right" than the Amish whereas George Bush is listed as being on the same level of "socially right."

>A CAPITALISTIC ECONOMY WITHIN A CORPORATIST FRAMEWORK...

ID EST: SUPERCAPITALISM.

DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT IS THAT YOU ARE POSTING?

>... BUT THE MOTIVATIONS OF FASCISM ARE COMPLETELY DISTINCT FROM THE MOTIVATIONS OF MATERIALIST CAPITALISM.

1. CAPITALISM IS INTRINSICALLY MATERIALISTIC; THERE IS NO "NONMATERIALIST CAPITALISM".

2. THE "MOTIVATIONS" OF CAPITALISM ARE THE SAME IN ANY OF ITS ITERATIONS; VIDELICET: TO MOVE CAPITAL.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercapitalism_(concept_in_Italian_Fascism)

Are you retarded?

And also: national-socialism is a revisionist and corrupted version of true fascism.

>Mussolini being that right-wing

Interesting, I hadn't heard of Mussolini's concept of supercapitalism. I assumed Ryzhknd was a leftist trotting out the "fascism is just capitalism's answer to socialism" line. However, he seems to be misunderstanding or misusing the term since the article states that Mussolinini was opposed to it.

>wahhh every person I don't like is left wing wahhh

I'm a fascist, my dude.

Democratic market socialism.

You will notice most major criticisms of the USSR are of it's non-market economy and lack of human rights.

Fascism and National Socialism

WHY DO YOU POST A LINK TO THAT "WIKIPEDIA" ARTICLE?

>national-socialism is a revisionist and corrupted version of true fascism.

FASCISM, AND NATIONAL SOCIALISM, ARE TWO MUTUALLY DISTINCT IDEOLOGIES; NEITHER IS DERIVED FROM THE OTHER.

YOU ARE IGNORANT AND MORONIC; IGNORANT FOR NOT KNOWING WHAT EITHER FASCISM, OR NATIONAL SOCIALISM, ARE, AND MORONIC, FOR INTENTIONALLY CONFLATING THEM, DESPITE IGNORING WHAT THEY ARE.

Reminder not to reply to the mentally ill mexican

>And also: national-socialism is a revisionist and corrupted version of true fascism.
You sound like one of those fascists who's afraid of being called anti-semitic or racist so they disavow Nazism.

>At this stage, supercapitalism finds its inspiration and its justification in a utopia: the utopia of unlimited consumption. Supercapitalism's ideal is the standardization of the human race from the cradle to the grave. Supercapitalism wants all babies to be born exactly the same length so that the cradles can be standardized and all children persuaded to like the same toys. It wants all men to don the very same uniform, to read the same book, to have the same tastes in films, and to desire the same so-called labor-saving devices. This is not the result of caprice. It inheres in the logic of events, for only thus can supercapitalism make its plans. - Benito Mussolini
Well he's not completely wrong
With globalism and the like, our culture nowadays consists of consuming regurgitated things the megacorporations are feeding us due to a similar culture we have worldwide
Although not entirely right as of yet
I do think that it would be the endgoal of big corporations and globalists, especially if they are both

>Hitler on the left
>Stalin to the left of Marx
>"Socialistic capitalism"
>Corporatism=capitalism when I don't like it
>Laissez-faire capitalism in the center

At least they got JFK and Clinton almost right. Another retarded Americlap who can't into politics

Funny how you didn't even try to argue against Mussolini's argument.

Italian fascism and Spanish national-syndicalism are inherently better than the baseless amalgam of ideas that some call national-socialism.

What is "supercapitalism" to you?

>Funny how you didn't even try to argue against Mussolini's argument.

YOU OUGHT TO IMPROVE YOUR "READING COMPREHENSION"; THE ARTICLE THAT YOU LINKED DOES NOTHING BUT CONFIRM THAT FASCIST ECONOMY IS JUST SUPERCAPITALISM —THERE IS NOTHING TO ARGUE.

SUPERCAPITALISM IS CAPITALISM ON A LARGER SCALE; SUPERCAPITALISM IS STATE CORPORATISM.

So showing that Mussolini rejected supercapitalism proves that fascism is supercapitalist?

And do you even know what corporatism in the fascist context even is?

DISTRIBUTISM

Sounds gommie

Reply to this post with a completely original ideology you made up on the spot.

feudalism

Why do you massively contradict yourself. Do you just like arguing from both sides?

That's a pretty interesting ideology.

Thanks user.

the smartest/strongest people will always have most of the money.
Just eliminate money and hunt/gather. Then again, cheifdoms will form and it will be the same.
Its always the same. Capitalism is just the closest we have to it being ok
But that picture is inaccurate. Americans dont starve or die under capitalism.
Waiting until your 30s to buy your first home is not the same as living in a small government apartment with shitty heaters and water that is unsafe because the people that designed and installed them had no reason to do good work.
Having to eat at burger king is not the same as having to trade sex/ everything you own for extra rations
Going to a humane prison for committing a crime is not the same as getting gulaged for suspicion of speaking against the government and dying of fever/starvation after 5 years.

you-rang?
youtube.com/watch?v=jS4pmfLWiz8

unironically this

Mixed economies.

A balance between privately owned assets and government owned assets

>national-socialism is a revisionist and corrupted version of true fascism

Let me guess, you also think Hitler created national socialism

But we already have that today.

Distributionism under a catholic nation governed by an enlightened absolute monarch.

Deus valt, gas the kicks and faith war now.

No, the NSDAP existed before Hitler and other proto-fascist parties before it.

And if you're talking about Marx's contemporary that coined the ter national-socialism, that's not fascism.

before Hitler was its leader*

I'm talking about Draxler and Strasser actually, who definitely were socialists and not fascists. Hitler was a crypto-fascist who hijacked the movement.

Yugoslavia. The best of both worlds in a mix economy.

The political and economic power of the great jews curtailed and cucked by the Democratic Assembly of the People, and the dysfunctions of a communist economy surpassed by a free enterprise.

Simply the best.

Why?

Yugoslavia was essentially Fascist.

>Social welfare
Shut it stan

POOR LITTLE BLACK GUY

Surprise surprise, we might be living in the best of possible imperfect systems. Mixed economies. Socialist Democracies. Federal Republics

Is there anything that isn't right wing/left wing, capitalist/communist/nationalist, and neither authoritarian or liberal? And zero combination or mix and variation of the above?

behold

i prefer anarchist national capcommunism desu

Kek
Are there more like this

lol found it on 8 chan /b/ years ago

>corporatism

you have no idea what that means.

Please m8, the next OP you make call it "4th way", different from "Capitalism, Communism and Fascism". If you don't, it would be again full of this pro-Fascist comments.

> governed by an enlightened absolute monarch
That's not how Distributism (not often called distributionism) works. Guilds and communities are the focus, not overarching national authorities.

idk why I get McDonalds vibes from this image.

Quit typing in all caps, you dumb fuck.

Please tell me you are joking.

brainwashed by consumerism already huh

>Its the Keynes shill again

Socialism is only meant as a temporary transition into Communism.

Embrace egoism

capitalism with added meme magic. I like it.

>political compass
>literally fucking ever


>"n o"

>muslim women
>highly educated
this is some good bait