Who was in the wrong here?

Who was in the wrong here?

The one who started the war and then couldn't stop meddling in it.

They were both incompetent shitheads, to be honest.

stalin because hitlers coat

Barbarossa was a preemptive strike.

...

Konoe

Everyone knows Hitler... only edgelords and brainwashed Westerners believe Stalin was worse

>Even having to ask this question

Germany broke the chains of usury, Germany broke the chains of banking slavery. Germans lived well.
Meanwhile, in the USSR people were under a tyranny and there was the Holodomor.

>t. Edgelord

stalin beat hitler, that's the only thing that matters
also hohlomor was a hoax

Just like WW1, when Germany pre-emptively strted a world war

both


anyone who says otherwise is an edgelord

This

They were both genocidal maniacs.

Red Army commie SJW edgelords blame Hitler.

Nazi Wehraboos fascist egdelords blame Stalin.

Both

Hitler moreso for creating WWII but I'm sure Stalin would've done it if nothing at all happened due to...

>muh invasive communism

Ordinary germans did not live very well at all during nazi germany. Workers rights got shafted, their wages cut, education plummeted (even military academies were sub-par by the end of the war) and they could not freely engage in the arts.

What part of their lives would you consider "well"?

You praise a genocidal tyrant just because he was on the winning side. Furthermore, you deny the horrors of the Holodomor. You're disgusting.

>Germany waited 2 days so their war could begin on the 1st of the month

The German autism memes are real

Look up the German Economic Miracle.

Regarding education, I don't know about the quality of education at the time.

Regarding art, are you talking about how degenerate art was tackled?

>degenerate art

>Regarding art, are you talking about how degenerate art was tackled?

Would someone post that screencap explaining how the NSDAP was actually a bunch of autistic plebs who didn't know the first fucking thing about music, and thus had absolutely no place controlling it?

>Look up the German Economic Miracle.

The economy was already recovering under the Weimar government, and Hitler actually slowed it down by deposing/assassinating key political figures behind the recovery. His administration was responsible only for dragging Germany into an economic situation that was completely unsustainable without warfare, and by the time they invaded Poland they were seeing shortages on food and commercial goods.

It was obviously Hitler. Stalin was a piece of shit and will go down for the rest of history as such, but Hitler was the one to attack, and Hitler actually would have had a chance if he didn't attack Russia. I mean fuck what a moronic move. They were both terrible humans.

>Degenerate Art

Don't mind if I do.

nice

>German Economic Miracle
>mfw

You mean the German Economic Mirage?

Both.

t. true fascist

This. The German and Russian people fought in the name of their leader and nation in a Darwinistic struggle for will to power in true fascist fashion, and the Germans (being the lesser race) obviously lost.

How was it "in true fascist fashion"?

Putting random words to form a sentence doesn't really make an argument, you know.

Far-right nationalists in the late 19th and early 20th century believed that there was going to be an inevitable and permanent struggle between nations and that cultures could only thrive when challenged by others. It was very much a misunderstanding of Nietzsche's Will to Power, but the philosophical roots of it go all the way to people like Johann Gottlieb Fichte and the German romanticism of the late 18th and early 19th century.