>This car was released in 2003
Find a car model that has aged better. You can't.
>This car was released in 2003
Find a car model that has aged better. You can't.
altima aged pretty well imo
Rx-8
Could've posted less retarded picture to begin with, OP
1970
Major reason why I own a speed 3 of this generation. Fucking stunning car
It gives me an early 80s vibe, except the back looks like a 60s concept.
imo it aged very well
Pls be trolling
that pic does it much more justice
This Aged much better than your pathetic ford did, OP.
...
...
Mazdas in general age pretty well
2003
>stancefag garbage
2002
...
2001
thank u
This.
Still looks like it came out yesterday.
Then again BMW interior design hasnt come all that far in 15 years so in a way I'm not surprised.
1997
C5
>1997-2004
>pop-up headlights for muh aesthetics
A cute!
1990
>huge drilled and slotted rotors in the back
>stock blanks up front
The fuck?
...
...
...
Pop up master race
better braking for the drive wheels? Thats my guess.
But the weight shifts forward when you brake and the drive wheels aren't powered while braking usually.
...
...
1963
those wheels are not a good match for the car
No.
Getting mangled by some stancefag is not aging well.
1994
The front rotors are drilled and slotted too, if you look closely. From the angle the picture was taken it looks like the rear rotors are bigger though it could just be an optical illusion and in reality the rotors are the same size all around. Even then though that's unusual because corvettes have smaller rotors on the rear albeit still drilled and slotted
Eh this still looks alright-ish, but they're age definitely shows
G35. Sedan and coupe.
yuck those ugly headlights
nearly as big as the jukes
Naw. They got the horrible "2000's jellybean" look going on. Sorry Mohammad.
1970
meh
try 1963
omg whoever did that shouuld be shot
>pic is what it should look like and what OP's post should have been.
FD is the best looking car to come out of Japan.
NSX too boxy, Poopra looks like a bar of soap
holy shit, and they're super cheap too
gonna cop me one rn
...
>FD is the best looking car to come out of Japan.
>people actually believe this
Sorry about your crippling mental illness
my son
I say the TSX aged pretty decently.
Released in 2004
>Adorable blushing aero egg hatch with Sr20 and A CUTE
Original NSX
Volvo C30 first gen
Ferrari 360 Modena
Citroen DS2
Mazda RX7 FD
Skyline R34
I would even argue the third gen MR2 still looks great
Is this another Aesthetics thread?
1993
and then this thing came out in 97 and it looks older?
the toyota 2000gt
i could literally post thousands of cars but we all knew this already
>aged well
Nobody else moved forward.
That thing looks tacky af.
>doesn't post an alternative
Good Job
Literally the blandest looking convertible produced by someone other than Toyota or some murican shitbox.
>pic related
I ready dont like the GT, I like the original F1 much better. Was the GT any better performance wise?
>pop up lights
>low beltline
>aged well
>no one has posted this yet
This and the other GTRs for that matter
i hate wagons and hatchbacks, the mazda models are the only acceptable looking ones imo
'65
2001
The fact that Astons haven't changed much aesthetically helps a lot
Why change perfection though?
>ford hasn't improved its shitty design in over 70 years
Who would've guessed??
replace the headlights with HIGHLY DETAILED led lights (lots of stupid shapes going on in there), put some sharp creases like on the hood on the side and you have a brand new looking car
muh racecar rules is why
also its fuck ugly
nah that looks VERY late 80's to me
timeless
this
...
>1993
I kinda prefer the incandescent look over the projection lights tbqh
not changing your design for 54 years doesn't count
>1993 - 2007/2012
It wasn't a beauty but it was definitely ahead of its time a couple years.
Looked most at home around 2000
>trying to """"improve"""" perfection
it aged well mate. it looks 'old' since anything that isnt a monstrosity of the CURRENT YEAR and bloated as fuck is pre 2010 anyway.
the 90's called they want their puke back
Is there a reason why older sports cars didn't have wide tires
>>low beltline
I can excuse people not liking pop ups, but how the fuck is a high belt line a good thing?
Do it right, do it once.
Tire tech was utter shit up until like the 90's
They simply didn't know how to build quality wide tires.
Wheels were small and sidewalls large because they hadn't figured out how to balance sidewall stiffness with comfort quite yet. Lots of decades of suspension development since then.
And with respect to the old 911, the thing weighed about 2,200 lbs and had 130-180 horsepower stock, that's Miata tier power & weight, Miata's get sold today with 205 tires on a 7" wheel, first gen 911's had 6.5" wheels so it's not like it's under tired. Except you know, accounting for the shitty compounds back then.
They didn't have massive horsepower and they were very lightweight. They didn't need huge tires to put the power down.
Also the fastest way around a corner in an old Porsche is sideways, and the thin tires help that.
...
Muh
Dick
oh look its another tripfag with shit taste
I have impeccable taste ask anyone
>tags Mustang
>not Challenger
>muh e3x m5
shit taste
hahahahahaha GTFO OP with that rebadged focus. They literally are the definition of rust.
Timeless.
e34, nobody had black plastic door handles come 2000 except Kia.
i miss those chrome steel handles
>Timeless.
Timeless implies something so ageless you can't tell how old it is.
That thing was the shitbox of my grandfather's generation.
>not liking e34/39 m5
plebeian status confirmed
Front end of these is just too damn good
i dont like over rated m5 boy racer eurotax crap
the lesser models are actually better bases with all the m goodies swapped in
...
00 4runner
>Let's make door handles out of metal so they burn the shit out of people using them when it's hot out.
No thanks.
This thread isn't about what cars you like.
Fuck even a goddamn Plymouth Prowler fits better than any BMW that isn't the 507.