>Having a motorcycle license doesn't make you a good rider and it sure as hell doesn't mean you're capable of doing any spirited riding safely.
>murrica
That's why I said "should".
Do you realize they're called accidents for a reason, right?
[ D a i l y B i k e T h r e a d ] - /dbt/
Speeding offences lead to good behaviour period, neg riding charge breached that. Selling my bike and going travelling for 6 months throughout the suspension
TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
What bike?
>Welcome to the Harley lifestyle
No, I used accident on purpose.
He thinks he can predict while he can't. If you're doing something extreme you can't avoid accidents.
1971 CT90, just rebuilt the engine a few months back. Not sure if it's because I decided to use the old head as is or if I just rode it too hard.
>Do you realize they're called accidents for a reason, right?
They are called "accidents" because the term does not assign blame to any parties and is used as a means for explaining an incident without attributing fault to oneself or others.
This is irrelevant to the current discussion however.
If done responsibly you can hoon without the possibility of "accidentally" landing your bike on a toddler by choosing your location carefully, prerunning the area, and ensuring you have adequate sight lines.
I always feel like you should be smarter than this but you never are. Like you should know that flat torque curves are about more than just the cylinder count and a flat torque curve has as much to do with bore/stroke as it does with the fueling and ignition timing.
I4s can be just as linear as V-twins and generally are more linear when it comes to performance models, a lot of v-twins are tuned to be flat which is why they are, when I4 engines are designed to be flat they are.
You're posting engines from 1000cc superbikes, but you won't find a flat torque curve on a superbike v-twin either, have a look at a dyno from a panigale.
...