Ford 3.5L EcoBoost

And I6s are better than both. What's your point?

nope, lol. i6 is the worst 6 cylinder layout

>Hp is based on torque
>torque is irrelevant
>therefore HP is irrelevant.

see

>bmw engine
>good in any way shape or form

EL O EL

reminder that the fastest street legal car on the planet uses a v6

nobody thinks radicals are cool besides miserable brit fags with nothing else in their lives

its not even a car, its a toy, it may be "road legal" but whats the fucking point

still the fastest

seems you really dont understand what horsepower is at all

>reminder that the fastest street legal car on the planet
so its legal all over the planet?

still slower than a lot of cars btw :^)
>inb4 damage control

>times set in the wet
lol
see
still faster

Had a V8, now have twin turbo v6. Turbo lag, as small as it is, sux, but the mpg is 25% better. HP and Tq is the same for both, BTW.

All told, I would rather have the V8.

Why are we having this thread again? wasn't the GT revealed to have specs that didn't exactly meet expectations and now at this point we're just waiting for it to lose to that Mclaren in a 3rd party test that's $50,000 cheaper and offers the same experience whilst also giving you a V8.

ford gt is faster than the 675lt,lol

>times set in the wet
no no it doesnt count!

but it still does count, and all those other cars were there in the same conditions :^)
stay btfo radicalcuck

>radical has never won le mans
>but v8 audis have
LMAOOO

>in a 3rd party test

it isnt

>BMW is the only manufacturer of TT I6s ever
And why is that, pray tell?

...

>damage control
>muh wet lap times
see
bwahahhahahahaa, lovin your tearz
yes, yes it is. keep crying

inferior to the v6

lol, this post triggered them

Yeah ok. But the question is WHY, nigger?

because it's an inline 6

...

...

nice selfie

Now turbo the LT4 you fucking retard

>now put forced induction on an engine that already has forced induction
??

it's already supercharged dumbass

is this a problem?

please give me the link to this build

a fucking go kart

He's not wrong. I changed my Nova engine from a high compression 350 to a 454 for the torque difference. Generally speaking, horsepower is a good indicator of the top speed of a car whereas torque is a good indicator of a car's acceleration. Which is why torque is important for quarter mile runs and hp is important for the track.

>Generally speaking, horsepower is a good indicator of the top speed of a car whereas torque is a good indicator of a car's acceleration
so wrong its ridiculous

>acceleration doesnt matter on a track, only top speed
lmao okay,

Low end torque gives faster accelerations, especially from a dead stop. It's fact.

[Ten years later]
>lt4 still running
>ecoboost is on its second set of turbos

[Wallet intensifies]
The only way to option a corvette to the price of a ford gt is to buy 3 fully loaded z07 packaged corvettes.

And you dont need a assbackwards judgement from gm to buy a corvette.

...

Power is just torque x rpm. Really isn't that hard to figure out the power. It is good too.

>$400k road car

What. Was. Going. On. In. Their. Heads?

For a fraction of the price the real car
>you know. With the airbags and the lisense plate bracket
The gt is either matched or outgunned by the gtr the z06 and the late acr. Thats a lot of acronyms that beat that acronym.

The tact that it has 2 turbos just adds 2 issues to the problem.
The damn c7r is an n/a motor so dont give me supercharger shit.
Also name any other twin turbo supercar aftermarket or otherwise that makes only 650 horse.
The damn f12 replacemant makes about 800 and costs the same.
And if i had the money today i could actually buy and f12. Not wait 2 years or be denied because my indtagram doesnt have enough followers

>damage control the post
the ford gt is faster than anything at gm
lol

I fucking hate gm. Gm is a shitty chrome design language shithole that overglorifies its perfromance brand.

That said.

They demolish fords roadcars.

The rs doesnt compete in chevy. They have no competitor.

The damn v6 1le is just about as fast if not faster than the base ford mustang gt around a track.

Fuck even the zr2 coming out is more capable and half the price of a damn raptor.
Rams powerwagon is still better than the raptor. But for some reason ford fanboys love gloating about how much their v6 twin turbo makes hp wise.

And nothing that gm makes costs over $150k so why the hell would anyone care?

The fact the z06 is even close the the gt should be embarassing to anyone that worked on the gr project

>they demolish ford's road cars
nope, keep living your delusions tho.

>the zr2 coming out is more capable than the raptor
Now you're just blatantly lying at this point. Not even gm fags on Facebook believe that. The Raptor has NO COMPETITION. It is the best production desert runner in history. PERIOD.

>rams powerwagon is better than the raptor
nope
>the z06 is close to the gt
it isn't though? what?

Thats not a zl1 in that picture.

Again 400 grand.

And yes. My purpose built desert runner.

Good thing there are deserts everywhere.

Its not like the powerwagon/zr2/wrangler can do what normal offroad fags do:trail

(2 of the 3 also option deisel)

>yet another thread where delusional gm fangirls get btfo in
loving every laugh
e
l

>that's not a zl1 ;_;!
Freindly reminder that gm couldn't create a better naturally aspirated muscle car than the gt350 so they ragequit and went to forced induction. rotflmao, gm a shit.

F

Gm does about the same or better for less cash

Sincerely,
A mopar fanboy.

>less cash
key word there. build quality is the sacrifice made.

They always kill a camro with z28.
You wont see it until it the last couple model years of the generation.

They think it might pull a repeat and be anounced with the new camaro racecar.

No word on powerplant.. Rumored c7r motor with a stripped interior

Not arguing that.

I always hated chevy design language and build quality but goddamn they know how to make rubbermaid rip down pavement

>making up stories to cope with being btfo
lol

>400k for a car noone can buy
>65k for a car beat by a 55k rubbermaid container and out horsed by a 65k landyatch
>40k for a hatchback that makes the mustang gt obsolete
>40k for a mustang that was made obsolete by a hatchback
>50k for a v6 pickuptruck that is outclassed in towing and capability by almost everything in the field.

The only car i am actually impressed with from ford is the sho taurus. Because that has a good horsepower/price/perforamnce/comfort rating.

>this delusional of reality
lol, stay btfo

Then why is the zl1 beating the gt350r around the ring by around 3 seconds?

>mfw the zl1 is slower than a v6 f150 than a body kit
stay triggered

Track car vs what im assuming is a straight line.

Why is the z51 corvette faster than the gt350?

Lt4 still running ten years later? You must do less than 100 miles a year then Lmao

>slower than the ford gt
lol, gm btfo yet again

BWAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAAHAH
*breathes*
BWAHAHHAHAHAHAA

Because gm spent a year trying to make it faster than the gt350

LOL, you are a serious shitposter. Why not posting the latest results with the BAC Mono showing that N/A 4cyl is the best layout? The engine is still built by Ford so there's nothing to be ashamed of as a fanboy.

Here, found the picture. A N/A inline 4 with 320bhp killing everything else.
Same thing on Hot Version when the S2000 beats everything on the Touge.

I'm surprised nobody has called you out for the Ecoboost only having 630 HP.

>slower than the turbo r
it has 700 hp

>claim things without proof

>spoon feed me mommy
the post

>trying to derail the topic
the post

not an argument

>still trying to avoid the topic

still not an argument

3posts and still no proof

>spoon feed me mommy!

>
>>torque is relevant

HP is a factor of torque and RPM you cuck.

see

> (You)
>see
>

See what? Without torque you wont have any power. How is torque irrelevant? It's the dumbest shit anyone can ever say when arguing about engines.

>muh
hp is all that matters

You're a new kinda retard.

not an argument. Dumbfuck

Using this graph @ peak torque the car produces 200HP @ 2500RPM and at around 5500rpm where it only makes 325lbft it produces 340HP
Where the fuck did you get this shit?

horsepower is a measure of work done. deal with it.

That's what I'm fucking saying.

peak torque is made before peak power... whats the problem here?

It makes nowhere near the quoted 600+ hp

the ecoboost makes 700 tho

>
>>BMW is the only manufacturer of TT I6s ever
>
>And why is that, pray tell?

2JZ-GTE

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower#Calculating_power