>Ford 3.5L EcoBoost
>400 lbs
>over 650 HP
>Chevy LT4
>529 lbs
>650 HP
Turbo V6's are clearly better than V8's for track performance. Why would you want extra weight if you're trying to create a lightweight track vehicle?
>Ford 3.5L EcoBoost
>400 lbs
>over 650 HP
>Chevy LT4
>529 lbs
>650 HP
Turbo V6's are clearly better than V8's for track performance. Why would you want extra weight if you're trying to create a lightweight track vehicle?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>doesn't post torque ratings
>torque is relevant
dang I didnt know them Ecoboosts were that light
world needs more Ecoboost swaps
Post dyno charts
>Turbo V6's are clearly better than V8's for track performance
no where did op mention towing your fat ass around, torque is irrelevant
although the turbo v6 boasts greater area under the curve of course
...
Enjoy pulling 15-18 second quarter miles with your ""650""" hp engine.
That's just torque, where's the power?
>base model Ecoboost v6 from 2010 blows v8s the fuck out
v6>v8