what is the most patrician muscle car?
pic related
what is the most patrician muscle car?
pic related
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
meep meep motherfucker
...
...
Git yer pocket rockets out of my way, yer little whippersnappers.
...
Hurst / Olds 442
>FWD
>not affordable
>FWD
stay classy
>affordable
did you miss that fact that patrician are effectively nobles .eg rich as fuck
Go fast with class.
came to say this
youtube.com
comfiest Veeky Forums channel on youtube
those headlights are GOAT
and the rest of the car doesn't look too bad either I suppose
I can't help but imagine woody allen at the wheel when I see one of those
looking gud bby
...
...
>muscle
It is a muscle car, fag
nope
V6 isnt muscle
its just a shitty nigmobile with a turbo
shit even V8 G bodies arent muscle
Y'all not even trying
Muscle cars by definition can't be patrician
>Be Roman patricians
>Watch man with horses run around in ovals
>Watch man beat the shit out of each other with drama
>Own massive houses with land you could get lost on
Romans would find more in common with rural rednecks than city snobs
Close.
is this easy mode?
also came to say this
Fpbp
They can, it's just a very narrow category. I think this qualifies; I wish they would come out with a new one...
i unironically want one of these cars
personal luxury =/= muscle
...
This for sure. I mean, just fucking look at it.
Holy shit
The Romans truly were Ancient Muricans
...
woah
This is my dream car.
nice sports car
>273
why
There's a thought that the capital of the Western Empire, that started in Rome, eventually moved to London and then to Washington D.C. so you're not wrong.
4.6L V-8 with 290hp...probably faster than half of what's been posted.
The 273 was the standard running gear in the Barracuda at the time. The mid '60s were the breaking point just before Detroit started stuffing big blocks into pony cars. Had the Ghia been released one or two years later, it might've gotten a bigger engine already. Or maybe not, since fuel economy and weight mattered more in European cars, hence why the Buick 215 was so popular after it was adopted by Rover, and why AC never thought to put a bigger engine in the Cobra.
Try me
273 is a 4.5
and that one only has 235 gross hp
believe me it isnt that hot of a car even for 1966
it had more to do with me wondering why they used that instead of something like a Chevy or Ford engine
but then again that was before I did some research
fekkn straya cunt
This.
This was my Dad's first car.
Of course he sold it and bought some shitty chevy before i could inherit it.
What is it?
A Chrysler
Plz halp
google literally gives the year make and model
crtl+f Superbird
Son, I am disappoint.
theres been 3 mentions
and its a pleb choice
>pleb choice
>literally banned from Nascar for being too fast
>literally btfo'd anything else from the carburetor era
It started with this one in '55
'56
'57
it was also banned along with every other aero car at the same time
its still a pleb choice
...
'59
That's like calling the Unimog a pleb choice for an overlander.
Here, take this instead you knucklehead.
'60
'61
'62
Things started going downhill at this point, as a non-letter variant 300 was introduced, the fins were gone, but the 413 still packed a punch.
what does a Datsun have to do with muscle
the pleb overlander is a Jeep
only muscle more pleb than a Superbird are:
Charger
Chevelle
Cuda
kek I like how they just get uglier and uglier every year
not really muscle either
They were still some of the fastest cars you could buy off the showroom floor.
'63
Goddamn captcha...
'63
>kek I like how they just get uglier and uglier every year
wat
>not really muscle either
Spawned the Hemi and was probably the fastest American made cars at the time.
It's more muscle than the shitbox compacts everyone tries to collect nowadays.
GAYYYYY
'64
A Superbird is the epitome of muscle, a Fairlady is the closest thing to both its antithesis and still vaguely falling in the same category.
>wat
they got progressively uglier
and neither of those things make them muscle
'65
10 years later the thrill was gone, now a slab sided behemoth the company killed off next year.
>epitome of muscle
wasnt cheap
wasnt that fast in a straight line
wasnt made for the working man
it was a race car homologation
Sorry you're so butthurt fordcuck.
Then tell me daddy
that doesnt even make sense
stop projecting your irrational car company hatred onto me
just google the image
if you give a man a fish ect ect if you teach a man to fish
THICC
I still wonder what were they smoking when they designed this thing.
Must have been some wild moonshine party between '61 and '63
Where's the hyperkinetic rabbity thing in the passenger seat?
You're addressing the wrong dude; I post a pic of a '98 Lincoln Mark VIII as an example of Patrician muscle and later list its engine and HP and you're going off about some fucking 273...
Thanks bud
They had just started unibody construction in '61, so just fucking with the unknown I guess.
still not muscle
who the fuck cares
It's a '70 Chrysler 300 Hurst, a C-body performance option, if you could call a C-body anything performance.
>tineye
Holy shit you're hopeless
I said google fucktard
Rome Paris London Washington
they each have an obelisk taken from Egypt
its the must have when you become a big wheel
The thread is not just muscle; it's a balance of muscle and luxury. Have you considered some reading comprehension tutoring? You know, it's never too late...
>The thread is not just muscle
>what is the most patrician muscle car?
gee user take ur own advice fgt
shame the 2004 model has besmirched the name
>Merriam-Webster
>muscle car definition
Fucking kek
I want that bitch to give me head just like that
The new "C" was even worse. They missed the mark...
Does this count?
thats a sports car
"...most Patrician". It's half of the thread. It means the opposite of "blue collar". It's Ok. Not everyone is "reader". I'm sure you have other skills. That flag on the side of the road isn't going to wave itself. And how else would those cones be put out?
Dat ass tho
yeah its obvious you cant read
goddamn you stupid af
>the distance from headlights to windshield is longer than from windshield to taillights
claps actually think this looks good
it was actually deemed so ugly when it came out that dealerships had to take the wing and nose cone off to sell them as normal GTXs or Chargers
You got a problem with that?
Or the other choice from FoMoCo