How do you group people from this?

>Indians

Depends on the location.

>everything else

Australoid.

Technically they diverged the most, but that doesn't mean they're more "advanced". Evolution does not have an end goal - don't take an image like that to mean that each subsequent adaptation is superior, they're just adaptations that were better at surviving in their respective environments (with some random elements).

They simply happened to emerge later because of the geographical location of the first hominids.

>most evolved

This doesn't mean anything.

with eyes.

>implying chimpanzees are as evolved as we are

fucking kek

>evolution has a universal end goal besides being fit for one's environment

read a book nigger

>because chimps are clearly as fit as humans
you libtards are killing me

>libtards
What are you even on about? Jesus christ this isn't a political issue, it's literally scientific fact, look it up. Feels don't beat facts, sorry /pol/. Intelligence is not the "goal" of evolution, it's a byproduct of adaptation that happened to occur in humans.

>talks about "scientific facts" while unable to see how hard and blatantly he is pushing the anti-intellectual agenda he has been fed

>>>/tumblr/

Most 'evolved' is a wrong way of thinking this.

Let's say most adaptive physically.

Asians and native Americans traversed and lived through more environments than others, thus they have bodies that are suitable for living in different environments more than others.

caucasians might only be a phenominom that came about since the last glacial melts. probably be over by the next ones too