>140hp
>no turbo
>no LED head or taillights
>no Apple/Android infotainment
>no sunroof
>no 4wd
>no leather
>poor visibility
How did Toyota end up making a less appealing, less feature car than the Hyundai Veloster?
140hp
Jack Hall
Other urls found in this thread:
Jackson Myers
I fail to see any of these as a con.
Landon Gray
It's essentially a better Hyundai Accent
Chase White
> 140hp more than enough for the dumb cunts on the high way
> no eco turbo that is retarded
> led bro. led bro. Good. Stop putting these on cars. It makes cheap cars look cheaper.
> No apple shilling is a plus
> No sunroof is an actually down vote for me
> 4wd is a meme
> leather is over rated
> visibility? waiting to see proof of that
Caleb Baker
>140hp
It's a light car.
>no turbo
I'm partial to NA but whatever
>no LED
so?
>No infotainment
again, so?
>no sunroof
I see no problem with it
>no 4wd
unless you're living in rust belt, again, I see no problem
>no leather
in a subcompact crossover! big whoop.
>poor visibiliity
that's basically all modern vehicle. thanks, crash safety rating!
Andrew Campbell
Because this is a soon-to-be-mom mobile. Dumb white bitches with daddy's money will flock to this because it's manly and strong looking but so small and cute!
John Fisher
because it is meant to be an economy car not a hot hatch you fucking dumbass
why do you retards think every car is built with the purpose of going fast?
Jose Perry
What the fuck is that? Not even kidding I've never seen that before. Are those Rav4 with body kits?
Brayden Roberts
Did they jack the Civic tail lights? Sad
Wyatt Davis
it's CH-R, what was almost a Scion. Subcompact crossover. Smaller than RAV4.