We can all agree this is how engines should be right?
>1.5L Inline3 - 100hp
>2l Inline 4 - 200hp
>3L 6 Cylinder - 300hp
>4L V8 - 400hp
>6L V12 - 600hp
We can all agree this is how engines should be right?
>1.5L Inline3 - 100hp
>2l Inline 4 - 200hp
>3L 6 Cylinder - 300hp
>4L V8 - 400hp
>6L V12 - 600hp
Autism
So torqueless?
No thanks.
Ill take a v8 with 400 hp but unless its FI 4L aint enough discplacement.
Summer is here!
Every engine should be turbocharged and make twice as much power.
But what If I want torque or fuel economy. If we are talking NA, those are some pretty highly strung engines
This is the fucking future, I'd expect no less than 500 from a big ol' V8 and 800 HP from a V12 unless they're extremely tiny.
>1.5L
>not 150hp
REEEEEEEEE
In all seriousness,
7.0L V8 is where it's at.
427 cube small blocks are the bee's knees.
>busfags think horsepower with no other variable is relevant
what good is horsepower if the friction from weight can slow your rotor?
And you didn't even post the cylinder geometry of the 6... just a bad thread made by an ignorant man.
weak af
even gookshit is getting 300hp from 2.0L now