PSA

thats a videogame mate.

y'all niggas need to step aside

Were are the tires?

>Pigfat

Not even. The elan looks like one of those cheap toy cars...

You know the kind, they were less expensive than hotwheels and matchbox, and the schools bought them for the 5 year olds because they were cheap and plastic?

Thats what it looks like.

a V8 Miata would give any Cobra a run for its money.

rather have a delicate lady than a butch dyke who doesnt know what refinement is

all those old Shelby cars are just retarded engines put into a British chassis

The Miata doesn't even come with a stock v8, The Cobra stock had a 427 7.0L V8

>Wanting refinement
>in a roadster

Get a Mercedes if you want refinement.

kek

ikr

I dont think theres ever been a Lotus that wasnt a cheaped out pos

at least it looks nicer

Hey look it's >16994757, the user who got salty in the challenger thread!

you may have doe a better job hiding your samefaggotry if this thread wasn't right below the other one.

Nicer than what? I honestly cant think of anything...

A twingo maybe?

GET THE FRICK OFF MY FUCKING THREAD YOU ROCKET FAGS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>A twingo maybe?
DELET THIS

I like it.

butch dyke Cobra for one

Mk1 Cobra is fine

It looks like its straight out of some shitty 3d-animated kids cartoon.

>Butch dyke cobra
You mean best cobra? The Cobra 427?

Your shit taste is not welcome here Europoor

I know its rare but Im an American who doesnt think fat is attractive

Except its not fat. Its pure muscle ;)

Lotus Elan: 1,500lbs 162hp

Cobra 427: 2,355lbs 425hp

not all of them, there were 260 and 289 cobras at first

How does that change anything? I took the best from the Lotus elan and the best from the Cobra.

DFV swap

colombo 125

shelby cobra is slow and shit
elise masterrace.

That i'd like to see, but it'd be a waste to put such a great engine in such a shitty body.

>Slow as shit

thats hilarious, the Super Snek edition of the Cobra does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds. Even the lower-powered Cobra 427 would beat the shit out of an elise

youtube.com/watch?v=VqA34UnsgaQ

Do your parents know you spend your days on Veeky Forums kid?

>creaming yourself over a cobra

oh look, another normie with normie taste in cars
you can't even afford it faggot

Looks like that anime chipped tooth girl triangle thing they do (sorry for not using the right term, i just see it on Veeky Forums)

ITT bus riding neckbeards engaging in a dick measuring contest to see who has the biggest prosthetic penis.

yea bro they cant step to veilside

>thats hilarious, the Super Snek edition of the Cobra does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds. Even the lower-powered Cobra 427 would beat the shit out of an elise
ok benchracer keep believing snek is fast because you have only one puzzle piece of what makes car.

I dont think so, not that it matters, i'm not breaking the age restriction rule.

Thats just one example of how great the Shebly Cobra is, ESPECIALLY compared to a fucking elise, lmfao

>Better 0-60 than Lotus Elise
>Higher top speed than Lotus Elise
>More horsepower than Lotus Elise
>Sounds far better than Lotus Elise
>Objectively better looking than Lotus Elise
>The Lotus Elise never even finished Le Mans

Just listen to this thing:
youtube.com/watch?v=3Bz5m4OK7yA

Its just undeniably a fantastic car.

it doesn't handle like an elise nor is it as reliable or as cheap as one.

>reliable
The cobras finished le mans, the elise gt1 broke down after 121 laps

>cheap
Yeah, because the Cobra is actually quality instead of plastic lotus shit.

>handling
I can't really find a good laptime comparison. So you're very possibly correct.

Even if the lotus is better at handling though, the cobra is still the better car.

>almost 20 grand to have some nip hacksaw your NSX

>better
>they put the engine in the wrong place

what is the point of building a race car if youre going to put the engine in front of the driver to drive the rear wheels? it makes no sense.

>put engine behind driver
>snap oversteer and die
pick 2

Lol the kit cars are not expensive. And if you're referring to the real one you're retarded, nobody can afford one of those

You wouldn't want to drift this ?

1965 Mustang Fastback 289 - $2695
1964 Elan - $4295
1963 Cobra - $5995

if the kit is so cheap why don't you own one?
bet you love buggati veyron normie
>muh power
>muh v16
>muh max speed

>projecting

It costs more because its a better car.

to make it even better the early Cobras were known for having poor handling since the chassis was never updated to handle the power and would get destroyed by weaker cars

Reminder the daytona coupe is better than the cobra

>sup aniki I wanna cop the fuccboi look for my f430
>say no more

The Daytona Coupe and Cobra 427 are essentially sister cars.

The daytona is still better

Ok, and the daytona and ac cobra are essentially slightly different versions of the same car.

Not sure what your point is.

That the daytona is better

hes not wrong though

the Daytona is objectively better

Cobra 427 is cooler. ;)

>he got mad enough to make a reply, AND inb4 about getting told he's mad

The daytona may be a better track car, however the Cobra 427 is a better roadster.

dunno

the Cobra was a flop that failed to do much other than set an acceleration record

Daytona was made to beat Ferrari when the Cobra couldnt and succeeded at doing that and more

plus only 6 were made

to me the Daytona is cooler

well I guess so since the Daytona isnt a roadster

yeah and I quickly helped derail the thread too lol

>inb4 lmao ur so mad you ruined his thread

How do you turn that on?

>filename

I don't, GTFO

Wrong

>The Cobra stock had a 427 7.0L V8

That means jack shit since American boomer engineering would make that thing produce 175HP at the crank and get 6 miles to the gallon.

Same goes for you, nigger.

>dodge challenger but not a dodge challenger

That has to be photoshopped, it looks off.