Name one thing you hate about each

better chassis better engine better exterior better interior it's all just cheap

>AMG
To much tire burning not enough fast

>V
Hamstrung by GM

>M
obesity

>posts butthurt greentext
>someone else is fragile

amg, automatics and styling
caddy, gm quality and association
m, their incessant catering to normies

Try harder, burgerbro.

Show me where the V touched you.

>nice cars but the lower cost ones are so heavy
>literally who
>not as good as they used to be a few years ago

>amerilards pretending some unknown V shit is relevant in any way

LMAO

Saw a used /V/agon for 75k yesterday, sedans go for 30k with decent mileage...fml

Also
>4200 lbs

German mustangs
Smokes all the cars but has the worst interior
Best drivers car but is getting bigger and bloated with less involvement

Take your pick

>AMG-line
>M-paket
V-sport is ok because it's not a cosmetic trim level (yet)

>If I pretend I don't know what a Cadillac V is I won't have to acknowledge they're superior

I will never get to drive any of them.

The worst feel of all auto enthusiasts: We will never get to drive the cars we drool over

can't say anything about #2 because no one would ever buy one in europe.

so superior only muh dometic amerifats buy them and even in the US they're outsold by BMW and Mercedes.

>M
>too pigfat now
Do you realize BMWs haven't gained any weight since ~1996

>superior
>performs nearly exactly as 6 year old M5
>worst interior in class + certified GM quality

>Literally faster than an M5
>This somehow makes them irrelevant

None of them mean anything anymore. Speed is cheaper than ever now. The new accord can outrun most 80s sports cars (mr2, rx-7 fc, etc.)

>ignore everything said but muh 0.1 seconds
Well I guessed we solved the mystery why nobody buys that garbage.

>too heavy
>too heavy
>too heavy

After working in automotive R&D for a while, modern performance cars don't really excite me in the same way as shitboxes do.

Sure, you feel G-forces all the same, but everything is dampened to the point that it's comfortable and everything is oddly firm.

It might be fun if the point of driving is comparing numbers or if you have arthritis, but they feel more like you're being driven around by the car than you driving the car around.

if youre really just about the speed, spend 5k on an old gsxr and you smoke all three combined

There all owned by bitchboys, rentboys, and daddy's little man child.

>faster in every way compared to a current m5

lol you played yourself

Im not sure they all exist when Porsches do

>AMG
You can't mod it yourself or you'll brick it.
>V
GM quality that shows.
>M
Normie fuel that isn't much about performance anymore.

Let's see your M or AMG

M2/M3/M4 weigh roughly 3300-3500lbs
not exactly heavy for modern car standards

>6.2k redline

how?

expensive
mundane
gay

Truck engine

It's threads like this that remind me that this board is nothing but benchracing teenagers and perma-jelly poorfaggots. Thanks, OP.

Lol

I seriously hope you're not implying M cars are in a tier below AMG cars...

Does Maybach count?

Wut

Nice. Shame it's autotragic

>it's another thread where murifats pretend their cars are good or competitive in anything but straight line
stop embarrassing yourselves, my generously portioned friends.

>luxury parking in the background
Are you that Monegasque valet cosplaying as a richfag?

not autotragic, dct

In the driver seat of a maybach was the first indicator he doesn't own it.

>luxury parking
Lmao that is a w211 in front and a 1998 G class on the right

>not autotragic, dct
>A dual-clutch transmission, (DCT) (sometimes referred to as a twin-clutch transmission or double-clutch transmission), is a type of automatic transmission or automated automotive transmission.
>automatic transmission or automated automatic transmission
>automatic automated
>automatic

I have some bad news for you retard.

>clock on the dash
When will Mercedes throw away this grandpa-style "luxury".

Everyone does this now, even Chrysler. Though I have to say, some clocks do look pretty good.

autotragic is an automatic with a torque converter
DCT is an automated manual transmission
Learn the difference wikipedia nerd

>implying that's not luxury for Latviania

>thinks just because his car doesn't say "PRNDL" it's not an autotragic

Sorry you're retarded buddy.

only ones you see are old ones driven by brown people in my area

can't get them in my country

only driven by nobheads

manual, automatic, dct, cvt are different types of transmissions
shoul've looked that up before trying to look smart

>Everyone does this now
>literally nobody but amerifats trying to ape Merc
It's a thing of the past. The only place it belongs is as a chronometer in sports cars.

>still trying to say it's not autotragic
>definition of the transmission literally has auto or automated all over the place

Wew lad. All that money couldn't buy you a brain or third pedal. :)

What part of "everyone" do you not understand?

>pretends to be a grown-up
>takes a photo of dad's cadillac
>outs himself as an autistic 14 year old
Stop wasting your youth away on shitposting, my lad.

The Cadillac isn't mine.

Just funny someone with a transmission that "AUTOMATICALLY" shifts for them is so desperate to differentiate it as a DCT.

>another brand does it
>that means everyone
Choke on a dick and die, useless time wasting piece of human garbage.

You should just learn the differences between transmissions

It's Mercedes, and it's also crazy overpriced compared to the faster competition that itself is already overpriced.

GM, ugly.

Expensive, unreliable, and heavy. In truth, this applies to the other two as well.

Do you have Chronomentrophobia? Calm down.

no seriously, he is right many companies do this.

We ain't all little faggots that grew up with a tablet and a macbook some of us actually are able to read and appreciate analog clocks.

Yeah shitbox. autotragics have a torque converter do it and your autotragic has a computer automatically shift for you.

I got it now thanks dude!

>amg
too expensive

>v series
shitty lackluster luxury

>msport
engine noises through the cabin speakers

>engine noises through the cabin speakers

This the the most absurd thing I ever seen a car maker do.

Yet people still buy bmw understeer trash

Ford does this also but with a Hose from the turbo intakes going into the cabin or something like that iirc. I remember seeing a Youtube video with an electric car or some car where you could change the exhaust sound in the smart dash menus.

nice b8

Didn't take long for the yuropoor cuck to show up.

the Renault Megane sport RS lets you select the exhaust note of the nissan gtr as a sound

>t. Triggered amerinigger who can't accept facts

>Automatic only
>American Quality
>Lost its way a long time ago.

Correct.
>E46 M3 MSRP $46k
>E39 540i MSRP $54k
the first one is worth $15-20k
the second is worth $5-8k
the second is worth

Lul it's not the Megane Sport RS(at least I couldn't find one on Youtube) but here's the Clio haha

youtube.com/watch?v=XpZ42A-R_34

So stupid.

Slower than the GT-R.

>muh muh amerinigger xD

don't you have trucks to avoid gunther?

/////AMG: It's basically just another trim level
V//: not enough variety
///M: anything above the M2 is cuckbait

>bmw
>understeer
What the fuck am i reading.jpg

>the clientele consists of boring old men
>the clientele consists of boring american old men
>the clientele consists of douchebags

>//AMG: Auto matic Gearbox
>V//: not there yet
>///M: Nothing wrong with it I love mine
=^]

>buying a BMW when every Porsche outclasses it in everyway for similar price points

Enjoy the understeer

>everyway
the boxster sure beats my M3 in backseat room

>can't buy unimog
>maximum mediocre
>what is driving

nice, pretty sad you didnt even do basic research before making such a bad decision

>AMG
Don't really like how they sound, and I think the styling is for the most part gaudy. Would rather have a normal merc
>V
killed the CTS-V Wagon, cheap interior
>M
the M3/M4 split is fucking stupid since everyone clearly knows the difference between a M3 sedan and coupe

What's good v1 bro I'm still loving mine at 160k

Now that's not a very nice thing to say, is it? I'm just pointing out the absurdity of claiming that one car is superior in every respect to another in every possible scenario. For the same price as my 15k M3, a cheapo 996 911 would probably be faster, but that isn't everything all the time.

bmw drivers and bmw understeer engineers dont

faster, more torque, looks better, insurance probably cheaper, more reliable, better transmission, better engine, lighter

...and, a 996 911 not being a sedan, is incapable of carrying 4 people. Once again, performance traits aren't everything all the time.

Enjoying mine plenty. Just passed 70k last week.

But it has 4 seats

>bland all autobahn cruisers
>not sold in my country
>depressing when you think of what they might of become instead

Without reading anything else in the thread...
>no available manual
>CTS doesn't have a removable roof panel
>has become too showy... better off in sleeper mode

...