Wow... when u think abt it, Christianity isn't that bad

>nigiger
Let me guess

A nigiger is a mix of nigger and ginger

A mix of a nigger and a xenomorph.

He's right. Check the population of the USSR 1991 and Russia 1991, you'll see a huge drop in population due to the last commie purge.

Can't wait for when we're 2000 years into the future and have a population of 60 billion, and communism won't seem so bad since Finlandkoreanism was responsible for 1 billion deaths.

Statistically insignificant probably.
No sources shits me though.

>not putting it into perspective
Remember, this was back during a time when most people didn't know much of the world outside their 100-mile radius, and having a death toll of over a million people was enough to make them change your name to Bloodsanguine the Skullfucker

Killing christcucks and capitalcucks is a good thing

le edge xd

About as justified as the Muslim conquests.

Which is to say who fucking cares what was "justified".

The first one was. Half of them were completely derailed and only made Christianity weaker.

What about the religious wars of the 16-17th century?

>failed economic reforms
>same as straight up murder

:v

>using numbers instead of percent of world/regional population killed

>using numbers instead of a pie chart

Why does this omit every other war of religion in Europe?

Because it's using history to push an agenda

/thread

>le 300 billion killer man

kek

That was Christians killing other Christians, which isn't as bad because Christians aren't human.

>stalin killed 50 to 60 million people
>it had no impact on the soviet onion.

million
>>genocide
>Remember when the memocrats sacrificed 2 billion neo-finns to kukk?

They don't count because reasons. :^)

>the soviet onion.
gonna start calling it this now thanks user

>ded finns
I see no problem.
ok

>hail gomunism :-D save teh onion

So, how did the soviet union not shrivel up and die when stalin killed 50 to 60 million USSRlings?

Now show us the world population at those times

>no holocaust listed

Pls don't tell.

>hitler
>christian

The Inquisition number is correct, the Inquisition were not a clandestine organization, they were legal, we have most of their archives.

The Crusades number seems suspect to me because I dont know how he got it, or how it would be possible to calculate it.

I do agree of atheists being much more criminal and murderous than christians, from the first moment they became demographically relevant, which would be XVIII century France.

They don't count because most of those wars were fought for economic reasons and religion was just a excuse.
Also no one ever speaks about "oh no 30 years war was so horrible, evil christianity" because they probably have never heard of it.

you fucking retard better start tallying up all german french italian and english speaking deaths and kills through all wars.

>Holocaust was Christian motivated

All that inbreeding's making Schlomo drool

>it was just an excuse.

>unlike atheists, they kill on principle.

subtle but lovely user.

And what about all the heretics and non-Christians murdered purely for religious reasons? Not just in wars or genocides, too, but due to domestic policies enacted by Christians, who's numbers we have an even more scarce record of (especially the further back we go)? The numbers really start to inflate when we get out of Europe, too.

good meme faggot

Nice omitting of the Taiping rebellion, faggot

you know china had some 500 million + people at that point?

>be Christian
>ignore the dozens of million deaths during the taiping rebellion
>whe called out, chose the lowest estimate possible and use the "no true Christian" argument

>guy that claims he's Jesus' brother
>brah he's a total christian

This is what atheists believe

How predictable

Why is it written and worded so poorly?

Why does this biased sperg think raw numbers mean anything historically without appropriate context?

Why are there no citations for any of the data that is given?

Why is OP a fag who uses 'txt' speak and grammar incorrectly?

Look at this reactionnary, Kulaks fucking deserved it.

But it's stupid.

It's like claiming Korea's a democracy

lmao

This is literally the worst meme. None of them said "yes this is communism"

Stalin and Mao were paranoid autocrats who believed repression was necessary to create communism.

Hong Xiuquan and the God Worshipping Society are universally considered Christian by historians. Saying otherwise is pure historical denialism, period.

And no, having bizarre beliefs doesn't preclude one from being a Christian.

There's a difference between bizzare beliefs and going against canon.

Also what historians?

Which canon? You sound like those protestants who argue Catholics aren't Christian.

And virtually every source on the taiping rebellion acknowledges its Christian character.

It isn't a "go to" for Christian atrocities because normies hardly know about it and the victims were other Christians.

>They don't count because most of those wars were fought for economic reasons and religion was just a excuse.

If you're going to say that you may as well say it for every religious war waged by every religion ever. Fuck off with this exceptionalism nonsense, if someone says they exterminated a group because they're infidels I'll take them at their word rather than trying to go "NO NO ITS OK! You only did it for political and economic reasons baby shhh shhhhh"

>killing innocents is unique to, and the defining feature of, Communism

Good thread, OP

>fight wars for God is wrong

When will this meme end?

> one crusades out of tens done something useful
> It was just as planned, guys! XD

The canon which all churches agree on. If he goes against the canon, he simply isn't Christian

Because it was fought so that everyone could have an excuse to kick German asses.
youtube.com/watch?v=c-WO73Dh7rY

Don't worry, they had it coming

Where's is this canon so we can know which denominations are True Christian™ and which aren't?

When did the crusades accomplish anything useful? Only the first had, at best, good intentions. But it still only resulted in the formation of a failed state.

Well they did reopen the eastern trade ways, and generally reminded Europe that there was more to the world than just internal strife.

It isn't crusaders fault that Jerusalem Kingdom was destroyed by Muslim treachery.

this thread is fun

Why did he omit the death toll of the Albigensian Crusade? The Bosnian Crusade? The Northern Crusades? The Hussite Wars? The Thirty Years War? The French Wars of Religion?

>wars of extermination conducted against various "heretic" groups (Cathars, Waldensians, Bogomils, Paulicians, Hussites) or oppression against "Progressives" (as in pre-revolutionary Spain)
>"lol, taket that, heathens xDDD"
---
>wars of extermination against Christians and the oppression of their religious activities
>"OY VEY, THIS IS TERRIBLE!"

Why are Christcucks such hypocrites? They deserve it tbqhf

>Cathars, Waldensians, Bogomils, Paulicians, Hussites
those heretics were completely bananas and deserved it
Hussites were the least bad of the lot but still filthy heretics

...