You can sue me if you feel you have legal right to demand compensation. Thats how it works, and thats how it used to work when insurance wasnt mandatory for drivers. You dealt with ot, took someone to court, or you both come to am agreement
The right to travel
Im sorry. *travelling :^)
No, this is not the board for political discussions. That would be /pol/.
>you can take your case to the supreme court
I literally just posted an excerpt from a supreme court ruling that's linked in the snopes article you fucking moron lmao
scholar.google.com
but yeah please go try driving without a license or plates, let us know how that goes
i bet this dumbass is one of those people who films cops for no reason and constantly asks
>AM I BEING DETAINED? AM I FREE TO GO?
NOTHING in that said it was illegal to travel without a license in an unregistered automobile just that cities and states may impose certain rules but they are subject to question if the citizen feels violated hence why we are able to take our cases to a supreme Court in the first place
-- A city ordinance authorized the chief of police to revoke the permit of any driver who, in his opinion, becomes unfit to drive,
In other words you need be processed and deemed unfit first before they can ever do this to you. You smoking a bowl of stupid, son?
>NOTHING in that said it was illegal to travel without a license in an unregistered automobile just that cities and states may impose certain rules
rules like you need a license and registration? lol jesus christ you're a retard
>but they are subject to question if the citizen feels violated hence why we are able to take our cases to a supreme Court in the first place
yeah and you'll lose, just like the guy in the ruling you were just reading
>In other words you need be processed and deemed unfit first before they can ever do this to you
And you first need a permit before it can be revoked, dumbass
Gotta love it when dipshits on Veeky Forums think they've discovered some loophole in the constitution lol. Reminds me of that guy who tried to barge into a courtroom with his camera out and got tazed haha
>SUPREME COURT TRUMPS ANY LAWS BY CITIES OR STATES
It doesn't really though because the whole US government is based on letting states do what they want under federal guidelines, which is why some states have overbearing strict vehicle inspections and some have none at all.
Idiots.
I really would like to see what happens when one of you 16 year old lawyers tries to drive without a license. The cop is going to laugh in your face when you tell him the constitution says you don't need a license or registration, they're going to impound your car, and you can't afford a lawyer (who would likely laugh in your face just as the cop did)
These kids must not have thought this through, otherwise they'd realize how stupid they sound
You need a licence and registration to DRIVE. Not to TRAVEL. Pls learn the difference between these words. Travelers doesnt strictly mean a passenger like some are mistaken to think. It means anyone on their way to a destination on his own private time though his own means be it horse bike bus or automobile.