I tried this on /pol/, but they are too stupid to actually answer

I tried this on /pol/, but they are too stupid to actually answer..

When was the last time Trickle Down Economics ACTUALLY worked.

I don't know, but definitely not Spain

When was the last time any of this worked

>Family guy

gtfo of here with that normy crap

When is the last time (strawman) ACTUALLY worked?

Define: "Worked"

What do you want your economic policies to achieve?

Probably rome when it conquered a shitload of treasure and gave it to its citizens, even then it was only a limited amount of people within the overall millions living within its borders.

Define "time".

Define "Define".

When it was exercised.

Never

Bordertown and Cleveland Show are better than Family Guy anyway.

>family goy

Define 'define "define"'.

It doesn't work

>/pol/ in full damage control mode ITT

bordertown makes me want to take cyanide

>conquered a shitload of treasure and gave it to its citizens
That's now what supply side is, that's blatant socialism

>anime loser judging other people

Holy shit senpai, get your life together

who you calling loser loser?

Literally, they work all the time, even under democrats.

But effectivally, nothing is working because were slowly losing all out business to china.

Define "loser".

>trickle down economics
Any capitalist country ever

>reagans extra libertarian policies
Lets talk about taxation. Having our 35% corporate tax is a lazy way of dealibg with international fompetition. It gaurantees corporations buy local assets.

Its an objective fact that private corporations are more efficient than public ones however, so high corporate taxation hurts potential gdp growth amongst other things.

"Trickle Down" is always working, whether or not an decrease in taxes will increase this "trickle down" is debatable. There isn't a single solution for every problem. At the moment trickle down probably wouldn't do anything because the economic situation in Europe is questionable and rich people won't be willing to invest. It would also increase the government deficit, (decreasing taxes almost never increases government income, despite it working a few times).

someone who can't beat a touhou game on lunatic

Growth of real wages due to technological advances isn't really trickle down unless you are able to somehow attribute all technological advance to the upper echelons. Trickle down does not simply mean economic growth. It means if you set policy to benefit the upper echelons, the benefit also transfers to the lower echelons.

fug

You got btfo because everyone pointed out that this isn't capitalism and most people on pol are national socialists.

I bet you're the faggot who keeps making those "vote against economic interests" threads.

You'd be right except for the fact that the flock to Trump