Is anyone here getting the new Civic Type R?

>honda trying to sell a 40k vehicle to underaged kids
y tho

I am thinking about checking it out.
Haven't owned honda in Long time and I miss it. I am hoping type r is what everybody says it is.
Only problem is dealer mark ups and not able to test drive them.
I am ready to move on to new amg or m cars, 40k price mark does seem high for civic...

Veeky Forums is poorfag center. Shitboxes reign supreme here. By simply having a ecoboost mustang, you're better off than most of Veeky Forums.

>he doesn't know an STI exists

It's inferior in every way. Yeah I know it exists I just don't know why anyone would ever choose one over the Type R. It's like saying who needs that 70 inch flatscreen when you could have a 22 inch CRT.

>inferior in every way
>literally 100% more driven wheels

Chose one

no

Only 50% more my dude.

the STi is slower you cuck

How

2 powered wheels on the civic
2 more on the STI.

2 + 100% of 2 = 4 wheel drive.

50% of two would be 1+2 or 3 wheels

Yes, but only when it depreciates to under half of it's MSRP. Until then I can wait.
Provided they give us a manual transmission and it cost under 40k.
>that new math

But it's not.

post an STi faster than this
youtube.com/watch?v=1OMOBmAkTdI

2 wheels is 50% of 4 wheels, are you fucking retarded or what

thats not what he said you fucking idiot

2 is 50% of 4. Adding 2 wheels to 2 wheels is an additional 50%

>2+2=4 ya dingus!

What

Adding 2 to 2 is adding 100% to 2.

2 is 100% of 2.

Therefore a car with 4 wheel drive has 100% more driven wheels than a car with 2 wheel drive.

If a car has 50% more powered wheels than a two wheel drive car, it would have 3 powered wheels. Because 50% of 2 is 1. 1+2 = 3.

>literally taking time to explain mathematics to a Veeky Forums poster
Kek

>what is 50% of 4?

Why are you being this way

What is your end game

It's adding 50% to 2 because 2 is 50% of 4. You can even plug it into your calculator, add 50% to 2 and the answer is 4

you fucking idiot

This niggers

4(0.5)=2

>Mathematical god confirmed

How sad would you be if the new Supra was slower than the Civic Type-R on the burgerking?

I wouldn't care at all if it then lost in a same driver test.

Does the new supra use the 2JZ? Please tell me they're using the 2JZ.

I would kms then I would kill you next

The engine is from BMW lol

Are you asking if they use a discontinued engine or are you asking if they are going to bring back a packaging problem? the answer to both is "no". if any straight six is going in there it'll likely be BMW's and you sure as fuck don't want that. id rather a Toyota V6 built up with the characteristics of their 2JZ (i.e being able to handle meme levels of horsepower with boost)

Only the 4 bangers

Are you a fucking retard or is this bait

okay so 1.0 is 100%, 0.5 is 50%

2 wheels plus 2 wheels is four wheels

2 + 2 = 4

2 + 2(1.0) = 4, 100% more wheels added

if we added only 50% more wheels

2 + 2(0.5) = 3

Why does a simple reference to math cause this much autism?

>2 + 2(1.0) = 4, 100% more wheels added
Your own calculation says you added 200% you idiot.

>okay so 1.0 is 100%, 0.5 is 50%
Then you multiplied 1.0 by 2. 200%.

Just wishful thinking

Well fuck

>2 + 2(1.0) = 4, 100% more wheels added
Literally what the fuck is this?

The car already has 4 wheels to begin with. With AWD vs RWD you are simply adding power to the other 2 wheels which is the other 50% of the 4/2. The other guys are right, the original guy in phrased that statement incorrectly. It's 50% more of the 4 wheels being "driven"

>what u want pham?
i took geometry in high school
>say no mo

ITT: a nigger that can't into math
Seriously, what the actual fuck.
>inb4 hurr I was just p-pretending, you j-just got b-baited

It's a good looking car

I'm sure it's a fine car, but the styling of it kills any interest I have for it.

>Veeky Forums tries their hand at basic mathematics

>spending $40k on anything with FWD

>honda trying to sell a 40k vehicle to parents of underaged kids

yes

looking into it
dealerships around me are saying it's gonna be first come first served. also heard price is gonna be just under 40k. if the stars align, i'll pick it up

that shit is fucking ugly

you won't get it this year. I already checked all the near by honda dealerships.
expect them to treat this car like limited edition enzo. Unless you don't mind paying 60k for civic.

yeah if the price ends up being crazy like that i'll just buy a new bike instead. i gave a couple dealerships my number so i'll see what ends up happening but i'm not expecting anything

No, you missed be 18 to post

there is actually few people on forum, who had msrp deal in the writing and dealerships turned around and say they want the markup.
If you can wait, just look at the focus RS, most dealerships are taking off markups, and some of them are discounting them.
First year type r is going to be crazy

>wanting a V6 to act like an i6

Is it 100 or 50 % more wheels?

Im gonna wait a year until base R comes out , should also put it around $33k before mark up, current touring package should be 36k pre mark up
those prices are currency conversion from uk BUT could be wrong

Holy fuck you are retarded. The civic has 2 drive wheels. 100% of driven wheels on the civic is 2. By adding 100% more drive wheels, which is 2, you will have 4 drive wheels.

For 40k (the same amount of money you'd spend on the Civic Type R) you could take a 3k Civic and put all of the mods on the "simple mods list" and have money to spare.

But that's not a benefit here you mong.

These aren't 500bhp cars, but 300bhp ones and you sure as hell don't need AWD for that.

If anything the STI is heavier and has greater power loss than the Civic.

And of course, it's slower.

And mind you, that's against a FWD!

All wheel drive has it's place but don't think of it as more than what it is.

so an inline 6
good

Yeah but you'd still be driving a 3k civic

SCREEN CAP THISSHIT

You arent even comparing cars in the same class...

I remember when I was 15 too

Razer everything is shit. Get a fucking Ducky or Filco or something.

I'm not a bus cuck.

The BMW version is using one of their straight sixes, if not the S55 it'll be the an M tuned version of the B58.

The Toyota version (the new Supra) will be using a V6, likely from their GR engine family. If they were smart they'd offer a V8 trim, but that might compete with RC-F sales.

im screenshotting these retarded math attempts

Can someone post a full screenshot with all the math fuck ups

working on it

retardedness now captured forever

>honda fanbois do math

are you the sti fag who started it all?

Isn't it 200% more driven wheels?

>2wd is 100%
>4wd is 200% of 2wd

No, I'm just a concerned user

Kek

ITT Veeky Forums can't in-between drive wheels and wheels.

nono dont start again retards!

fwd is 50% of the wheels
awd is 50% more = 100%

WHAT ACTUALLY IS THE ANSWER
everyone is making good arguments for their maths

>you have $2
>I say let me borrow 100% of what you have
>you give me $2
>we now have $4 total

lol please be a troll and not a complete moron.

It's OK if you don't know either user.

100% of driven wheels x2 = 200% driven wheels or 100% more driven wheels

50% of the wheels are driven + another 50% is 100% of wheels driven

both are correct

this is litterally primary school shit

>doesn't know what 100% of 2 is. It's 2. Ergo 4 drive wheels. Ergo 100% more drive wheels. It's the most basic of basic math.

>2 drive wheels
>x100%
>=2
>2(original) + 2 (the x100%)
>=4
>4 drive wheels is literally 100% more than 2 drive wheels.

So, 50%, 100% and 200% are all correct.

OK got it.

Nuh-uh
See We're all correct, numbnuts.

>too stupid to understand the difference between DRIVE wheels and wheels

KYS. They are two completely different statements. The math is the same.

>Buying a new underpowered JDM shitbox for the same price as a low-mileage 5 year old Shelby with twice the horsepower

Oh shit faggot what are you doing?!

>it has twice the horsepower at the same price!

but it's twice as boring.

>no jdm market for parts
into the trash it goes

my mom says civics are for girls now

yes you sarcastic retard they are correct

wait so if 2+2=4 then how does 4x 50% =4?