The root to evil, mankind or religion?

If religion is the tool used to create evil in the word, how come mankind is too blame for the existence of evil?
this was an ongoing debate in my theology class yesterday, and some of the students wouldn't accept the fact that religion, not mankind, is the cause of evil in this world.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Well this seems like a bait thread but fuck it. Man is free to pick his actions because he has free will , said actions can be good or evil.

Bam, fucking done mate. Religion has no action or will as it is not living, it is merely a collection of people striving towards their beliefs. Thus religion is not the cause of evil in the world as it has no free will but rather the will of the people that follow it. Man on the other hand has free will and can pick good or evil actions.

Chimps go to war FOR FUN meaning sadistic violence is innnate in humans. Gorillas and Orangs dont do the shit chimps do meaning around 7 million years ago our ancestor mutated a gene that gives them dopamine rushs when they inflict violence on anything they see.

this is ridiculous. The fact that people can practice religion peacefully proves that it isn't religion that causes man to be evil. Sure some religious doctrine can excite people more easily than other things but it isn't religion per se, religion isn't a tangible thing.

Remote Jewish ancestry

Pure blooded Hebrew

Good goy

Recent Jewish ancestry

what the hell am I reading?

I refuse to believe this autism exists in anywhere outside of ribbit and bait threads, let alone a theology class

>If religion is the tool used to create evil in the word

reddit.com

Religion promote hate-life values, but yeah, humans create religion and people without religion can be evil depending in what moral compass you advocate for.

It all depends in your moral system, what do you call evil and good.

Uh, because it's mankind who follows religion in the first place. It's not a living thing that can act on its own. Without people following it religion can't do anything...

Hate-life values? What do you mean by this?

religion is a coping mechanism once you face your failure of your life, just like other contrived fantasizes, your faith in the scientific method included.


Religions are meant to leave material-bodily hedonism, travels, concerts, foods, sex and so on, for a spiritual hedonism, through prayers for theists and mediation for atheists.
Plenty of material hedonist love to think of themselves as less hedonistic than they are, since it improves their hedonism in thinking that they are not animals...most people who claim to be religious are not all, it is just the way they are.

>all four men are anti-religious
>yet they're all just as spooked as the faithful

really makes you think

It really depends. You have religious people who understand the message, and you have religious people telling you what they heard from someone else.

Religion can be used for bad, oppression, and war, but it is not the source of evil. Religion is supposed to bring a person to God, but is now used to control other opinions about God. It is the people who use religion for lawlesness, rather than the lawlessness itself, because the "religion invented evil" meme, is only a meme, because the abstract term religion does not create evil, the evil person who uses religion to create evil, creates the evil.

Mankind's active seperation from "religion" has a good side (trust in the self) and a bad side (loses all information about God in every Holy Book).

>Sam Harris
>schollar
kek
>Dennet
>philosopher
No. His works consists mostly on philsophical divulgation

>Dawkins
>scientist
too bad he spends more time talking about things that are not science

>Hitchens
>Hitchens.
Hitchens.
Nuff said.

>shitposting even harder than OP

Wew, lad.

it's all true

>Chimps go to war FOR FUN meaning sadistic violence is innnate in humans.
Kek no. It is purposeful.
Kek is on your side, my son. May his spirit guide you.

>Man is free to pick his actions because he has free will

>anti-religious
They're just the latest branch of puritanism. You notice that New Atheism isn't really a thing outside of countries with a history of low church protestantism.

Read Nietzsche senpai
People that seek redention, salvation and a new life outside of the one thats already given to them only tells you that they hate life and everything humans create, only what gods create have real value, that why you hear "thats a social construct" like if its not worth shit, they need a guy in the clouds to tells them what its good or wrong because no men have the right to say it, be a mediocre and you will be okay.
Yeah you are right, the things is, whatever you choose to do that help you go on with your life its okay, theres is no meaning of life, only the one that you decide to give a shit for, your family, religion, knowledge, politics, ideology, nothing its intrinsic, value its only really backed by pure will.

> New Atheism isn't really a thing outsid
This is because there is an old atheism in places with more weak religious pressure.

>weak religious pressure
That's an odd way to describe the Catholic Church and Islamic World.

> atheism
> in Islamic World
Catholics aren't that autistic as protestants.

>hate-life
epic meme

Exactly. New Atheism is just Protestant autism taken to a new length.

>Remove Pope, that's the source of all evil and superstition
>Remove Saints, that's the source of all evil and superstition
>Remove Stained Glass, that's the source of all evil, and superstition

etc. etc.

Eventually you've got nothing left, and autism keeps digging.

>Kek no. It is purposeful.
Yh monkey thats what you tell yourself when you shot those innocent humans in Iraq right?

Hate-Life 3 is cancelled.

>spiritual hedonism