Now that the dust has settled, manual or auto?

Now that the dust has settled, manual or auto?

manual for the experience
auto for getting places

I Choose shit posting since this is a bait thread.

...

I like to believe somebody made this unironically

Never underestimate the stupidity of the common man

If I want to go fast or don' want to be bothered automatic
If I have time to kill, want to go fast (straight line only) or I'm bored manual

If I want to feel like Dagumi manual

If I want to feel like Michael Schumacher, auto with DCT

kek

either for it doesn't fucking matter if you're not shit

the only case where auto is objectively better is when you suck at manual because you have girl legs and a girl brain

this

Kek for life

>fuel efficiency
Manual, it always allows shortshifting, coasting in neutral and engine-off-coasting.
>performance
Unless the car is verry new and expensive, the manual will outperform the auto.
Good DCTs can outperform manuals, but are not used in affordable cars.
>price
Manuals are cheaper to buy in the first place and require less maintainance.
>lazyness
You need to shift yourself in manuals, so this one goes autos.

to be fair dct is superior to manual if we're including that

Only poorfags drive manual. No real car even offers it anymore. It's just for boy racers with no power shitboxes. The only clutches that should ever be operated are by hand. Manuals will soon be a thing of the past ICEcuck.

>dct is superior to manual
They can be, but not always are.
Some don´t allow shifting close to redline, some don´t allow shortshifting and some are just slow.

there really is no need for stick shift in the city, stickshift in deadlock traffic is such a pain. But if you live somewhere where there is no traffic then stick definatly wins

...

>driving a car in deadlocked traffic
There is your misstake, the fastest way in deadlocked traffic is on two wheels with a manual...

This is a shitty argument now these days. They both have their uses in their separate applications.
>Performance vs Economy

Now lets get serious now.
CVT vs DCT

>there really is no need for a penis. I just buy my girlfriend the biggest black guy i can find and just let that do all the work.

>stick is a pain

This is where we differ.

I don't have a problem with it. Then again, I drive a corolla and not a boyracermobile with a heavy ten puck stage 4.5 drift clutch and depowered steering.

Bike manuals are so easy that five year old girls can operate them flawlessly

Also that's illegal and your 50cc isn't fast enough to beat the cops' VFRs

>DCT
Basicly 2 automatised manual gearboxes on the the same input and output shafts.
therefore mechnicly relieable and verry efficient.
Issue: clutch wear on clutch for uneven gears
>CVT
Can choose any gear ratio in its range but is less eficcient.
Issues:
Depending on the type of CVT there are different issues, but all of them wear out faster and are less efficient than a standard manual.

>Bike manuals are so easy that five year old girls can operate them flawlessly
The transmission itself maybe, but you have to be verry cautios with the clutch on 50ccm bikes, especialy carbed ones.
Stalling the engine happens verry easy.
>that's illegal
Not where I live, as long as you don´t go fast.
>honda VFR outrunns this
1. doesn´t matter since not illegal
2. not even nearly as nimble and 70km/h is plenty in deadlocked traffic

>not nearly as nimble
If you know how to ride, they're nimble enough for city traffic. Tiny 50cc featherweights with two foot wheelbases can't use the full extent of their small turning circle outside of parking lots, at least not well enough to escape someone on a bike that accelerates faster and brakes harder

1. I don´t need to escape
2. my bike is more narrow and therefore fits better between cars in deadlocked traffic
3. I can utilise the addiditional nimbleness when navigating across deadlocked traffic

>accelerates faster
Only after 2nd gear
>brakes harder
Nope, my low weight helps me a lot with that.