Modern nomenclature is bullshit

>AMG C63
>4.0L

>E350
>3.0L

>335i
>3.0L

>911 turbo
>the regular 911 is aready turbocharged

>T5, T6
>has 4 cylinders

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=p2eYFTC7jwo
autotrader.com/car-reviews/2003-2011-volvo-xc90-used-car-review-105629
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>A5
>isn't a 1:2 scale A3

dumb frogposter

...

>yuropoor "luxury" cars larping as having bigger displacement
fucking pathetic

...

Nomenclature sucks

Pic related

>american
>luxury

Lmao, pick one you diabetic yankee retard.

GM is even worse

>1SS
>2SS
>1LE
>2LE
>ZL1
>ZR1
>GTXTDISMALLPENIS
>NIGGERFAGGOTHANGYOURSELF

all sound the same and only an actual autist would care enough to try to distinguish any of them

not an argument
keep pretending your car has more displacement than it does if it makes you happy though :^)
>damage control

>ecoboost in grampa mobile

so this is the origin of yuropoor debadging

...

>911 turbo
>the regular 911 is aready turbocharged
at least it doesn't lie like the rest

>press shot

Here is a pic IRL :^)

your point? Also that's a different color scheme.

How the hell is any of that damage control

He's trying to make the yuropoor misleading nomenclature look less bad

What do you expect from typical GM shill?

>hurr look at what happens to cars when there's a moron who can't drive behind the wheel

...

>lap times with a misaligned car which don't even have anything to do with the conversation taking place

>people are so triggered by GM cars they make pictures like this

>unironically posting worst emma

...

GM seems more reasonable than some of the others out there

news flash, Veeky Forums - auto manufacturers are marketing sports cars to consumers with only a rudimentary understanding of automechanics.

>unironically posting fake emma
>mfw even emily is a better emma than worst emma who can't even drive

youtube.com/watch?v=p2eYFTC7jwo
>it holds 85 liters even though it's a 4.2 liter which really confuses me over time because I have no idea what I'm talking about
>it's a 4.2 liter car but it has 85 liters of fuel which i think is quite impressive

We get to enjoy 316d, not 335i, that is the true source.

This hurt me to watch

he actually knows his shit knowadays, at least the basic stuff. He's come a long way. I don't know him but I'm proud of the guy. Also last time I checked he had sold the R8 and got a Gallardo, idk what he drives now.

I thought it was because of the high trims that were seen as bragging and shunned upon. So it's a big ruse to get away with buying the base model and other people thinking it's the top of the line one?

>sold the R8 and got a Gallardo

He got the same exact car again?

but 850 and v70 T5's had an i5 in them

kek
his R8 was a V8 though

>A class
>isn't the best

>Any BMW but M series
What's the point?

>paying racer tax instead of taking a regular BMW and making it better than a M
Fucking M cars are just the regular ones with boltons

>Audi TT
>doesn't have twin turbo

current Volvo T5 engines don't have i5s

retards
way to miss the point
the names in the OP used to be meaningful

Yeah well Audi's names also used to be meaningful.

You know, back when Quattro actually meant an all wheel drive

it still does, but now it can be Haldex with a transverse engine which is bullshit

yeah, now it refers to how many 0's are gonna be on your repair bill

VAG fangirls on suicide watch

So not an AWD.

but it is
a shitty one, but it's all wheel drive

It's FWD, user.

It's not. Not since the second generation, it's permanent 4x4.

>Not since the second generation, it's permanent 4x4.
What? It's not, they just improved the moment where the second axle kicks in.

>GT
>not a grand tourer

many brands are guilty of this bullshit

it's directing some torque to the rear all the time, 95F-5R if I recall correctly

I'm gonna need some source on that because it sounds like bullshit desu

autotrader.com/car-reviews/2003-2011-volvo-xc90-used-car-review-105629

>differential lock
>it's actually braking the spinning wheel

Shit, user you were right. Does this apply to all the Haldex systems or only RWD high performance ones?

Pretty sure it's generation 2 onwards. Still people with them say they feel like a FWD with more traction to drive.
If I was in the market for a AWD car I'd probably get a 4matic, Audi can get fucked with their FWD-based designs and their understeer.

>Audi can get fucked with their FWD-based designs and their understeer.
this, only a cuckold would buy an Audi
I was talking the other day to a guy with a Panamera Turbo and neither of us can understand why people buy A8s when a base A8 costs the same as a base Panamera which isn't a FWD-based piece of shit

>america
>luxury

lol

pfffffttttttt
America TAUGHT companies like Mercedes what luxury means. They were making this ugly POS while Cadillac was making the De Ville. Don't even bother comparing the interiors.

Are those fucking VW Beetle indicators?

>when your so-called luxury car looks worse than the commie cars of the same year
seriously wtf

>this delusional

lol

>talking about Mercedes
>posts a bugatti atlantic

>this kills the yuropoor

nope, I was strictly talking about american cars, the one you posted is still newer

sorry but it's europe the one who taught america how to do luxury

lel, when Bugatti was founded Cadillac already had 7 years in the market.
Oh and BTW that Benz DOES look worse than the commiemobiles of '59, the GAZ Chaika M13 and the ZIL 111. No delusion there. And let's not forget the Duesenbergs.

>ettore bugatti's poor take on the 540k autobahnkourier

>Cadillac already had 7 years in the market.
and mercedes is even older than cadillac, so...

And yet they couldn't figure out luxury until Cadillac appeared

>Mfw I still have a true Volvo modern t5

Get fucked, frogposter. This isn't /b/ for fuck's sake, this shit doesn't belong here.