/5N@F/ General

Thanks Mizu, I love it. That Mangle is too cute.

Oh hey, you actually drew a giraffe. I was only joking about that, but thanks for drawing it anyways.

That's honestly not bad, she'd make a great artist so long as she keeps practicing and doesn't have something awful happen like say, get horribly disassembled by raving children to the point that just speaking becomes a chore over the roar of endless radio static sputtering from what was once a proper, functioning voicebox.

...

Hope you guys are enjoying your Saturday evening, this is the last and final repost till I finish the fourth and final chapter of Inside My Shoes if you haven't had the chance to see it yet:

Day 3 (Ch. 3): : docs.google.com/document/d/1IJ65M2Q3uSKCrjjHigs9GGrzeceoPXwAlg-qkO7lp9I/edit?usp=sharing

And for those that want to get into my FNAF1 tale, here is night 1 (Ch. 1): docs.google.com/document/d/1juJpdtm3S9B8EmQZwja4d4DaC4UqnQcRZBW_QbPUV8I/edit?usp=sharing

Night 2 (Ch. 2): docs.google.com/document/d/1zTIsE3HHb_cHf-K8viwMl7RCl7Kq41Y4FREbYWUptlU/edit?usp=sharing

Explain that monstrosity on the burro.

>booru
>a small donkey

What, did Vawfag's fursona get dragged into this or something?

It's the Circus every day!

Well the plush is sentient, but was acquired by some form of sexual deviant who wanted to use the toy for sexual relief rather than the innocent playtime the toy expected from its owner. The toy shows reluctance at the thought of engaging in mature acts with its owner, but over time it appears the toy was either forced to comply or an agreement was made, because in said image, you can see the tail-end of the arrangement as said owner ejaculates over the tail and back of said plush. Hopefully this explanation cleared up any confusion.

Well I would hope it wasn't by force. That'd be uncalled for.

For every Andy, there's always a Sid.

>Not giving the bunny plush a plush carrot.
>Not having a good friend forever and giving it hugs.
>Not enjoying her being a little cutie.
Worst owner.

Me and Fansmut did a lil art trade. This is my half.

5naf.booru.org/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=41220

Rape is rude, dude.

>cute hand puppets

I approve

ded

GAME THEORY: What if Ennard was just a mouse?

I don't see him on the mouse thread on /trash/, so no.

Mizu started drawing this on my computer but hates my tablet, so I inked it for her.

She's so cute, holy fuck

Do you think every mouse that has ever existed appears on a furry porn thread?

Sy here. I started that story in September and then dropped it. It stayed unfinished on my Pastebin since. However, at some point in February my Pastebin for whatever reason decided to set all my pastes to Public and I had to fix that. It also wouldn't have been the only unfinished story that people might have seen there during that time. I don't remember when in February this was, and I don't know how long my pastes were like that for.

I finally went back and started working on the story near the end of March, and when I posted it at the beginning of this month is when it was actually done. This is also why if you look at my list of OCfaggotry the story is listed at the bottom of the writefaggotry section. It's genuinely a newer story than the greentext. Were I to finish the other unfinished story I currently have on my Pastebin, it would be a similar deal where the created date is old. Hell, the other unfinished story's created date is even older actually. Although I guess in the future I could avoid something like this happening by just deleting and remaking the story.

I'm sorry for the confusion, user.

I hope that if 6 is more sci-fi, it's sci-fi horror instead of just sci-fi.

I don't really understand what the point of any of the sci-fi elements of SL were, since you could've just as easily done it with a group of animatronics programmed to stuff kids.

ghost wants to fuck plushes

Damn that's good.

And that's CUTE.

Keep up the good work you two.

I adore this picture mostly because of the memorable filename. It will likely rank up there with "man gets dangerously close to faggy rabbit" and the lesser known "fexy sniffs a book".

Why Veeky Forums ban system is so lame?

>new game theory
>still taking the book as the same canon when it's explicitly not
>IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS FICTIONAL ANIMATRONIC WAS ABLE TO BITE THIS KID WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW ANIMATRONICS WORK

I don't...I can't...

His being totally retarded wouldn't be so bad if he weren't so goddamned smug. Also if he didn't call his 20 solid minutes of being an idiot "the smartest show about gaming"

What a tool

What did you honestly expect.

He forgot that a main part of a THEORY is that it's only just a theory, not the actual story.

He think that whatever he says is the truth when in reality his theories hold no more chance of being true then someone on Reddit's theory. Conveniently, this is where he gets most of his ideas from.

The funny part about him thinking that he is right and can solve the lore, Scott only said that he did a good job on the Fnaf 2 theory video, none of the others. And even then he said that he still got things wrong.

This new video just proves that he doesn't know what he is talking about anymore.

The one smart thing MatPat has ever done was call out Scott on how batshit stupid the lore's become

The mods or the actual banning system?

The book can be kind of referential, because elements of it ended up in other games. Twisted Ones' basic synopsis of "killer robots being sent out from somewhere" might be part of FNAF 6, for instance.

MatPat is a retard, though. He doesn't understand anything about story. He also thinks Bethesda created Fallout, and cried after people shat on him for the Undertale stuff.

He's like a B-grade VaatiVidya, except at least Vaati stole his ideas from a relatively intelligent community.

I don't think he did any of the like. He's still deadset on the idea that Scott had everything planned out from the beginning, as is most of the fanbase outside of here. The only time he called Scott out on anything was when he was going on about how a Bite couldn't actually give you dreams or hallucinations, and that THIS is his fatal mistake.

>I don't think he did any of the like.
He spent like the first five minutes of the Follow the EYES video doing that. It was buried in the assertion that "nobody knows FNAF for certain better than ME and I spent so much of MY time researching the TRUTH", but it was still a worthy callout of Scott's lore being unsatisfying and broken.

Out of all the places for this series to have a fandom this has to be the strangest.

Veeky Forums is a diverse place, there is literally an entire board dedicated to folding paper

That's because you're thinking about it in terms of what the fandom has become, not what it started as.

To be fair the first game deserved the hype. Not because it was particularly amazing, but because horror games as a whole were just dogshit for years and this was a breath of fresh air.

It turned into something really dumb though, both the game series and the fandom.

I agree that the first game was a breath of fresh air. The tension in FNAF 1 is amazing. I think it sort of fell to bits after that. Keeping up with the lore is difficult., it's all over the place.

The first game was genuinely good. I think the series worsened when Scott saw how many kids were latching onto the lore and characters, and started to cater to them instead of sticking to horror and creepy animatronics.

Keep in mind being constantly exposed to something will dull it's effects on you. Like how after you watch a horror movie enough times you are not scared by it anymore.

Not saying that the series hasn't dwindled, but that constant exposure will diminish the effects that something has on you.

There was a good bit of backlash to FNAF 2 as I remember. Weaver's filibuster on the gameplay stands out, and while people did like the Purple character, the Puppet and "it was the Bite of 87 in 1987" part was received worse.

People did like 2 for the waifus, though. And it wasn't until 4 that the story got REALLY fucked up. Still, 2 was noted a disappointment.

I may be wrong about this but wasn't most people expectations for Fnaf 2 that it would be a direct sequel to Fnaf 1 and most wanted guards that may or may not have been suited to come back in some way? Though if I remember the phone calls correctly, it's mentioned that most leave on the second or third night, assuming that Phone Guy is not lying.

>Weaver's filibuster
Was it just that gif or more to it?
The gameplay in Fnaf 2 is horrific, but at the same time if it needed a reason for you to remove the mask or the game would be easy.

The Puppet was negatively received because it confirmed that it was dead kids, even though Scott heavily hinted at that in Fnaf 1.

>"it was the Bite of 87 in 1987"
Why would the Bite of 87 not be in 1987?

And most sequels to anything are noted as a disappointment. Expecting Fnaf 2 to not disappoint in anyway is just dumb.

The bait-and-switch sequel/prequel was the start of the convoluted lore. Could have been smoothed out in the next game, but instead Scott fell into the Lost plot abyss of writing questions without knowing the answers.

Also what the fuck captcha why do I have to do this photoshop select box bullhonkey.

>Could have been smoothed out in the next game, but instead Scott fell into the Lost plot abyss of writing questions without knowing the answers.
But it was. 3 was fine and tied things up nicely.
Things could have been left at that and there would be no troubles. What you're talking about is what happened with 4.

Actually, people's expectations for 2 weren't that high. It was mostly just that it'd be a sequel that built upon the first game. The prequel nature was a twist decided upon during development, as opposed to being planned from the start. This also contributes to it's more patchwork feeling.

Fireden's down at the moment, but Weaver deconstructed why 2 wasn't as good as the first game in a series of posts examining the game. It's inherently flawed, as the breakneck speed of the gameplay relies a lot on trial and error RNG. It's not like the first game, where being inches away from death was only if you fucked up and let the robots get too close. It abandoned tension and atmosphere for a more in-your-face approach, which also reflects in the character designs, which abandoned the uncanny, subdued nature of the original game for the scary monsters vibe. The Alien siren was pretty neat on paper, but was overused to the point of becoming background noises.

The Puppet was received poorly beyond just the mechanic because he wasn't a part of the original game's story, but was retrofitted to be a part of it anyways, for the sake of an explanation. Making things messy. People also thought he took away from the mystery of the original by being a pretty pointless explanation that contradicted himself. If he's there to explain why kids possess animatronics, then why is he a kid possessing an animatronic? The series was better off without him, keeping the dead kids to a nice and tidy number.

The "Bite of 87" bit is referential to that being the main focus of the game. Going off of the FNAF 1 cutscenes and the presence of "mike" in the files, Scott had a different plan for the game before he changed it into a prequel, that used the "Bite of 87" as it's plot twist. This kind of writing, with non-commitment to the story and pulling mulligans, is what screwed things up. Writing two games about a Bite for the "gotchya!" plot twist moments echoes of M Night Shyamalan.

>expecting Fnaf 2 to not disappoint in anyway is just dumb
There should be some expectancy of quality, right? Alien, Hellraiser, Halloween, and dozens of other movies in the same genre as FNAF all showed that you can make a good sequel to a horror story. FNAF 2 being "good but not as good as FNAF 1" wouldn't have been as bad as FNAF 2 being a bad game all around. You can't really say "well, a lot of movies are bad too" when someone criticizes a bad film.

>yfw there are still people who are certain that FNAF2 is a sequel

There are still people who think Scott plans out the entire series, and that things like Springtrap's identity or Fredbear biting a child are not only good plot twists, but were also planned from the beginning.

God, the Flintstones comic is baller as fuck.

It really is.

Why is she so perfect?

>she
user..

I think the kids already have her hip.

Well it's a good thing Afton remade her into Yiffy the Yak-Bak, then. Now she can speak to kids in every manner of saturday morning cartoon and action movie character there is, which is sure to make their Charlotte Hornets caps spin right off their heads.

...

...

>filename
It's like gay pride in slow motion.

I'm only homosexual for Freddy.

Draw more stock animatronics acting sexy.
I want to see Mangle and Toy Chica grinding their nonexistent genitals.

It's not moving though.

Damn it Marty you can't keep coming here /v/ will get jealous.

...

Scariest moment in all FNAF

It should be illegal to be this gay.

Scott's kids are like fucking Rod and Todd, I swear.

Explain this you fucking degenerate.

...

This is all I could think of when I saw the comic.
Sorry.

...

That user is clearly kissing a Freddy on the mouth, which is what all of us here in this thread on Veeky Forums enjoy doing very, very much on a regular basis.

Excuse you, my mouth is reserved for dick.

You inspired me, user

...

ded thred

...

It's cum. It's always cum. Never get the Special Sauce.

Maybe Scott is so sexually repressed that getting a boner from an adorable robot fox trap scared him senseless?

>Was planed to be a sequel
Other then the "Grand Reopening" thing from the first teaser, nothing else indicated a direct sequel, though that teaser is confusing anyways because it was a more beat up version of Freddy being used for a reopening.

>Weaver
iirc, he didn't even like the first Fnaf either and made a lengthy statement on his tumblr on why Fnaf 1 was a bad game. Not saying that there are not flaws with Fnaf 2, but even as highly praised Fnaf 1 is around here, weaver still didn't like the game.

>The Puppet
He and BB were planed for the first game but he couldn't figure out a way to add them in, so he left them out and instead put them in Fnaf 2. Also when you go into the past of a story there are bound to be more characters and some that effect the story. Saying that he is bad because he was added into the story's past is saying that and person added into a story's past is bad unless they were mentioned beforehand.

>Fnaf 1 cutscenes in Fnaf 2
That could have been Scott's way of showing that the dead kids in Fnaf 2 are still alive in the Fnaf 1 animatronics. And "mike" being in the files could also be explained by the fact that Scott has said that he hides things in the filenames to fuck with people, as he knows that his games get data mined.

I meant more in the terms of Scott has only himself to make the story and can't bounce ideas off of anyone. And that he being an indie developer, has to look at trends if he wants to succeed as he has nothing to fall back on if he fails. I didn't mean that because it's a sequel that it's going to suck, just that expecting something made by one guy who never planed to have this be as successful as it ended up being who made this partly out of spite to a bad review he got to Chipper and Sons and expecting it to be in everyway better is a bit of a stretch. I will say that the game did need more polish though and that he should have taken his time with it like he did for SL and Fnaf 1.

Weaver only cares about jumping on the next bandwagon.

People always say this, but the evidence doesn't seem to back it up.
He still draws FNaF stuff sometimes, just not here. And he bailed from Undertale pretty quick due to a lack of creative drive.
Seems to me that he's drawing Zootopia stuff because he gets more out of it than any other fandom. I can't fault him for that.

>fnaf was big new thing
>weaver
>zootopia is new hotness
>weaver ditches fnaf for that
You're right it doesn't add up.
>because he gets more out of it than any other fandom.
Protip: Weaver says that about every new fandom.

...

Alright, you're clearly either shitposting or irrationally spiteful if this is how you try to make a counterpoint. Either way, you're not worth talking to.

Zootopia was the next the next bandwagon months and months ago. Now it's old and busted. Yet he still rides it. Weaver isn't a trendwhore. Otherwise he'd be drawing JJBA and Yakuza and Bendy shit. But he isn't. Because he's just a furfag.

I will never understand you "artists can only make art for one media ever or else they're a dirty whore and cheating on the first media they ever drew for".

Weaver's pretty reputable as an artist who wanders around He's a furfag through and through, and lets his dick guide him. That's not to say he's a bad person, he's just less committed or interested in FNAF than the OCfags who've stuck around are.

>tfw want to git gud at drawing but every time I try to draw something I'm immediately discouraged and ball up the paper

You and me both. >inb4 You'll never guess who

Fight through it or just set it aside to fiddle with later over time as practice.

I'm gonna guess Rugrats

Add another to that.

I want to git gud at writing but nothing turns out right.
I can't draw a circle so I've never considered drawing.

Have you tried drawing a face and erasing some of the details