Just ignore it and pretend it's not there, don't directly reply to him because he loves the attention. He comes into slow/low-pop generals and shits that spider out everywhere. Just forget him and hope he moves on. This isn't the only general he's done it to.
Julian Watson
>being this much of a newfag
Hudson Brooks
Anyone got screenshots of the Prethoryn or Unbidden slowly winning against the galaxy? I want to feel some dread
Jordan Perez
>Be the Qu.
>Be the second greatest genetic engineers in the galaxy.
>Mod yourself into a flying tapeworm.
I wish Biological Ascension let you change portraits as well as traits.
I also wish you could rename species.
What I'm saying is, I want to gene-mod my slave species into my main species and spread 'humanity' throughout the galaxy like a holy blessing.
Jeremiah Campbell
Moron.
Connor Davis
>just got The Coming Storm in my Emperium of Man run IT'S TIME
IMO Brazil is much more of a threat on water maps due to their lolships that cost no coal
equip Maritime Industries, spam a bunch of Quadriremes while rushing Nationalism then pop in Professional Army and upgrade those suckers for instant mid-game rape (skipping the frigate stage makes the upgrade cheaper in total)
Jordan Thompson
>again
Daniel Wilson
A lot more passive than I expected
Cameron Cook
You literally did this to yourself
Jaxson Hall
>again
Sebastian Watson
Holy shit, every time.
Julian Butler
Yikes!
That's awesome!
Nicholas Powell
>5910 relation The top I got was -400.
Asher Martinez
I'm playing with an AI personality mod. The bulk of that is from the Psychotic Hordes personality.
Luke Walker
So what is that personality type, Fanatical Purifier but full retard?
Isaiah Cook
>mod All interest dropped.
Jeremiah Wright
Now that's my type of butterfly!
Kayden Foster
Spider faggot
Daniel Torres
It's probably Fanatical Purifier with some extra civic or trait requirement, yes.
Everything else about them is vanilla, though.
Benjamin Foster
NOT OP, Theses are the mods that i've got installed.
What do you think?
Also, What's the quickest way to get AI to declare war on you while your in a defense pact?
Kevin Clark
He never was. Don't take your wish for reality.
Justin Collins
Just turn fleet stance to Passive, you damned memeist.
Asher Phillips
These people posting their passive fleet hypermemes will never outdo this shit
>forget you set fleet stance to passive >science ship stumbles into amoebas when surveying
Thomas Collins
>Mosquitoes We don't know what you mean buddy, if you don't say it.
Michael Jackson
Bitch please.
And that's not even hyperlane.
Carson Hernandez
Except it's evasive again m8, nothing is stopping your warp from going west then northwest then to your target, all in 3 jumps.
Noah Bennett
NEVER FORGET, nigger.
Connor Sanders
this one is just you being retarded
Ryder Stewart
God DAMN it I love wormholes
Carson Butler
It's just some underage autist, don't mind him.
Carson Perry
>being this much of a newfag
Gabriel Powell
Not an argument
Brayden Peterson
>people don't play hyperlanes only >people don't rush psi and grab psi jump drives to run rings around hyperspace plebs >people don't create black ops psi jump fleets to ruin the enemy economy while distracting them with a conventional fleet
Kevin Smith
>spiderbro arrives >all retards immediately get triggered Good.
Kevin Garcia
all of this can be done with wormhole
Jaxon Morris
Try reading his post dipshit
Noah Edwards
What are the best civics in Stellaris? Which ones should be avoided at all costs?
Benjamin Robinson
I like Efficient Bureaucracy and Cutthroat Politics Warrior Culture a shit
Nathan Wood
Also wormhole can actually be pretty bad for this in the wrong situation.
Wormhole scales badly with bigger and bigger fleets, sure, small fleets will jump fast, but jump fleets can move freely and have a fixed jump time.
Rushing construction ships into enemy territory works pretty well against retarded AI, but against human players you will have a lot of trouble if they have even a slight fleet advantage because they'll be smart and simply wipe your wormhole stations
If you pick a pacifist xenophobe (spiritualist works well with this) you can combine agrarian idyll and inward perfection.
It's COMPLETELY fucking broken and makes tall empires insanely powerful because you can complete 4-5 Unity trees before a normal human player has 1-2 full at least.
Cooper Thomas
>h-hyperlane only!! I did.
Jack Reed
I avoid shadow council, warrior culture, stratocracy and inwards perfection. The first 3 are just really shit since the things they grant can be easily gotten elsewhere. InPe is just tooooo powerful right now.
Justin Sanchez
Try playing a REAL game instead of playing "EU4 For Retards".
Daniel White
So how do you propose using wormholes on a hyperlanes only game?
Levi Richardson
>all of this can be done with wormhole
Actually, by definition, no it can't.
David Martinez
Which room works best with a plantoid empire using plantoid cities?
Charles Campbell
Are you using any room mods? If not then probably the Spiritualist or Xenophile one.
Do tall empires even have that many farms? You need like 2-4 farms for a single temple. Or do farms get more unity as they get upgraded?
Jayden Cook
>Why? +5 happiness and +30% unity sounds pretty sweet. He's saying it's too OP for him to consider using it against the AI.
Carter Powell
> You need like 2-4 farms for a single temple
The biggest effect is the early game boost.
Instead of having like, 1-2 unity a turn, you start off with 6 early on.
When playing with human players, by the time my friends have about 10 unity a turn I have upwards of 40-50 and usually am limiting my expansion just a little bit more than usual.
Putting the unity into Discovery, the first perk of Economics and the Exploration tree, you have much higher science output and reduced unity cost from additional pops.
Ryan Jones
>Why? +5 happiness and +30% unity sounds pretty sweet.
I don't choose it because I find it too good. It requires pacifist which is already like 20% unity. 50% unity gain is just far too much. There's another civic that's just 15% unity but it's kinda bad compared to inwards. IP is getting nerfed tomorrow though. Also
>tfw no stellaris while waiting for mods to update
Colton Evans
Haha get fucked space niggers
Xavier Perez
Which room is the Xenophile room?
Aaron Young
The one with the purple curtains.
Daniel James
Jesus fuck...
Elijah Sullivan
Fuck you Mohammed You dare destroyed 2 of my mining drones
Liam Baker
Isn't the real cost of Inwards Perfection that you HAVE to be both Xenophobic and Pacifist to get it?
Brandon Perez
Pschht, islamophobe...
Colton Nguyen
Hardly a cost though really. Xenophobe's really good due to the border range and pacifist grants more unity. All you really lose is a little bit if diplomatic clout and the ability to cede planets. You can still liberate and vassalize people through war.
Gabriel Long
Update on the human 2way Everyone got defense pacts up the ass and nothing happened, ever Everyone except the alien third wheel to the north, for some stupid reason the UN declared war on them Their fleet is 100% disruptors
This was a letdown already
Lincoln Carter
Could be worse. He could be arachnophobe.
Jacob Young
Should I adopt the Supremacy-tree just for the sake of connecting Naboo to the rest of my empire? I've allready researched the 20% Border Range. Or are there any other techs that give you more range?
Adam Phillips
Delete your fleet I suppose?
Caleb Diaz
>collectivist pacifist >implying you can keep people working with no incentive for self-advancement nor the threat of force
Angel Nelson
You're not fanatically pacifistic or xenophobic, so it's actually not that relevant.
Plus, using this strat, you don't want to cede planets anyway, generally liberation and establishing vassalisation/protectorate/pacts are good enough.
Noah Ward
You are literally the most hated poster in this general, Kumo-kun.
Isaac Morales
not true with how much I hate myself
Liam Kelly
>late medieval primitives on a planet filled with spiders
How horrifying
Sebastian Green
>tfw want 1.6 to come out already
Noah Taylor
>implying you can keep people working with no incentive for self-advancement nor the threat of force
Pacifism in Stellaris doesn't mean the state doesn't have any kind of monopoly on force. Pacifist empires still have armies and navies.
It more refers to using violence to achieve goals, but it's quite easy to rationalise pacifism by calling those who resist the actual violent ones and any violence used in response is just rightful self defense.
Ethics in Stellaris are allowed to be hypocritical because we know from humans that hypocrisy is pretty important/central to most societies.
Cooper Anderson
So you admit you're samefagging. Good to know.
They must be all badasses to survive. Conscript them in your armies.
Aiden Williams
Welcome to Middle Earth, motherfucker
Isaac Flores
>implying you can't
Nathan Allen
Pacifist doesn't mean you can't force them at gunpoint. It just means you won't strike first.
Thomas Torres
Man, Insane is impossible.
Enemys can research high tier research while your still twirling your thumbs.
Oliver Reed
You have to use broken mechanics (like idyllic + inward) or cheat the AI.
Bentley Russell
>Paradox can't make better IA so they just make it cheat more GEE WHO WOULD'VE THOUGHT
Jace Jackson
>idyllic + inward ??
Gabriel Anderson
Right now, I'm thinking the only way to survive is to whore yourself to every friendly AI to get protection and research.