>Good organizations
I never said The Institute were good though.
You are arguing against something that was never brought up.
Why do you seem so hell bent on using straw man instead of actually debating the argument?
>A. the wastelanders don't actually pose a threat to the institute
Actually they did, as The Minutemen existed all the way back then, as we are told several times that the Minutemen fought The Insittue in the past.
And, as we see in-game, The Minutemen could very well beat The Institute given enough of The Commonwealth rallying behind them.
>B they replaced a few random people with no strategic value
They replaced the Mayor of Diamond City, which gives them complete control over the largest settlement in the entire northern third of the East Coast.
They replaced Roger Warwick, the owner of the farm sitting on the best and most fertile land in The Commonwealth, giving them control over the best farm in the region.
And they replaced a guy in Goodneighbor, which let them spy on the largest hotbed of anti-Institute sentiment in the region.
All of those are logical replacements.
> C. they could have monitored the surface without killing people.
They do, via watcher crows.
But you need agents who are able to do shit i ncasey ou spot a threat. Noticing a possible threat via watcher crows means nothing if you don't have human, or synth, agents, to stop it.
>We, as players, don't actually know if the institute blasted everyone. We are not given definitive conclusive stuff from the game.
Except we do, in both the University Point and Broken Mask Incidents we have clear knowledge of why they happened, and either was because The Institute just wanted to kill people.
You are just ignoring everything that proves you wrong in favor of beating around the bush.