How accurate is this?
How accurate is this?
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
if this is 1960-1974 then
Ford
Chrysler
AMC
GM
Where Is Corvette
>American Motors
Who?
that is unironically completely accurate
out normie
It depends on the specific model and year of production. Each maker has produced numerous good and bad vehicles.
It would be cool to have one of these with a 390 and a 4 speed. I bet it would really go being such a light car.
They got some cool cars
>Ford
>Great tier
Legit my dream winter vehicle right there. But I can never find one not rusted to shit.
Keep your garbage outside this board, please.
no you
Here's a popular gay porn star's new ride hellcat.
>you will never get pozzed in the back of that hellcat
Why live?
every car from you lardfats are garbage.
What country are you from?
completely true
The cars blacks hid from in 1971.
UAE
This.
Ford truly is better than GM and Chrysler in literally every respect. But AMC was better than all of them, which is why (((they))) put an end to them.
>tfw i want a jeep but its owned by chryshit and everything from fca is bound to break in under 3 years
...
HOMO BTFO
My problem is finding one at all. I'd love to have an SX/4.
>mfw this gen are 1000x better than the last pre-chrysler jeeps
seems like Chrysler is fine but cars actually with jeep or dodge badges tent to have retard in them
which ones the porn star? i can't tell because they are all standing next to a dodge
Very accurate
the hellcat does make you look better, true
my guess is the guy in the hat
the chick is likely the salesman
the suit guy is probably a manager
>Chrysler is fine
My grandmother has a PT Cruiser. It's been mechanically sound for as long as she's owned it. Sure, the interior is composed of cheap plastic, thanks to Mercedes and their overzealous cost-cutting, but the ride quality and handling characteristics are perfectly acceptable for a compact hatchback. I don't understand the hate.
I like how despite devouring so many things and fucking up so many times, Chrysler still managed to get bought out.
twitter.com
***NSFW***
THE MACHINE
Fuck these make me hard.
>TFW no 90s wagon 4x4 that even come close
cute
Make one for the dozen GM sub-brands.
Are you fucking high? The 426, 440, and 340 fucking dominated during that era. Chrysler was literally God tier during the First Horsepower Wars.
They're also the Gods of the current one, having ass raped everything into annihilation with the price for power of the 392 scat pack, Hellcat, Demon, and Viper. They offer a 707 horsepower Jeep, even!
Knock off your dick riding.
>implying the 455 ram air didnt assrape whatever Chrysler tried.
Nigger, it literally didn't. The 426 dominated NASCAR until restrictions were placed on it to make it non-competitive. The 340 outrank every big block in the quarter as well and the 440 crushed the numbers 455 cars put out.
You're fucking retarded.
You faggots know that the first one is supposed to be the best and the last one is the worst right?
I don't think the guy who made this realized that.
my dick is diamonds
How fucking dull are you
60 ft. behind a GT-R :^)
reliability >>>>horsepower
stupid questions, stupid answers
>Chrysler LA and RB engines
>unreliable
Pick one
Re evaluate your life choices my man
>
>My grandmother has a PT Cruiser. It's been mechanically sound for as long as she's owned it. Sure, the interior is composed of cheap plastic, thanks to Mercedes and their overzealous cost-cutting, but the ride quality and handling characteristics are perfectly acceptable for a compact hatchback. I don't understand the hate.
TFW hooning a turbo PT cruiser
can you imagine actually being this stupid
>posts their worst car
In my opinion the Eagle version looks better. At least the '81 and later models, with their integrated bumpers. And call me crazy but I kind of like the vinyl half-roof.
I like them as well. Shame they hold up so poorly in the elements.
>AMC will never return to save Jeep from FCA, then BTFO the Challenger, Mustang, and Camaro with new Javelin
Feels bad man
>implying any Jeeps made after Chrysler dropped AMC engines are worthwhile
From what I hear, the Ziebart rust protection was very inconsistent. Some people say they rotted out the second they left the dealership, others say it's almost rust-free after 35 winters. Inconsistent build quality, AMC's general image as being a car for poorfags, and of course Cash for Clunkers have claimed the lives of many an AMC. What a shame.
Basically this. AMC designs were so idiotically simple that they could not fail.
Back when Chrysler was God-tier:
You mean back when they had less than 10% of the automotive market?
Still; it was their peak. With cars like pic related, they were the most innovative car company
Dig those autism lights.
>Chrysler fanboys actually believe this
>someone is destroying my concept of reality!
>A lifetime of dickriding based on my dad and grandpa's favorite brand is being challenged!
>I can't allow recorded NHRA and NASCAR times to undo the conditioning I've accepted over the years!
>most innovative car company
What was that, sonny? Speak up, I can't hear you over the sound of the first production line car. And the first muscle car. And the first mass produced OHV V8. And the first production turbocharged car, and the first US-made FWD car since the Cord (with a longitudinal 455!), and where was I again?
You forgot their coal dust car.
>mexican built engines
>still slower than a last generation GT500
And the first non-kludged-together-crap automatic transmission.
Just this one- 100% accurate.
pic related, don't care if this is a blue board
that doesn't really make any sense