Why don't we privatize everything?

Including all the functions of government and regulations?

>unaccounted for technocrats will rule the country
What's exactly wrong with that? As long as there is peace and economic stability that's all what matters. A democratic system which changes economic policy every 4 years is just stupid and short sighted.

>there will be more monopolies
The strong trumps the weak. Clearly the monopoly provides a better service than its competitors if it is able reach monopoly status.

>there will be more poor people
I'm sure there would be plenty of opportunities for poor people to get out of poverty rather than relying on welfare. Indentured servitude is one example.

>b-but indentured servitude is bad...!
It would of course be regulated by independent regulators. It serves against the employers interests to create harsh working conditions for their employees. Furthermore I'm sure that Big Pharma would lobby employers to ensure health and safety standards are enforced. A healthy employee is not just a happy and productive worker, but also a cash cow for Big Pharma after all.

So you see Veeky Forums, everything balances out just fine in a privatized free market economy with 0 government interference.

Other urls found in this thread:

vox.com/videos/2017/1/30/14382686/jet-fighter-f35-congress-trump
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because 99% of the populace would be forced to provide basic services they couldn't afford to use.

Then they get all angry and kill the 1% that can afford to live comfortably. Then they set up a government and give themselves the services they otherwise can't afford. Then retards like you pop up and pretend people can afford those services without the government. And the pendulum swings.

>People can't afford to buy things without government redistribution of wealth

You're a fucking idiot. Typically when the poors rise up it's to decapitate the corrupt government because bad government policies have reduced them to eating rats.

because small tyrannical groups would form mafias until they reach status of government all over again.

Retard.

How many miles of road can you personally afford to produce?
how many firefighters can you afford? Policemen? Judges? How much sewer pipe can you personally afford to lay? How deep a well can you afford? What happens to you when your richer neighbor digs one deeper? How large is your personal army, and how are they armed? What kind of Navy and Air Force can you personally field?

you have to join with others to get these things done. And when you do, a government is formed.

sounds good senpai

>muh roads
>muh volunteer services
>muh militia

How did people even survive without big government stealing a third of their shit?

>How did people even survive without big government stealing a third of their shit?
outhouses, oil lamps, dirt floors, horses, farming, having 23 kids and 21 of them die, log cabins, death by flu, never traveling more than 10 miles from their home, never seeing money, malnutrition, gross ignorance, worked to death by 35, constantly being robbed and murdered.

it was glorious.

Wrong.

You having fallen for the classic fallacy of absolutes. Reality is not black or white.

Mafias, like any business, are a profit seeking entity. They profit out of goods and services made illegal by the government but is otherwise desired by some parts of the public. Remove the ban, and mafias would suddenly find themselves out of business or be forced to operate as ordinary businesses.

All of the above are perfectly achievable by private enterprises.

>you have to join with others to get these things done. And when you do, a government is formed.

There is nothing stopping private enterprises from working with each other if it is in their best interests to do so.

If something needs done, the free market will always find a way to get it done in the most efficient way possible.

>but who will pay the firefighters and police?

Funds and trusts set up by private corporations will.

Nice strawman, but what you are clearly describing are the results of actions by incompetent governments setting up incompetent and short sighted regulations and laws to prevent people receiving basic services.

There will always be a demand for law and order to be enforced. It is naive to think that only the government can provide it.