2018 Mustang

>460HP @ 7500RPM
>dual injection and 12:1 compression
>310hp/350ft-lbs for Ecoboost
>10spd auto from ZL1
>aerodynamic tweaks
>magnetic suspension
>active exhaust valves
>12" LCD instrument cluster
>drag mode (V6 is gone
Thoughts?

gm BTFO

>7500rpm

I thought the point of a muscle car is to have low end power.

>he thinks 7500 is high
lmaoing @ pistoncucks

Buy Chevy/Mopar if you want low-end torque. Buy a Euro if you want top-end power. Buy Ford if you want both. Pic related, 580HP/460TRQ/8200RPM.

...

How heavy?

Also
>12" LCD instrument cluster
fuck that why ruin everything

>petrol station

>buying a rental car

>Aluminator

Who the fuck comes up with these names

ikr should have called it THE ALL NEW ALUM-O-TRONIC ENGINE

oh you're an electric fag, on then I like you. Telsa causes massive yuropoor butthurt

American cars are piles of garbage

>MUH V8
>MUH BIG BLOCK

European cars are literally better in every single way. We have advanced engineering, and you people are just fucking neanderthals, too fucking STUPID to advance to the higher planes of automotive engineering

Americans, for some weird reason, only seem to care about going fast in a straight line (yet they're not even the best at that - the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport has the record for fastest production car)

They don't seem to understand the idea of handling at all. They don't understand suspension, they don't understand weight distribution and balance. The first time they built a mid-engined supercar was in the year 2000 - the Saleen S7 - and it was designed, and originally manufactured, by A BRITISH COMPANY!!!

Europeans and Japanese manufacturers are making the most advanced supercars in the world, with turbochargers and hybrid systems to extract MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE in ALL SITUATIONS - in a straight line, round corners, accelerating from standstill, etc.

That's another thing Americans don't really understand - downforce. Do wind tunnels even exist over there? Europeans and the Japanese have been excelling at high downforce cars for fucking donkey's years. We understand that higher downforce = higher cornering speed. But Americans seem to be completely oblivious to this in the design of their """performance""" cars.

For instance, why are Americans incapable of building anything as advanced as the McLaren P1, or the LaFerrari, or the Porsche 918?

America is literally in the stone ages while the rest of the world is pushing at the very frontiers of automotive engineering.

Pic related is a car that is too advanced for Americans to even UNDERSTAND, let alone build.

*wins Le Mans*

>2 seconds slower than a dump truck with a wing on Laguna Seca
Sad

>For instance, why are Americans incapable of building anything as advanced as the McLaren P1, or the LaFerrari, or the Porsche 918?

because for things like unobtainable dickwaving we prefer things like this instead.

*wins Le Mans too - just much more frequently*

Come back when you've set the Lunar GP lap record, yuropoor.
Until then, you're irrelevant.

*beats your time*

Imagine being actually autistic enough to type this out.

That was only the case in the 60s and 70s and it was because of pushrod engines that don't like to rev and primitive carburators that lose fuel compression at higher RPM.

Gotta find something to do while waiting for Mohammed to finish with your wife.

is this copypasta?

It was actually moreso the case in the 80s. Choked heads, exhausts, and intakes meant that past a certain RPM, power died off.

I will use this as pasta, thank you

>Eurocars having better reliability than Ameritard cars

>changing the subject
>can't face their obvious inferiority at automotive engineering
Lol.

shame it looks like it has downs

Better prep Tyrone to fuck your wife, right guys?

It looks like a combination of a Mustang and an XKR-S, it's beautiful. Ford has truly outdone themselves once again.

I kind of like it. A base model is within my price range for a new car, and is more or less competing with a gt86 and a camaro in my book. Is it worth it?

>doesn't have a space car
>calls those who do have space cars inferior in car technology

your jelly is showing

you'll regret getting the ecoboost

...

>makes inferior cars
>distracts to another subject because he can't bare the HUMILIATION of producing inferior cars

An Ecoboost Mustang starts at 27k, and with a Performance Pack and Ford Racing tune (does not effect factory warranty) you get track-ready car with big Brembo brakes and 335hp/390trq. Not too bad.

>n-n-n-no u!

reminder: the 4cyliner mustang ONLY exists so ford can move units in gasoline starved European countries.

Why is the 2018 facelift so bad? It looks like a depressed emo teenager.

And yet, most Mustangs sold in the Eurabian Caliphate are veeates.

bullied by camaro

but turbos are cooler than V8s and both run 11s with bolt ons and tune

>turbos are cooler than V8s
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

turbo spooling (esp through an open intake) and the feel of boost makes it so

...

The look of these reminds me of the new edge I love it

as it should
doesn't change the fact that ford literally made the 4cly turdo stangs for the european market
...for one pass

and now that I think about it literally every Mustang facelift since day 1 made the car uglier

its a Ford not a chevy

Looks like their plan backfired then, since the 4cyl Mustang shifts way more units in America.
Ironically, yurocucks seem to care more about having a V8 in your Mustang than Americans.

exactly lol
the men at least
only women and queers drive the 4cyl

Yuro women drive these, queers don't buy Mustangs.

>queers don't buy Mustangs
but Mustangs were the best selling sports car in Germany during the first month they were officially on sale there

a highly strung turbo i4 will always be less reliable than a unstressed NA V8

I was speaking about americans

I'm seeing more of those things around here in the US as well, often in bubble gum colors. It seems to be well-to-do progressive women from about 30s into retirement.

delusional

yuroqueers BTFO

in what world is a 2.3 turbo making 300hp high strung

the goddamn old Limas could do that all day long

its a ford

exactly its not a Chevy that shits itself after 6 miles

the v8 makes well over 400hp without a turbo... lol

buy the best car you can afford and then mod it

buying an i4 just to mod is a great way to set yourself up for disappointment when you realize you'll never get anywhere close to a v8

a bolt on ecoboost mustang makes less than a 5.0 stock

What's even the point of buying a mustang instead of something else if you're not buying it because it has a V8?

there is no point

the ecoboost exists for poorfags who can't afford the real deal

About to order a new car. Should I get a 2018 SS or 2018 GT?

>Created by Napoleon's ancestors
...wut

You can't get a 2018 SS, sadly. Holden isn't making cars anymore.

>ferd
Well there’s your problem

Camaro

>GM trash
>ever

>mustang
>muscle car

Why do you think the car has IRS if it's a muscle car?

God the Valkyrie was pure sex

power to weight ratio says your V8 is fucked buddy

get a turbo kit and make over 500 hp for less than the cost of a GT anyway

its not 1969 we got technology now

ford products are stinky shit cars

1LE.
Always 1LE.

>BTFO
I still don't know what this means, but every time I read it, I feel like I'm becoming dumber.

blown the fuck out

500 hp 2.3 l turbo will definitely be unreliable

Want a 1LE, but I have knee issues from my time in the military so I'd be getting an auto.

bruh people have pushed stock internals over 600hp and 500whp is maybe getting close to where you would want

500hp aint shit

or for the same money put a supercharger on a 5.0 and get more power

except a 5.0 is 10 grand more than the Ecoboost

and has a warranty

your 500 hp ebay turbo kit tuned by pacos garage has no warranty

why would you buy an ebay turbo with 10 grand

you can get a full high quality turbo kit with a warranty for like half that

hell you can keep it low boost and still be making more hp than a Mustang GT for less money

Last good looking Mustang was made in 1973

>460HP @ 7500RPM

That's unpatriotic.

71-73 were the ugliest Mustangs

Still slower than a civic

2nd ugliest*

All that tech and it's still just a

RUSTANG
U
S
T
A
N
G

Buy it if you want. But it will never gain the appreciation of even a lowly Chevy Nova.

I forgot to post the interior. The center console and knee pads are stitched now.

Ans it's still a piece of shit

>American muscle
>loses to a fucking Civic

Brainlets BTFO

IT'S FRENCH

>street legal

Pic related got launched the same year that got retired.

too bad that civic is literally undrivable since it has auto rev match

Well the first two versions of the Foxbody were quite ugly desu

good that you didn't say the Mustang II, because it is one of the best looking ones

I like that waffle griddle in the front.