Steam powered cars are the future, prove me wrong.
>no transmission required
>almost silent, no muffler
>more than powerful enough for normal uses
>very low emissions, can use variety of liquid fuels with little modification
>cheap, simple, and reliable
>warm up time is the only downside, but with remote car starters warming up for 30 seconds is a non issue
Steam powered cars are the future, prove me wrong
>driving a bomb
Hippie libtards are too busy throwing their money at the electric Jew, it'll never happen even if it were better.
Christ power, baby
>can use variety of liquid fuels
this may be really useful, because then you can use liquids that will have different properties at boil
i really like steam cars conceptually, i feel like getting someone to buy one in 2017 would be fucking difficult
people are only just starting to like electric
The amount of water the vehicle would need to hold for any reasonable trip distance would be really heavy, thus requiring a more powerful steam engine that uses more water, which makes it heavier so a more powerful engine is necessary. Eventually you have a steam locomotive.
Wrong. Condensers allowed steam cars in the early 20th century to go up to 1500 miles between water changes, with only a reasonably sized tank. Modern condensers would be far superior, allowing for way smaller tanks, and longer distances between changes (it'd be like getting an oil change, but simpler and cheaper).
It’s true user, condensers do quite a bit in regards of recycling steam.
>steam
>not just using a stirling engine
retard
>using a stirling engine instead of pure wind