Why are Russians vehicles are the most practical?

Why are Russians vehicles are the most practical?

Because Russia is an impractical place.

They aren't. They may be rugged, off-road capable, easy to fix, but practicality was never the first priority. For fuck's sake, the Soviet Union didn't even make any car types other than sedans for private ownership until the 70s.

You're confusing practical with utilitarian.

They're not.

That's literally what practical means. Only a decadent fat American would assume the opposite as the definition of practical - expensive excess that may potentially come in handy one day.

You are confusing tactical with practical again.

You`re confusing communism with practical again.

they are not, they are literal garbage.
If russian cars were any good they'd be competition. But they produce cars to compete with shitboxes released 20 years ago.

Necessity is the mother of invention

your confusing mother Russia with mother of invention

you see user, when you drink vodka like me you want easy drive car

I don't know why american and west euro retards idolize russian cars and think they do everyting well, cheap.

They do nothing well other than being easy to fix.

It's like AK, people think it's the ultimate reliable gun that never jams.
No it jams just as easily as everything else, it's just harder to break. That's it.

Why do so many Russians drive this?

Luxury with about as good reliability as domestic cars. If you want offroad capability your choices are either surplus 4x4 like uaz which is worse than 70's Defender in comfort or new Lada built to standards of the 80's if you want Russian... with money you don't have to endure Russian cars

>poo in loo car
>good reliability

10/10 reading comprehension there m8

Or do you really think Russian cars are reliable? Simple and easy to repair but not reliable.

>What is Zaporozets
A shitty imitation of a Italian poorfag car, I agree.
But not a sedan.
You are right that the majority of cars produced were sedans or estates

Except a car which utilitarian is only what is efficient for the majority of people. If the majority of people required pink lambos it would be utilitarian everyone else in the minority would also only have access to pink lambos. Are pink lambos practical? No. But they are utilitarian in this instance. Fucking commie

>t. Decadent fat American

because communist russians were poor and weren't given free choice in a free market. The state tells a company to make a vehicle for a purpose, and the vehicle serves that purpose only. To keep costs down, never change the vehicle, throw design out the window in favor of low manufacturing cost, and make it so hideously underpowered that it's impossible to blow up.

You prevent importation, and you prevent the free will of the people to get something "better", and that's what you get.

It's why americans don't make real trucks. Americans don't want real trucks, they want fashion statements that get 20mpg.

God bless free markets!

>What is Zaporozets
A sedan with two doors missing due to poverty. Also, it's barely a car, you might as well bring up SMZ S3A, the glorious grand touring convertible and Pepe in car form.

>the majority of cars produced were sedans or estates
No estate cars were available to the general public before Lada 2102 came out in the mid-70s. This was intentional; estate cars were seen as work vehicles, and private business was illegal.

Big, conspicuous, expensive, doesn't get stuck in potholes as easily as luxobarges do. Those who value at least some practicality prefer LC200s though.

Also, a shit ton of idiots buy cheap used RRs to look cool and then get raped by repair costs and tax.

Uaz Patriot is pretty good though. And who the fuck would consider off-roading on a Range Rover anyway?

Russia is a big country.