I'm stuck between buying a '13 Mustang GT or Camaro SS. Convince me one way or the other.
The Mustang is a bit cheaper and I like that the aftermarket is somewhat centralized, compared to the Camaro aftermarket being all over the place. But every fuckboy and their vaping club has a Mustang. And I can actually cam the Camaro instead of a ricey ghost cam tune. WHAT DO I DO
Other urls found in this thread:
caranddriver.com
twitter.com
Camaro is an unreliable piece of GM shit with a terrible interior and sub-par styling.
There literally is no choice but to get the Mustang. If you actually end up with the Camaro you deserve to get AIDS.
Spend your dad's money on whatever is faster
neither. save until you can get a 15-17 gt.
I don't want a 15+ GT. They're too small and sleek and look like something my mom would drive to her book club, describing as "cute yet sporty". 13/14 is where it's at.
>Actually cam the camaro instead of ricey ghost cam tune
So what you're saying is that if you got the Camaro you'd do what 90% of LS owners do which is swap in a huge cam just so it'll lope, never get it tuned and then bitch about how the driveability is absolutely ruined. Am I getting this right?
Meanwhile coyote guys get a lope tune (with all of the other modifications factored in because nobody does this to a stock car) and get power gains, along with a choppy lope and good driveability
challenger scat pack with 6.4l
smoke them both
yw
>more sleek
>bad
kys. the older one looks pigfat and massive.
Nah, if I got a cam I'd also get headers and intake and get it tuned. I actually live really close to a shop that tunes Chevy SS's all day long, including the fastest one in the country. They know their shit about the LS3.
Trust me, I 150% would. But insurance + the note would be a no-go.
>smaller, more cramped is better
Why do Eurofags try so hard to justify their shit market for non-exotics?
You can cam a Mustang too. It just costs a tad bit more. My '14 GT500 is pounding away with a moderate set of cams. It's amazing how held-back that Trinity 5.8 engine was from the factory. A full exhaust (LTs, midpipe, mufflers) and an NSR cam and mine picked up well over 100rwhp.
The coyote 5.0s are very responsive to modifications too. My wife has a 5.0 and it's a beast compared to the mod motors.
I vote get a mustang, make it non fuckvapeboyish.
Do it up right and sleepy.
I’d skip the pre-15 mustangs since they still have that archaic live rear axle suspension. A Challenger SRT8 2011+ or a 5th gen Camaro SS would be a better choice since they handle better while having a significant power advantage over the 5.0 mustang.
Had a challenger SRT for a few years and really enjoyed it. If you’re not hitting the track, check the challenger out since it’s got a ton of power, good aftermarket, and comfy. If you plan on mountain or track driving, go camaro.
it's an inch shorter in length, an inch wider, and an inch less tall. that barely makes a difference.
lmao, just be honest and say you can't afford one
i compared getting 12 gt or 12 camaro and ended up getting the mustang, neither are bad choices, the camaro has more easy potential, fbo with cam your looking at 460~ whp while on the mustang most people will agree for the price of cams boost is more worth it and mine made 420~ i personally perferd the interior and exterior of the mustang and engine is personal prefrence, i personally like shifting my car up higher in rpms (7600) and the more exotic sound of the dohc but the ls3 makes so much low end grunt and sound so agressive and deep... both are good it all comes down to personal preference.
I've sat in both and interior of the 15+ feels significantly more cramped. I'm 6ft @ 230lbs, so more room is more better.
>$1-2k more
>can't afford
You've truly outsmarted me with your detective skill.
>implying you aren't eyeing some beat to shit MY13 that's listed for $18k
man every meet i go to ive never seen any challengers with mods that arent rgb halo headlights.. they are fast in the stock for stock world but once bolt ons come along the get outpaced
>2007+10
>making statements
>assuming
Anything under $26k is in my "I can comfortably afford the note on this" range. That covers almost a whole a page of 13+ GTs with
True. Niggers buy them because they look like their uncles donk, then only put money into aesthetics.
>archaic live axle
caranddriver.com
2011 mustang gt runs 3:08.6
2010 camaro ss runs 3:09.5
2012 challenger scat pack SRT8 3:09.4
A SRT8!!! the track package was slower around the track than the mustang..
then even if that wasnt enough
the boss302 leguna seca is live axle and is a handling monster.
That's 100% wrong and you drive a $1000 shitbox so just leave the thread and let the adults talk
OP, camaro all day go test drive them and you'll understand. Better materials, interior, efficiency and performance
>carmax
I never said the the challenger was faster/better on a track than the mustang GT. What I said was that the challenger is the best car if all OP does is go to meets, use it as a daily driver, and do stoplight pulls. The camaro is a better car if he wants a track car since it’s got a better platform to work with and modify down the road with a fully independent suspension.
A better comparison between the mustang and camaro would be the 1le, which is significantly faster than both the GT and boss 302
>I want to buy two shitty American pigfat piles of shit
>Convince me which shit I should shove down my dickhole
>t. poorfag underpowered nipbox specialist
no weeb is buying eg hatches when youve got over 20 grand to waste user
Op clearly already made his decision
What can you buy for $20k that can match a 2011 mustang GT or 2011 camaro SS around a track? You can get those cars for that price without 100k+ miles and being beat to shit
a ls430 with 17k worth of mods :^)
Mustang GT rented one since my car is smashed feels almost of I were a real boy.
Kek