/simg/ Simulation Games General

Trump tweet from 2014

>aviation enthusiasts
>not even MILITARY aviation enthusiasts
Trump saw through the lies of ED and saw DCS for what it really is: Digital Civilian Simulator

Shocking!

Tfw natoboos in comments still defend ED

FAKE ACCOUNTS! RUSSIAN CYBER WARFARE!

SAD!

Dead af

tfw people want it
Imagine $60 c-130

>I know it's digital combat simulator but what if it was digital logistics mong simulator

But what's the point for it, if DCS can't into dynamic
Oh wait, because it's study and airquake sim

dcs is a great game

Ace Combat is great game too
none are simulators

DCS should be renamed to DSS (digital startup simulator)
Flaming Cliffs 3 should be renamed to Baby Cliffs 3 (meant for children age 3 and above)

>C-130
>instead of a C-17 or C-5

>or below*
FTFY

Would you please think of the manchildren!?

Guys help, I showed kuzia beach, and he cannot leave the water anymore, I want to take him home

But I and they fit under that category user

10

Иди нaхyй /simg/, I can't bump it forever

New plane revealed

>Иди нaхyй
What kind of bydlo are you?

Russian LARPer

will civilian flight sims be welcome if they bump the thread?
what about train/truck simulators?

>>Example of welcome games
>>Flight Sims
>Falcon BMS, DCS: World, Rise of Flight, IL-2, Combat Helo, Microsoft Flight Simulator, X-Plane, Enemy Engaged: Comanche vs Hokum
>>Driving Games
>Assetto Corsa, rFactor 2, Live for Speed, Euro Truck Sim, Train Simulator, Farming Simulator 201X, DiRT Rally, OMSI 2
>>Ground Sims
>SAM Simulator, Steel Beasts Pro, Steel Armor: Blaze of War, Graviteam Tactics
>>Submarine Sims
>Silent Hunter, Ship Simulator, Cold Waters, Dangerous Waters
>>Misc Sims
>Command: X

100% accepted in any case.
It's not like DCS is any different
>Digital Civilian Simulator

I'm very into X-plane 11 at the moment.
Just clicked with me somehow. Limited ATC and not much computer generated action but otherwise excellent. Feel of flight is there and the ability to make your own ortho scenery is massive.

I dunno, they put out regular patches that improve performance and everything is very cool. Maybe its lack of ED-tier fuckery that leaves you without much to talk about.

Honestly if blue flag was dependent on resupplying bases, having C-130 players would be really cool and would create a lot more work for fighters and make AWACS early warning a lot more important.

This.
+
I just wish that ED would put SFM player-controlled non-combat role planes(Awacs, Transport(Like BMS does with Awacs)).
It wouldn't have any armaments, so it shouldn't make anyone's life harder because it's SFM, and mission creators could create more interesting scenarios.
But what if..

Hmmm

youtu.be/_c6ebB7cUF4

...

Yeah an AWACS with a small crew like an E-2 or Saab 340 would probably be pretty on a server with enough people

*pretty fun

How does one get a vision like this for debugging reasons?

Is it developer SDK thing? I want to do few tests about radio waves

of course

I don't know there may be a way to enable debug mode through some lua, it's not on by default

forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3205917&postcount=10
How do those people breathe?

>tfw have to share oxygen with people like this

>Complain about FLIR
MESSAGE DELETED IN LESS THAN 1 MINUTE

POSTING RIGHTS REVOKED

WE DON'T TOLERATE criticism HATE SPEECH IN THIS FORUM

youtu.be/X3vbPEtSbv0?t=77
F-35 helmet cam video
Neat

posting rights revoked

What in the fuck is moose anyway

...

Mission editor still gonna be the same

:(

Wow that totally doesn't look like it will be a mess.

Nah, frameworks have neat file structure, otherwise would be no reason to use it
Frameworks are made to make life easier

Cant want to run at 10 fps

>all the same phototextures on the ground
Caucasus will never be good. Those textures looked terrible in the older engine, but now they are completely out of place. Why even bother with it at this point.

)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) BUY OUR SHIT ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

ED sucks huge hairy meat balls

will yet another weekend pass without the second hornet video?

Hard to make a video when it's far from finished

Just watched Pentagon Wars
You can relate whole movie to DCS situation

youtu.be/iDYpRhoZqBY?t=1969
>ED makes a module

Can anyone do quick rundown what does RCS do/mean?

Radar Cross Section
aka how big it is to the enemy radar

But how could F-15 look bigger than Su-27? Or is it faulty statistics here?

I mean, there's no source whatsoever for those numbers. Plus you have no idea what sort of conditions each data point was taken in.

It's a meaningless image unless there's a link to the paper where the numbers came from and methodology details.

Copy, thanks.

To give an example, the F-16 is actually a very stealthy aircraft when flown clean with no external stores whatsoever, but as soon as you add pylons, missiles, and bombs it's not significantly better than the F-15. The context of the raw numbers is crucial in all these silly military dick measuring contests.

Any must have ETS2 mods?

...

...

they could at least ask for one of the cool variants

>inb4 f-15 babbies cry that it's OP

Does anyone here play Aces High? There was talk on the forums about it finally moving to steam.

nigga why would you ever
just play any of the IL-2's instead

How's the multiplayer? Can you torpedo carriers?

The main server is full at peak times, but you have to wait for Battle of Midway for torps

Erich Hartmann never got shot down retard

What is the explanation behind this game having next to no mods

Being an iraqi

>the joke
>your life

...

>tfw walked around an A-20 today.
Should I paint BIG NIG on it?

...

having next to no players

...

...

Thanks for reminding me I want a multi-crew bomber sim

that team making the Tu-22 seems to know what they're doing, can you wait a few years?

>GAR-8

Well, I mean, there's always "The Mighty 8th" to tide me over, but that's pretty goddamned old

ded

Bumping with some Cote d'Azur

Nice to Genoa in a Beechcraft Model 18