Car has v8

...

>Car has a LS

wow that was such a cool meme XD

>car has v8
>its the 1uz

>car has an LS engine
>doesn't run

...

Lmao. F*rdfags on suicide watch

It's not even about the LS being better than X. It's literally just autistic engineering. It's like needing to get a lock off a door so you pick up a fucking boulder and smashing the thing like a caveman to get it off, or you can just understand how the lock works, pick the lock and not look like a retarded caveman while doing so. The LS engine is actually an autistic engine.

>someone who drag races
I have nothing left to prove

He drag races because he spins out going 5 mph when it comes to corners.

The LS is just the epitome of mediocrity.

t. owns a slowmobile

>gets twice as much fuel economy
Who the fuck buys a V8 for fuel economy?
>75% of the power with 50% of the displacement
Translation: less tuning potential, worse reliability (since the engine is more stressed), more weight and less torque. But at least you get to brag about muh power to displacement, which is a completely irrelevant measure in real life.

Why do cunts on Veeky Forums even consider low displacement as some kind of positive? Why don't you use the actual engine size and weight?

Why do so many people defend shitty engines?

There is no debate the LS sounds like a truck engine and doesnt like revs

t. DOHC V8 mustard rice

t. No argument

>engine bay has an LS
>is however surrounded by a GM car

Nice defense. Almost as good as giant engines that make shit power.

What's wrong with the HEMI?
T.clueless non V8 owner of ancient pushrod inline 4

Hemis are fucking pigfat

Why do hemis exist?
A dohc is the same size and better in every conceivable way?

Because the hemi head was hot shit back in 1901 and over 50 years later Chrysler decided to trademark the name at market it.

Ls is pretty small tho

Not displacement wise, they make some sad power.

this. 7l for what 500hp? nissan is doing that with two less cylinders and half the displacement. It's just lazy engineering on GM's part.

meanwhile Ford is doing 700hp with 3.5l and less weight

And two turbochargers. The naturally aspirated 3.5L and 4.0L cousins of the GTR engine make 250 to 275 hp, which is actually right in line with the LS for power per liter.

>hur dur, muh twin tarbo is faster than a na
retard

which ford is that?

With really bad fuel economy, high price and no bottom end torque.

This angers the furry.

iron block

>the detuned engine has less hp
WOW
>gm's engineers are so retarded they can't build a reliable engine. Their fanbase then tries justifying pushrods and NA

>not a ferrari v8

only acceptable v8s

>Is a V8 powered GM product
>not an LS

You know what I'm talking about.

>car has LS
>overheats

...

>Ls Thread
>S/o/viet & friends meltdown

Displacement is irrelevant. Tell me, what is the downsize to more displacement?

>It's irrelevant because it proves how shitty the engine is.
Every time.

a dohc v8 of the same displacement of a ohv v8 will be better in nearly every measurable aspect except size

Tell me the negative of high displacement.

So why not compare it to a ohv of the same size?

because you can just design the engine bay to be bigger. they aren't all that much heavier.

I hope you're memeing me, m80. If you're making the engine bay larger, you can also increase the size of you're ohv v8

Didn't say it was a negative. It's pathetic when a 7.0L makes the same hp as a 4.3L or 3.5L.

end urself furfaggot

mustangandfords.com/how-to/engine/1407-how-to-push-a-junkyard-351-windsor-past-1000-hp/

>7's
slow, try 5's

>you're ohv v8
there's a certain point where having more displacement is diminishing returns. there's a reason why there aren't 6L petrol i4s or 16L petrol v8s in mass production

I have just started posting

You may as well be comparing another irrelevant number like the amount of cams or valves
>hahaha. My ls3 make double your power per cam
>hahahaha my 16 valve v8 shits on your 24 valve inline 4 in power per valve.

>engine makes pathetic power
>IT DOESN'T COUNT

lol

OK. When v8s start reaching 14l displacement, we'll talk about ohc.
Nice shitposting. My shitbox v8 makes insane power per ignition pack

>It's shitposting because it proves how shit it is

Lol

Quoting mr RCR, "in a long enough time line, everything gets an LS"

yeah as if ohv isn't dying out because of how shit it is. i think the only motorsport it's used in is drag (lol) and turnleft. so nothing important

>a car is powered by anything other than an LS

This but unironically

But it's magically ok when a 200kg engine makes the same hp as a 100kg engine as long as the 200kg one displaces less air per revolution?

>gm lt4: 650hp, 559lbs
>Ford 3.5l EcoBoost: 700+hp, 449lbs
sperg more

sooo
50hp more

and 110lbs/ft less torque

>torque
>relevant

>implying

thats why all race cars use big fuckoff diesel engines, right?

>being an ass
Why don't everyone use super high boosted 2 litre engines then?

>Cherry picking
I'm just talking about the hp/L thing and how it's irrelevant. Citing two engines doesn't change that