I would unironically rather a Hino 300 crewcab to a Ford f250 super duty
>Can tow more
>Cheaper
>Doesn't make you look like a tool
>Much easier to maneuver due to engine layout
>Has a more capable diesel engine yet more economical for towing
>Toyota reliabilty
>Is designed purely for work no question about it
>Has all you really need in a vehicle and won't cost an arm and a leg in the long run
Other urls found in this thread:
>looks like shit
>can't do a burnout
>women hate it
lol kys soyboiy
Except you haven't ever been in a F250 Super Duty if you say that. Its far more comfortable than what amounts to a box truck. Ford isn't stupid. Its more of a luxury truck that can haul shit if you need it to.
A Hino Box Truck is 90% work/10% comfort, a F250 Super Duty is 50% work 50% comfort
Depends on what it is for.
If it is for work specifically the HINO wins hands down.
The F-250 is if you spend more time not working than you do working.
If you think women give a shit what you drive, you're a soyboy
Interior still looks like fucking shit and is still made from the same hard plastic as the fleet special, anyone buying into the luxury truck meme is fucking delusional.
Also if I have work to do you bet your fucking ass I'm going to use the vehicle that's 90% work.
We have those Hino's and Canters here in NA and they're still like $70k. Which buys you a nice normal pickup which can do everything the Hino can. 160hp diesels don't really work on modern roads here. You sure as shit aren't pulling 15k travel trailer with that. You also can't go out to a nice restaurant with the wife in that fucking thing.
Well, the Hino's interior isn't that bad, plus it's kinda cozy.
Cab-over ride quality is shit. You're right over the front axle so all forces are transferred to you vertically instead of with a rotational vector like in a standard cab-middle layout. That alone makes trucks like the Hino unpalatable for long drives but there's also the generally spartan interior which many would find suboptimal compared to a consumer market HD pickup. The other problem is fuel economy. Yes, they'te both thirsty beasts but that Hino is going to chug diesel like a frat boy chugs Busch Light at any speed above 60.
If you're really going to use it like a work truck should be used, then there is an argument for the Hino or some such equivalent. However, if you're going to use it for a mix of day to day driving then it is far from comparable. Everyone seems to forget how civilised pickups of all types have become. The way they ride, turn, stop, and cruise is comparable to a modern sedan within the bounds of nornal driving speeds. Work trucks aren't like that at all. They beat you up with a harsh ride, wander and struggle at speeds above 60-65mph, and wallow in even the slowest maneuvers.
>implying I would ever buy a 4x2 truck