>Ford 3.5L EcoBoost
>400 lbs
>over 700 HP
>Chevy LT4
>529 lbs
>a measly 600 HP
Turbo V6's are clearly better than V8's for track performance. Why would you want extra weight if you're trying to create a lightweight track vehicle?
>Ford 3.5L EcoBoost
>400 lbs
>over 700 HP
>Chevy LT4
>529 lbs
>a measly 600 HP
Turbo V6's are clearly better than V8's for track performance. Why would you want extra weight if you're trying to create a lightweight track vehicle?
>over 700 hp
>cant beat a tatra
turbo h6s are clearly better than turbo v6s for track performance,how did ford fuck up this hard?
is the pooinloo president responsible for this?
>Saleen S7R
>V8
>Faster than Ford Nu-male """GT"""
So much for that track performance.
>300k
>still won't put real exhaust tips on it
>The engine that is found in a purpose built track car that costs $500,000.
>Owners can probably afford the frequent engine inspections and rebuilds.
>An engine that is found in a road-car that is done up for the track.
>People who buy them need those engines to last a long time because they cannot afford rebuilds as often as the guy who bought the gt.
Find a better comparison.
Pic not related.
Great, now turbo the V8
Dat low center of gravity flat 6 engine.
that is true
...
wtf? A 3/4 ton should not have a v6 gasoline engine in it.
>What is torque
Good thread, bumping
torque is irrelevant
bump
>t.retard
I forgot that formula 1 cars use marine and locomotive diesels that make tons of torque
oh wait..
...
keep sperging
see try making a proper argument at any moment cuckhold
S/o/viet being non-argumentative as per usual.
nice spergout
Sexy