What are your car's 0-60 times?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mBFjHjm0O5M
youtube.com/watch?v=dvTVk0doJJM
caranddriver.com/reviews/1994-mercedes-benz-c280-archived-instrumented-test
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

69 seconds to bang ur mom

it cant hit 60

0-60

5.9 seconds


ND miata

Feels like its more because car is lightweight

5.5? something like that

no. retard

ok thanks

it's more around 5.7-6 seconds

19seconds

200D lmao

0.60 in 3.9 seconds

You're doing it HORRIBLY wrong then.

youtube.com/watch?v=mBFjHjm0O5M

4.6 seconds

premature ejaculator

Idk, high sixes I think? '90 325i E30
If someone knows the exact figure please lemme know

That’s bretty good user, faster than my wrx

youtube.com/watch?v=dvTVk0doJJM

5.7 Seconds, probably in the mid sixes now.

Like, being professionally driven? I’ve seen anywhere between 5.8 to 6.2

I usually take like ten seconds because I’m slo boi

I'm finding varying numbers between 10.5 and 12.5 seconds. It's probably 12.5 seconds. The quarter mile time has never been measured.

4.8 seconds I think.

About 9 seconds.
My 250 does it in 5.5, 1000 in 3 flat.
Corners faster than all my bikes though, so it's not all lost.

4.4, never hit it tho

1994 Mercedes C280, 0-60 7.7 seconds

Which one? 0-60 times vary wildly for the WRX. Official figures are over 5 seconds, but people have been able to do 4.7s pretty consistently... but that basically requires an anus-tightening hard launch.

Don't those fuck up the AWD system though?

yes, hard launch on asphalt is for people who can afford to break things. on snow and gravel its fun tho

That's about what I was picturing, AWD Subies typically being built around rallying, not dragging

best i can do is about 5.5 seconds in my 540i
about 6.5 secs in my m52 swapped e30

Professionals say 4.5 but I've never launched it so who knows

Modified STi, 620 HP, 2.8 sec 0-60.

t. mannlett

Not sure, desu. As popular as the BA XR6T is, I can't find a damned 0-60/0-100 number anywhere. I've had someone tell me it's around 6 seconds, and found an old forum saying they run the 1/4 in high 12s, but not sure on either of those numbers. That, and I'm sure those numbers won't hold up after 14 years. lol

I can hear your ringlands exploding from here

I was willing to drive it about 90 but now only 45 because of tires

Apparently 16 seconds.
Realistically about 20 or so
You don't really want to go much faster anyway

Around 12 Tested, internet says 12.3, I guess it's accurate.

Just under 5

0-60 in 8.slow

That curve is hot, what am I looking at?

0 to 60 in 14 seconds

09 G37

Not stock though

It shows, modern v6s cant hold the torque that high in the revs with all the emissions gunk

About 6.5 to 60

Took all the emissions gunk out

No cats, Invidia Gemini with x pipe, pcv delete, and tuned out the downstream O2. Was hard to get rid of the rasp, but the Gemini cleaned it up well.

It feels really good. Very linear.

Salacious jokes are degenerate.

Yes

10.2 in wet conditions. Lots of spin in 1st gear. I think I could be able to do 9-9.5 in good conditions.

3.5 minutes

I think from factory it's about 6.5 seconds. After aome modifications, I think last time I actually checked I'm hitting 60 around 5.8-5.9 seconds.

they say 5.0 and ive done 4.6 but theres a lot i cant do on the streets.

What year? I've walked a few 5.0's pretty bad.

Around 4s

Kada nightdrive?

2012 what you drive?

oh g37 nvrmd.. i mean do you have a turbo?

this is just a graph of my top end but like most put down like 360-370 stock

13.4, typical diesel econobox

No, just full bolt ons and 93 tune. I think the G37 is geared better, I usually don't walk away until 80ish

No clue
Maybe like 10 seconds
I lost several stoplight races to a Dodge caravan last night

A hair under 6 seconds with bolt ons

Virgin cuck who offed himself in the face of adversity

impressive with a shitty golf

>Oregon

we need more oregon posters on this board

It's not surprising if you look at the specs of the car. It can easily do it. Traction is going to be the issue since it dumps 380 ft/lb of torque at a mere 2.5k rpm

We really do
Im normally the only Oregon poster in any given thread and if there is another one it some Portland cuck

Where are you from user?

My 8th gen Civic has an official 0-60 time of 8 seconds, but with over 5000 hours of drive time in that car in the last two years, I've become a master carsman with a variety of advanced skills learned on high speed touge runs, and my Civic now gets up to 60 in probably around 10 seconds because it's getting old, and I neglect maintenance.

no idea ive never raced a g but id be btfo if one pulled on me past 80 lol

4.6 seconds, i push it every time i'm at a red light. Launch control on this car is so much fun

So it's not a gti then?

88 ford escort wagon 1.4. internet says 13.2, butt dyno says it sounds about right.

probably just a good tune

Factory says 4.5 seconds, but with the modifications done to the car it might be a bit under that.

Another Oregon poster here. Born and raised in Oregon, currently staying in Southern California doing some work down here.

Corvallis reporting in.

I'm originally from the bay area but California is balls so my family moved here

6.5 stock but i got lighter wheels, better rubber, lightening all around and lighter flywheel.

Faster than almost all bimmers. And most cars around are bimmers.
Definetly faster than damn near all audis.
Plus its fun to see them panic about understeer in their ff cuckboxes when going gets twisty

God I want one, just with a K24A2 from an 06-08 TSX

Kai užsidėsiu normalius ratus ir žemintas spyruokles.

5 seconds

Should be under 30 seconds once I get it running again.

6.5 seconds but I suck at shifting manual and I dont really know how to launch a manual properly so probably 8-10 seconds

Cool reg mate

How much did that bad boy cost?

I was thinking of getting something like that

About 30 minutes.

Will let you know next month at no prep. Assuming i can hit 60 in a quarter mile.

Somebody put a blower on their truck and i joked that the limbo was faster.

$20 a run.

Got a bunch of bros bring stock grocery getters for a laugh

Stock 455 with 50,000 miles and the car is 5,800 fucking pounds if anyone is good at math and wants to guess

Holy keke wtf is that user

how to get power out of na????

Around 10 seconds
T. Beat up N.A Subaru

$2,500 turbo kit.

220hp with conservative boost in an 1,800 pound car.

Yaboi!

OVER 7 SECONDS

SO IT GETS A 1 OUT OF 10

>not even new

>The C280's performance ranks mid-pack among its competitors. It runs up a 0-to-60 time of 8.2 seconds and a governor-limited top speed of 131 mph.

caranddriver.com/reviews/1994-mercedes-benz-c280-archived-instrumented-test

Official time is 8.5
Most road tests are between 8.5 and 8.8.
That's with the autotragic brain in charge.
Now that I've had a chance to drive it and know where the flat spots in the power band are I could probably beat the factory official time with a dry road and the bump shifter.
I'll give it a try in a few weeks when the roads clear up.

i appreciated this post user

I like this post. Here is the (you) that you deserve

Hivemind wtf. Also nice trips

Probably like 20 seconds or some shit, never bothered timing/looking it up.
>200hp, 4000lbs, 2.73 gears

Never bothered to look it up, never cared to test it. I always get chopped by auto v6 commos at stoplights because I won’t hard launch and I don’t really floor first; it makes the first second change too violent

As soon as I hit boost in second they are gone tho. It’s just a bit too quick for traffic light races

Apr stage 2 golf r. Around 3.8 seconds.

Not sure. 93 mph in about 7.2 seconds in an 1/8

Probably around 8 sec idk

buses dont get up to 60.

Around 9 seconds. The 280ZX isn’t fast but it’s nowhere near what old magazines claimed at 11 seconds. That had to have been a California 2+2 car with T tops and AC blasting

Maybe a non turbo?

Not mine, just grabbed that off google.
Mine cost me about 15k after taxes.