Is it a good rule of thumb to buy the second less cheap motor on small cars, like the Jazz pic related?
>20 K with 1.5 i-VTEC
>17 K with 1.3 i-VTEC
I'm afraid of buying a dull car to drive, and this consideration, while I'm not well versed in automobiles, is on my mind for a long time now. That the cheapest motor would be boring.
>considering a fit
>worried about buying a dull car
Kys.
I don't know user, would a "powerfull" Jazz really be less fun to drive than a standard Civic?
The Jazz is much more modulable, making it perfect for the city/sports lifestyle. Or so I believe
Depends on the car, a lot of car magazines and websites usually compare the different engines. Just look which one they like best.
If you want a car that isn't dull to drive, don't get a Jazz
I have an 8th gen civic now and i test drove a 2nd and 3rd gen fit and they're a lot more fun to drive imo, more peppy and great handling.
>city/sports lifestyle.
marketing bullshit
A new econobox is going to be dull, deal with it or buy something used
this is epic bait.
r88/8m8
Okay, less dull to drive then. "Normal to drive but with the ability to go up a ramp" could be a better description. Or "not a veal, without being a racecar".
Thanks for sharing, man of good taste.
>marketing bullshit
Certainly true, but I have been looking for jobs in cities where I can go surfing for longer than I have been looking for a car. 1 week longer exactly. It's just a coincidence that Geneva's car show is now imo.
But besides memeing, no one really answers the main question on motorization (except the gentleman )... :(
The best rule of thumb would be getting something cool like an Evo.
There is no point in spending five digits on a sad economy car