This is your average autonomous vehicle user

now post the average Veeky Forums user

Attached: 1455159843701.jpg (400x458, 30K)

Attached: improudtobeavirgin.png (1481x2233, 3.67M)

REMINDER:
that dude is called a vehicle operator, he basically manages the car as its self driving
he was looking down to watch the debug output of the car's lidar systems, which the center screen is always displaying

He was watching porn

>he

How much does that job position pay? A blow job in back of the grocery store and a box to sleep in?

a twitter user posted this photo of the crash site showing how misleading the low light dash cam footage was
night visibility is fine, this isn't a dark secluded highway, by any means
this accident shouldn't have happened

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 10.15.54 AM.png (1056x1430, 2.28M)

El Ogro de las Americas

>a grossly overexposed and filtered image taken at a different time is a perfect example of the conditions at the time of the accident

LA ATROCIDAD

Attached: 1509865711181.png (560x590, 13K)

may I save this please?

I saw it on a glassdoor page that they make $24/hr. Pretty good.

it's as grossly over exposed as the dash cam footage is grossly underexposed
city lighting is pretty standardized

So what are the odds of UBER scapegoating this individual? Seems like they got the footage out there quick of what was going on inside of the car.

$24/hr to whack off in a robot car all day while it mows down bikefags for you? Where do I sign up?

Everyone Will Be a Vehicle Operator in 2035 and It Will Be Beautiful

glassdoor my man.

Attached: img.jpg (665x266, 40K)

t. i have no idea how cameras work and i'm a borderline retard

>I have no idea what a lumen is and that there are about 25000 of them on the cyclist at the time of the crash

>hurr durr
cameras, especially the pinhole variety in a dashcam, tend to require more light to "see" than a human, not less

A 10 mins haircut and 5 mins of makeup and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

Dont reply to him. Most Veeky Forumstists would rather dig themselves further in a hole than admit they're wrong.

Attached: neildegrassegoesto4chan.jpg (250x247, 8K)

it's fun though

[citation needed]

>tfw this tranny criminal has done something you will never be able to do
>you will never be able to commit an armed robbery of a Blockbuster Video

Attached: h2kfGPp.jpg (284x339, 17K)

a progressive company like UBER wouldn't dare make an example of a POC transgender victim of the white patriarchy.

would they?

>Most Veeky Forumstists would rather dig themselves further in a hole than admit they're wrong.

If any of us actually applied ourselves we would make excelent strip mine operations managers. Even compared with other boards the holes done get as deep or as big as they do here.

>would they?

While the assailant was transgender and slightly coloured and the victim was white. The victim was an actual homeless woman.

Now they have to decide. Who do they protec and who they attac?

Do they attack the female gender as a whole or do they attack the gay rights crowd?

the 'driver' was a woman

the driver is still responsible for the operation of the vehicle at this stage

just like cars which self park are still the responsibility of the operator

Attached: 1422317837275.png (448x388, 165K)

it didn't. The video stops right before it hits her. RIP Uber, hope this lady had a family

she looks like she's texting based off her facial expressions

Attached: 1512285823899.jpg (384x395, 19K)

feels bad man

The thing that bothers me most about this whole thing is that the 'vehicle operator' is some ugly af fatass trash person. Like it sucks being dead but it's even worse when you're killed by some ugo who hasn't walked more than 5m in their life. It's like a giant metaphor for life the fit and hard working person is crushed under the weight of some lazy shitstain.

It's also pretty fucked up they've totally darkened the footage as PR damage control.

is that a serious question?

i wish niggers would stop jaywalking across streets at night

the stereotype cannot be stoped

>women cant drive
>invent driveless cars so people can not-drive whilst driving
>woman crashes car and kills one
>cyclist
>the ride never ends

>"Driver" not paying attention and lurking the phone
>Cyclist crossing illegally at snails pace
Just take away the license and call it a day.

kek

>wtf how did police obtain the camera footage
If the police know you have crucial eyewitness video of a homicide, they WILL make you give it up.

Unlike Waymo/Google and GM/Cruise who have plenty of miles and no deaths, Uber's cars have killed people at roughly 25 times the rate of a typical human-driven car in the United States. So, no insurance company is going to insure automation that has 25X higher death rate.

The policed released video which shows that Uber's "safety driver" was looking down at her lap for nearly five seconds just before the crash. This suggests that Uber was not doing a good job of supervising its safety drivers to make sure they actually do their jobs. Quite possibly, many "supervised" Uber cars couldn't stop because their 'driver' was lulled into a bored stupor after sitting in the car for hours doing nothing.

Or the Uber video is a testament to not using a cellphone while driving. The driver paid too much attention to the cellphone in her lap than to the road with pedestrian in it.

But zooming out from the specifics of Herzberg's homicide crash, the key point is this: conventional car crashes killed 37,461 in the United States in 2016, which works out to 1.18 deaths per 100 million miles driven. Uber announced that it had driven 2 million miles by December 2017 and is probably up to around 3 million miles today. If you do the math, that means that Uber's cars have killed people at roughly 25 times the rate of a typical human-driven car in the United States. There's already documented cases of Uber running red lights too.

Attached: Nina.jpg (640x480, 22K)

>woman

Literally any smart phone will make a better video than that Uber camera system.

youtube.com/watch?v=1XOVxSCG8u0

Either that or the Uber video has intentionally been manipulated.

>This is your average autonomous vehicle user.
You forgot to show SUPER ANGRY AUTONOMOUS USER face resulting from the car's software not using roads, turns, or intersections that are blacklisted as being unsafe for autonomous software recognition. As a result, the routes that autodrive software picks may take longer and require a greater distance.

Police released video footage.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/03/video-uber-driver-looks-down-for-seconds-before-fatal-crash/

Uber's cars failed to recognize six traffic lights in the San Francisco area," the Times found, citing internal Uber documents.

arstechnica.com/cars/2018/03/video-suggests-huge-problems-with-ubers-driverless-car-program/1/

Shortly afterward, Uber left the state of California in the midst of rising tensions with California regulators. The company moved its testing operations to Arizona, which is known for having one of the country's most permissive testing regimes.

Uber has since returned to California roads, but a large share of its testing activities now take place in the Phoenix area. One consequence of that shift is that the public doesn't know very much about how the vehicles are performing.

Attached: WTF.png (1280x720, 994)

Attached: 1461183582584.png (315x233, 118K)

Attached: 1446788168182.jpg (1144x823, 407K)