Why are these so cheap???

why are these so cheap???

Attached: gto.jpg (750x500, 171K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ukVsqR66ldE
cargurus.com/Cars/inventorylisting/mySavedListings.action#listing=195558666
japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1992-toyota-mr2-turbo-gt/
japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1992-nissan-silvia-qs/
japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1991-silvia-qs-s13/
japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1990-nissan-skyline-gts-2/
trademe.co.nz/motors/used-cars/mitsubishi/auction-1576366746.htm?rsqid=3f9216bdc05e42158f201de0b7675db1
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Shit tier reliability, slow, and nobody knows what they are.

They're reliable. Just hard to work on.
Meme more.

but they look like a nsx so they should be pricey right?

>slow
faster than a GT-R

>it's not shit
>it's poo

Attached: 1520777962093.jpg (699x919, 214K)

The twin turbo model is not reliable.

The NA versions are, but they are slow and fwd

Want one so bad

There's on near me that I'd buy right now if I didn't need a new daily instead.
I wish I could drive one every day but I'd probably end up broke.

sounds worth it to me. I hear they're great fun to drive.

Junk coated junk with junk filling unless you have a budget that would put you in any number of better cars stock let alone builds.

simple answer?

They are undesirable since they are unreliable.

People here will spout lies like "they are faster than the GT-R" but that's just not true.

>something slow is faster than something extremely slow

Attached: 1520826997712.jpg (184x184, 15K)

>People here will spout lies like "they are faster than the GT-R" but that's just not true
youtube.com/watch?v=ukVsqR66ldE
stop being wrong.

Convince me not to.
cargurus.com/Cars/inventorylisting/mySavedListings.action#listing=195558666

Daily reminder that the R33 GT-R is faster and more desirable than the 3000GT.

3000GT is a great looking car. That's about it. Other than that, they are a pigfat, slow unreliable japanese sports car.

>$10k price tag
>parts are hard to find
>car is very difficult to work on.
>you probably can't afford the insurance

be honest man you have no interest in actually owning that.

Yeah you're right.
I wanted to see what people would say though.

foe $10k you can get much cooler cars from Japan and parts aren't hard to find. examples, but they are sold

japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1992-toyota-mr2-turbo-gt/

japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1992-nissan-silvia-qs/

japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1991-silvia-qs-s13/

japaneseclassics.com/vehicle/1990-nissan-skyline-gts-2/

why shouldnt i get this
and is the automatic more reliable than the manual
trademe.co.nz/motors/used-cars/mitsubishi/auction-1576366746.htm?rsqid=3f9216bdc05e42158f201de0b7675db1

you shouldnt get it because its a 20 year old japanese sports car that is known for being unreliable, expensive, difficult to work on.

but if you still want the car after I mentioned all that then go ahead. Please get it so you can learn the hard way.

Is Japanese Classics a renown website for buying good condition vehicles?

Driveway status ornament.

yes. source: My friend got his 180sx from there.

They aren't the only people in America that import and sell Japanese cars though. Do some research on your own. Plenty of other companies that do this.

>Automatic, front wheel drive, NA 3000GT
>Sportscar
pick 1

you got me there. its just a 20 year old japanese economy car that looks sport.

no they're not. They polish cars they purchased for a small fraction, then sell for an insane profit.

same reason the 300zx is. difficult to work on, aftermarket support and the community is shit.

other caliber cars from that era are worth double or triple. supra, cause ricer tax and they do look a bit more modern. rx7 cause tiny and nimble and doritos. nsx cause hondafags and exotic flavor.

mitsus are not shit or unreliable. if you know what youre doing with them, you're gold. if you dont know them very well, and start blindly modding, you're in trouble. big trouble.

source: turbomitsufag since the 90s.