What the hell happened?

youtube.com/watch?v=WWo-7uVR8yI

I was destroying the Mass before it was cool.
youtube.com/watch?v=5lvU-DislkI

I wouldn't be surprised if Benny Hinn never heard of Luther

meh, I find this version better

youtube.com/watch?v=a54iqEr1flQ

Pentecostalism isn't Lutheran.

youtube.com/watch?v=LhGH4HaylaU

It all derives from the same heresy - that there's no priesthood and no sacrifice of the mass. If there's no sacrifice, we can arrange our meeting whatever we want, singing psalms and reading Bible or rolling on the floor - it's all the same.
Same goes for the "catholic" church today.

Hi there!

You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of Veeky Forums are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!

Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!

>the same heresy - that there's no priesthood and no sacrifice of the mass.
You mean that famous teacher of heresy the New Testament?

Next time, try English.

Do hablo engles, paco?

There's no priesthood and just one sacrifice in the New Testament

What do you call a "New Testament"? 27 books from KJV?

Matthew to Revelation.

>You are Peter and on this rock I build my Church
>I grant you the keys of Heaven, what you bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven

Nice try heretic, go destroy Christianity elsewhere.

I don't see the word priest there, perhaps you meant to cite another passage?

The Apostles had the authority to create a priesthood and that's what they did.

Then Luther and Calvin without any authority destroy this structure for anarchy among Christians.

But hey at least this let German princes do the Christian act of sacking monasteries.

Because...?

First thing Luther and Crammer (and Bugnini) did was erasing the Psalm 42th from the Canons - because it had the word "altar" in it. Even worse - "the altar of God".

>The Apostles had the authority to create a priesthood
They did not have the authority to usurp Christ
>and that's what they did.
No, they didn't.
>Then Luther and Calvin without any authority destroy this structure for anarchy among Christians.
>But hey at least this let German princes do the Christian act of sacking monasteries.
I see you're going for the feels-based argumentation.

Perhaps you could justify the priesthood from scripture, rather than pulling it out of your ass?
Because it is God-breathed.

Bearing false witness is a sin, user.

What's wrong with this image?

>Perhaps you could justify the priesthood from scripture, rather than pulling it out of your ass?
I guess you ignored the whole Old Testament exactly because it contradicts every protestant believe ever created?
>Because it is God-breathed.
Nice dodge. But you know exactly what I asked. And you weren't able to answer.

Why does this piss people off? Shouldn't the Pope be Christlike?

>I guess you ignored the whole Old Testament
I'm sorry, are you a judaizer? I thought we were talking about the new covenant.
>Nice dodge. But you know exactly what I asked. And you weren't able to answer.
What? If you have something to say, say it.

Cuckoldry isn't Christlike

>politeness is cuckolding

Actually it is.

>turn the other cheek

>hi mr heathen
>let me suck your fett mmmm
>polite

>What? If you have something to say, say it.
Why those specific 27 books? Why not The Shepherd of Hermas? Why not Didache? They both were written around the same time (if not earlier) and clearly address Christian priesthood and churches offering a "pure sacrifice" during their feasts.

>I'm sorry, are you a judaizer? I thought we were talking about the new covenant.
You doubt that the Order is eternal and Jesus solemnly promised not a single dot of it will be changed?

>Why not The Shepherd of Hermas? Why not Didache?
Because they were not God-breathed.
>They both were written around the same time (if not earlier)
Those books are 2nd century, the NT is 1st century.

So yes? You are a judaizer?

>So yes? You are a judaizer?
Jesus says so, so I guess I am, basing directly on His own words.
>Those books are 2nd century, the NT is 1st century.
Actually, first full canons:

1. Codex Sinaiticus: 330-360 AC
2. Codex Vaticanus: 332-367 AC
3. Codex Alexandrinus: 1st half of the 5th century
4. Codex Ephraemi Syri rescriptus: 5th century

While The Shepherd: 140 - 210 AC, and Didache: around 150 AC.

Is that priest wearing a tallis? Huh?

What makes you think he's a heathen?

Jesus was quite literally born of cuckoldry

No biblical text was written by God

Those are manuscripts. The books are 1st century.
He's a muslim
The bible is Θεόπνευστη

Are these brothers the two faithful witnesses in Revelation?

>Those are manuscripts. The books are 1st century.
Based on what proof?

>"Toronto" in the background

Why the hell is wrong with you and your religions, Toronto? Really.

I listened pater.

Illiterate protestants.

So, the Catholic Church wanted to produce a new mass, that won't be referring the altars, the priesthood and the sacrifice, so the protties could join in. All we got was protties still sticking to their heresy and Catholic Church being destroyed by the modernism from within.

>This wasn't real Catholicism!

Do elaborate, please.