Are arabs a master race?

Are arabs a master race?

I ask this because arabs had huge ass empires and genius philosophers and generals, like Aberroes, Al-Kindi, and Khalid ibn Al Waleed. Could an inferior race accomplish what the arabs did at their prime?

Most inventions/discoveries during the Islamic golden age were by Perisans

Are white people a master race?

I ask this because white people had huge ass empires and genius philosophers and generals, like Plato, Alexander, and Gustav II Adolf. Could an inferior race accomplish what the white people did in their prime?

Lol they're not even the first among the Muslims.

There you have it.

Arabs never did much tvh.
Persians, Kurds, T*rks, etc; those were the brain of the Empire

Of course arabs are the master race. The evidence is incontrovertible.

Whites = Asians > all races > higher primates > African blacks > American blacks >>> Turks > Arabs

There's literally one valuable book in Arabic, and it had to be written by God to be any good.

>Ayyrabs
Since the days of the Abassids(or really the days of the Umayyads) they haven't been truly relevant.

In the Middle East, arabs are considered the dumbest, ugliest and loudest of them all. They're beat by Persians, Turks, Kurds and pretty much every other ethnicity in the area.

Go live in an arab country for a few years then you will see. They aren't.

>conquered supposedly superior Persians and Byzantine empire

You guys are trying to say that shitskin Persians and hairy Turks were better than Arabs?

Also ethnic arabs were very prominent in mathematics, philosophy, and science, especially physics and chemistry. This is indisputable fact held by many historians. It was not just Persian and Turkish scholars, they came later but do not discount that significant achievements made by Arab geniuses.

Are humans a master race?

I ask this because humans had huge ass empires and genius philosophers and generals, like myself. Could an inferior race accomplish what the humans did in their prime?

Well fuck.

I can't even use the "go back to /pol/" meme response to derail this thread since modern Arabs with their retarded behaviour would contradict me at this very moment.

Kudos to the arab bashing thread, OP.

That verse in the Quran is using a different form of the word Arab. It is using the root ar and connotes some other meaning that does not demean arabs.

Not saying they didn't have any scholars, but they went to shit down the line.

>Gustav II Adolf
Kek

Yes modern arabs sure have autism but in the past arabs were a perfect race, molded into perfection by the harshness of the Arabian desert. Modern Germans are also flawed, as they are chucks, but this does not mean that reman genetics are inferior.

If I remember right it meant something like desert dwellers or bedouins. Of course its not demeaning Arabs.

You should learn that arab and muslim isn't the same, none of the 3 you named were muslim

> in the past arabs were a perfect race,
Kek, before islam they eat dead bodies of their enemys, then they became autists whose believe in allah

well, shit.
none of them were arab*

They took the Persians after they'd been badly defeated by the Byzantines, kicked out a tired and unprepared emperor from the Middle East. They then started mixing with Persians.
T*rks did the most conquering, the various waves of them that arrived through the years.
Arabs didn't do that much

They were Arab. The post made no mention of their religions, despite them being Muslim, contrary to what u falsely believe.

>khalid
>not arab
what the actual fuck am I reading?

It seems that this threads posters are ignorant of the fact that it was arabs who conquered the Persian and most of the Byzantine empires. The Turks came at the end and took Constantinople, riding off the success of arabs.

Averroes wasn't an Arab though, he was Andalusian

>what are the Seljuks?
>what is the Sultanate of Rum?
>ignoring centuries of Turkish conquests in Anatolia and India

Arabs were stuck and the Turks came along and breathed new life.

U know what Andalusian is? He is arab from Al Andalus, hence an Arab

And you seem ignorant of the fact that if it weren't for the Seljuk Turks and Ghaznavid Mamlukes conquering Persia in the early 10th century then the Abbasids would have gone out of existance right then, cause of the "muh never conquered" Daylamite Buyids and Samanid empire retaking Persian land from the Arabs.

You owe us, habibi.

Andulisians aren't regular peninsular Arabs, they're mixed with other ethnicities like Berbers and Visigoths

Thank you, based House of Osman!

Turkish success merely built on the initial, much more impresssive successes of the arabs in both war and the sciences.

Turks are the greatest warriors of Islam.
Arabs did some stuff, but eventually Persians recovered their momentum and started pushing them around until the Turks arrived.
Persians are scientists and philosophers.

Avveroes was an Andalusian arab. The case can be made however than Ibn Khaldun was not completely Arab, but had significant Berber DNA. Visigoth, not so much

>turks
>brain

>Persians: High Elfs

>Turks: Orcs

>Arabs:Humans

?

T*rk sultans did pretty well, pretty good at strategy, just look at Timur

Talking Elder Scrolls?
Persians: High Elves
Turks: Orcs
Kurds: Dark Elves
Arabs: Redguards

>huge ass empires
You mean those huge ass empires of nothingness?

They did get a big chunk of land

Captcha: 2400 Granada

>Turks are the greatest warriors of Islam.
Look at the Arabic Chaliphat and at the Turkish Empire.

Timur was turkic mongolized guy, and he was not a sultan, he was emir, and he build his empire in Central Asia, he has no relation with Turkey

I know he wasn't a sultan, it was going with thought process turks=good for war.
When we talk about turks we talk about turkic nomads that came down and assimilated, not modern t*rks.

Only Persians compare to Arab in total achievements
>Turks
Only effective military wise and creating an Effective bureaucracy(even then thats only the Ottomans, The rest of the turkic Dynasties including the Seljuks and its many offshots disbanded badly) but not much in terms of everything else, if anything the region becoming worse because of their incompetence to the point that a Georgian Mamluk dynasty who ruled Iraq for a century and Muhammad Ali Pasha did more for Iraq Syria and Egypt than centuries of Ottoman rule

>Kurd
Biji Wiji detected
Literally the only important Kurd was Salah al Din and he was pretty arabised culturally wise

His army consist from turkic-mongol steppe horse archrers, persian infantry and engineers.He win because his army have cast-iron discipline like in army of Chengiz-Khan.
This is what i dislike in english language, when in russian you say TУPК, you mean modern t*rk, and when you say TЮPК you mean turkic nomad.

come one dwemer are persians
just look at their style, literally copied persians

Averroes was Andalusian you camelfucker.

They're copied Babylonians/Mesopotamians.

No

If Arabs are the master-race then how come they can't conquer Israel?

Jewish master-race confirmed again.

>Alexander
>White

>persians and t*rks are better
>literally enslaved and converted to the religion of the Arabs for relevancy and survival

Doesn't matter if they eventually usurped them, Arab culture touched them more than theirs touched the Arabs

Andalusians weren't Arab, they were Spanish and Berber.

You do realize "Arab" includes people besides Bedouins.

Andalusians were some uniform mix. There were Arabs, Berbers, Mozarabs and Spaniards

weren't*

Question not thread related but somehow relevant.
Why is it that the Middle East has only ever had its shit together when they were part of a larger empire? I get the whole "nation states are a European concept" meme but you go further east and you find many more "stable" nation states than you do in the Middle East. Like only Central/Southern Africa are comparable with how backwards they are.
You guys make Mexico look like the jewel of the Gulf Coast.

Probably because the middle-east is too diverse and disunited for nation states. With the exception of Turkey and Israel which as you may notice got that way by basically genociding anyone they didn't want in their nation state.

Fair enough. Would you prefer it to stay as is or do you think that a middle eastern empire/caliphate is the only way to solve that problem?

Isaac Newton single handily had a bigger influence on science than all of the history of Golden Age Arabic science

the funny thing is


this is true

I think given enough time in (relative) peace people would grow accustomed their their states and begin to view it as their nationality. So it doesn't need changing so much as it needs an era of continued peace.

The biggest obstacles to peace however being a number of the countries there that aren't particularly interested in peace.

>In the Middle East, arabs are considered the dumbest, ugliest and loudest of them all
>just in the middle east

Uh yeah. Generations of inbreeding is totally the master race material. The middle east is proof of their competence.

what was his science based on? ?
Maybe Arab science? ?

>Plato
>Alexander
>Wh*te

>Kurds

Redguards are berbers
Arabs are Khajit or wood elves

The Islamic movement was both good and bad. They spread rapidly fighting every one for Islamic rulership, but socially they were the opposite. They helped revived many religions and cultures. They revived places like Damascus and crated new cities like Baghdad during the Golden age. Countries assimilated under Islamic rulership that wasn't seen before. They conquered so easily because places were always in war with each other. Various cultures and religions got a long, despite the misconception that they forced people to convert or kill them. Muslims rebuilt societies and religions that were not their own.

I wouldn't call the empire master race, but it deserves more credit than they get. Without the Golden Age of Islam, most classical science philosophy we know of today would have been destroyed and lost by other empires. So next time you meet a shit skin, thank them for reviving all of the Greek knowledge that you're obsessed with.

Then of course time goes by and Islam turns to shit, mostly by western influence. Traditional fundamental Islam was pretty based for it's time though.

Didn't it all start in Sumer?

That general area has quite a few ancient references.

Nordicists pls go