Sexuality

>LGBT movement
I support gay people but I'm not a fan of big social movements. It doesn't matter if they are right or left wing.
>public nudity
>exhibitionism
No.

>Polyamory
Don't care.

>Unless you are lurking for interest and just wanted to bump.
partly this.

I was shitposting but my general position on all of them is that. I don't mind what people do with their time. If they want to fuck people of the same sex that's fine, if they want to go around naked that's fine, if they want to fuck many partners that's also fine.

>Homosexuality disrupts the social fabric.
no it doesn't

My dad gave me the talk in 4th grade

I think politics of representationalism and assimilationsim, in any form whatsoever (classic, multiculturalism, identity politics, etc.) are totally useless and do nothing except as a damage control by those in power. Nothing personal, though.

100% dont care

dont care about incest, bestiality, or anything else frowned upon by society either

as early as possible

>b-but we must preserve our children's innocence :((
>b-but theyre too young to understand that a man must insert his sexual organ into a woman's, ejaculate, and then a baby will be produced in ~9 months :((

stupidest fucking meme of all time

There is a negative correlation between sexual ""progressiveness"" and civilization. When one advances the other declines.

We need to go back to the time where monogamous relationships, virgin brides, sex for procreation, fear of God, and ostracizatiin of deviants was the norm.

Maybe the normies will finally open their eyes rights before they are put down (for men) or sexually enslaved (for women) by the betas during the uprising.

Literally what proof do you have?

This is because beta males are the engines of civilization. During times of sexual liberation, the betas lose out to the Chads because women are sluts.

I honestly believe homos should be sent to another planet where they can fag to their heart's content and that all humans must be straight or forced to be straight by messing with their brain chemistry.
>public nudity
Animal behavior unless at the beach or in your home
>Exhibitionism
Really depends
>Polyamory
Only if it is one man and multiple women, the women get no say.

why?

I'm still convinced being a homo is a social construct, that is achieved by the events that shape you as a person. No child is a homo, because children don't think about sex until they're older or unless they're forced to.

They become homo later because of how their life went. You might have more feminine hormones, but a male creatures responsibility is to have kids, right? So no matter how feminine you act you still have a natural impulse to impregnate women. And if its a point where feminine hormones trump male hormones, then you have a pussy.

Disregarding all that, Romans even had boy toys they fucked. But they kept it to themselves, because it was pretty weird. Its the same today, theres no good reason homos should have pride parades where they flaunt their cocks in front of children. Where are the Straight Pride Parades?

PS: Hormones might not be the correct word. Also idk if theres a 100% consensus on if homosex is genetic or constructed, but if there is a consensus then let me know

>How do you feel about the LGBT movement?
I like boypussy and girldick desu

>public nudity?Exhibitionism?
pretty hot desu

>Polyamory?
Pretty cool but I personally don't think I could make it work.

>Where are the Straight Pride Parades?
t. Soccer mom on Facebook

>Where are the Straight Pride Parades?
go and make one if you want, nobody's stopping you.

what a redd it argument

Look at least animal fuckers keep their shit under the dirt but faggots are always OOH LOOK AT ME IM SO GAY YAY, especially in your boy pussy threads on this board, its fucking disgusting thus needs to be removed from this planet.

Well thats my point.

Straight people see no reason to flaunt their sexualitys 'pride' because theres no point in it. Its fucking retarded, sexuality is something you should be keeping in the confines of your home, not out on the streets.

You missed the entire point of pride parades,
Its not to show off, its to show that you exist and want representation. It isn't a big orgy in the streets for no reason no matter how many clickbait news articles you post.

>Straight people see no reason to flaunt their sexuality
hahaahahahah

No, they don't feel the need to have pride parades demanding equal rights because they're already validated by society for showing interest in and marrying the opposite sex.

I've been to three pride parades in my life.

None of them gave me the feeling of 'demanding equality.' It was a show of promiscuity where gays could go dress like sluts and make out with 15 people while dunking jello shots.

Thats literally any parade doofus

When some Chad starts to brag about how much pussy he pounded at that sick party and how fat that ass was, do you politely tell him that you respect his sexuality but he should keep it in the confines of his home so he doesn't look like a perverted freak?

Because I guarantee you that sort of reaction is the best I expect if I tell people I want to dress like a trashy slut and take big fat cocks. No one has ever given me the thumbs up for scoring a cute guy.

I think a lot of people will think it will corrupt them and then the kid will start playing with itself prematurely

At this stage they're just traditional. Originally they were for rights. It was a reaction to having to stay hidden for years. People are less likely to acquiesce to gay bashing if it's their uncle or sister or whatever getting bashed. It was important that people start coming out, and pride was instrumental in that.

Now it's just a tradition, gay bashing doesn't happen quite as often (though all gays should carry, all the time.)

Is it even a bad thing if they do? They might be doing it already anyway. I remember having sexual thoughts and masturbating pretty early in life desu.
In general I get the impression people worry a lot about exposing children to sexual information they already know, which is pretty stupid. But then again that's a completely baseless assumption so it could be completely wrong.

Honestly I think most kids play with themselves very young. I can vaguely remember doing gross shit because it "felt funny" all the time when I was really young.

Does anyone know what Aristotles views on homosexuality were?
I am pretty sure that Plato?Socrates at the very least saw it as a good thing but I cant remember hearing what Aristotles thoughts on the subject were.

see
you should teach your children about sex when they become curious about sex, and seeing that arousal and stimulation are natural milestones from an early age then theres no point in keeping them in the dark

What the fuck is even your point?

That you dress up like an obnoxious fuck and tell everyone you're an annoying cock gobbling faggot? Good job. Like I said, stop being a retard flaunting something nobody gives a shit about or wants to hear about. Nobody except teenagers give eachother thumbs up for scoring cute girls, either

again, its to show you exist in the first place
Visibility it key here

Bump

Can we talk about this apparent room from the Russian Queen's palace? I remember reading about it.

Who discovered it? Who took the pictures? Where was it? Why isn't anyone searching for it today?

I like Russia's stance on basically every social issue. I don't give a fuck what you do. Just don't expect any laws preventing discrimination of it you faggots.

>How do you feel about the LGBT movement?
I don't know much about the movement itself, but I see nothing wrong with being homosexual, bisexual or transgender.

I sometimes wonder why transgender is lumped with those two though. I do find how feelings about gender identity intersect with sexuality very interesting though, and I think people who divorce the two immediately and without question are going about it wrong.

>public nudity
Literally nothing wrong with it. I'd appreciate it if nudists carry around a towel for when they sit on public spaces though, like the Germans like to do.

>Exhibitionism
Mixed feelings. On the one hand I don't really care if that's what you're into, but on the other hand I feel like people shouldn't have to put up with you wagging your sexuality in their face.

>Polyamory
Not for me, and I don't think it's a good idea if you want to build long-lasting, healthy relationships (which I think is what helps create psychologically healthy sex) but I'm not into the idea of policing sexuality.

filename

>How do you feel about the LGBT movement? public nudity?Exhibitionism? Polyamory? etc.
Utter degeneracy.

Luckily all this is going to come to an end now.

Why is it degenerate?
And why will it end?

>I don't give a fuck what you do. Just don't expect any laws preventing discrimination of it you faggots.
sounds like you give quite a few fucks

Personal sex lives and preferences are not something anyone should bring up in public be it voluntarily or because it's demanded of you. It's not anyone's business and it shouldn't define your character. Making your sexuality public property is fucking stupid and gives others power over you in ways that you most definitely will not agree with. I think history has proven that.

Things like swimming nude is not the same as flaunting your sexuality, though.

>It's not anyone's business and it shouldn't define your character.
Isn't it a very important part of your character though?

Is it? Why? Who told you to think that?

Plato/Socrates were in favor of platonic relationships. They considered that sex acts would dirty the relationship.

I'm not him.
How you deal with sex is part of your character. Just how you deal with money, etc.

Personal finance isn't quite as intimate as sexuality.

And?

>Lets talk about the morals and history of sexuality.

Sure!

>How do you feel about the LGBT movement?

It's alright. I feel like it's kinda being hijacked by gay men at the moment, who seem to dislike every other letter in there. Now that they can marry, they've basically been let up into the ivory tower and are now fighting their former partners. Kinda like American white women the instant they got the vote. It sucks. I also feel really bad for Trans folks.

>public nudity?

Meh. Should be mostly allowed, but I don't really care.

>Exhibitionism?

Shrugs intensify.

>Polyamory?

Poly folks oughta have marriage rights. The only problem with it is how the mormons and other shitty monotheists can go full oppression in isolated communities. That said, it's not like normal marriages in isolated communities tend to be any less abusive.

Changing up pronouns is like salting the wound. Not only are you confused about things, but you are just confusing the shit out of everyone else with your bizarre masking "solution."

Homosexuals and transgenders will never assimilate with or overcome society. They will be held down by their isolation. And because of that, they will always be decadent in some way.

That said, punishing anyone for this behavior or hating them for it is disgusting and unbecoming.

Public nudity is retarded and for perverts / weirdos. That ship fucking sailed, and there is no point in trying to resurrect it. The very fact they do it as a group shows that they are NOT beyond whatever moral constraints they claim wearing clothes has, because the movement is reactionary, not progressive.

The porn industry / PUA culture etc. is sad. It's sad to see so many addicts. And just like the public nudists, their addiction to an orgasm goes directly against what they claim to be -- above morality and sexually liberated. Addiction is a symptom of struggle, i.e. it is reactionary, not progressive. In short, people who are jerking off multiple times a day, or even once a day, and go on and on about sex culture and social darwinism, really are a bunch of dumb monkeys just thinking with their penises.

Is it odd to be in favour of pre-op, but against post-op trans?

>all parades are degenerate

Objectively wrong, doofus

Not really. There are even a lot of trans people who feel the same, and don't want the surgery (not because they don't want a vagina, but because they don't want the current results of a "vagina")
This is even more true in the case of FtMs, because while the constructed vagina isn't really all that bad if you go to a good doctor (although expensive), FtM srs dicks are absolutely horrible, in terms of aesthetic, function, and feel.

t. tranny

Homosexuals should be able to marry but adoptiom should be a big no.

Why not? There isn't anything completely solid out there that says it detrimental

Sexuality should be a strictly private thing. In an ideal world, you may be addicted to voyeurist bestiality scat videos and there's literally nothing wrong with it as long as you don't share your horrible take on sexuality with others. This is why I'm against anything related to the lgbt movement and, at the same time, against the persecution of the lgbt collective.

Your sexuality should not define who you are, either in society or inside your own mind. This is because humans will always judge and demonise some practices, and hate those who are different (what they perceive as different enough to be hated may be variable though). Concluding, absolute privacy is what would de facto erase any sexuality related problem. Even exhibitionists would be satisfied since they always can work in porn.

All are immoral.

None can be even justified as long as my previous relationship with a young girl is demonized. while politicians and the wealthy run child sex trafficking rings.

My argument for Exhibitionism and nudity is that we are already a very sexual species and it'd clear how much of one we are when you look at the way we put sexual references in EVERYTHING that only the most totalitarianly prudish of the repressed ever want to hide. It's not a bad thing, sexuality is good at catching ones attention and is a part of fundamental human nature. Censoring it jus make taboo what shouldent be and causes bizzare limits as to what can and can't be shown. The best example is breasts being censored dispite having no inherit sexual quality

It shouldn't.

I do agree.

>public nudity?
>Don't care

>He's never been to a nudist beach

>How do you feel about the LGBT movement?
Dislike it
>public nudity?
It's an affront to the senses
>Exhibitionism?
If you're into showing off, I couldn't care less. As long as no one takes offense.
>Polyamory? etc.
Degenerate, but not my problem.

This is bollocks. You only think you are an extremely sexual being because the corporate elite keep shoving sexual imagery down our throats. The 'i'm sexual being so that justifies being a degenerate' meme is literally just propaganda.

>You only think you are an extremely sexual being because the corporate elite keep shoving sexual imagery down our throats
Because we are sexual animals and that's why businesses use sexual imagry. How the fuck did you work out that people are pervert's because companies made us that way? If sex didn't work to begin with how does it now?

>sexuality isn't a core part of the human condition
it's not degenerate to be human

Your theory certainly seems to be working well the Middle East right now.

No, the "corporate elite" is "shoving sexual imagery down our throats" because people like it. Sex sells, and they're in it to make money.

I literally do not give a fuck about what people do to get off as long I am not involved in it unwillingly

>LGBT movement?
Can't stand it. Gay is fine. Pride is fine. Playing into victim politics is absolutely disgraceful

>public nudity?
Depends on what you mean by public. Personally I think notions of "modesty" have turned into general body shame. Its so fucking stupid when there's lines for the private booths in change rooms, or people wanting to wear clothes in a sauna. On the other hand I don't really want to see you wagging your willy downtown.

>Exhibitionism?
I don't really want to see you wagging your willy downtown. I doubt anyone else does either.

>Polyamory?
Eh. I can get peoples objections to it, social fabric and all that, but as long as it's consenting partners have at it.

>On the other hand I don't really want to see you wagging your willy downtown.
I can get that, but that raides the question. Is being uncomfortable around nude (or lewd) people a social construct or natural?

Cultural phenomena is a natural social behavour.

It's more social than natural. The natural component to seeing someone fucking near you is that it's intended to make you feel a little jealous, as a way to encourage you to spread your genes or secure breeding privileges over your mate. Those feelings have been mostly overridden by thousands of years of social conditioning that tells you it's disgusting, unhygienic, and immoral. For the most part, that conditioning is completely correct.

How is it correct?
I can see unhygienic but even then even with clothes people can be gross and all you have to do is wipe your ass good

>LGBT
It is good that people are trying to secure their social rights, something I want to help with.
>Public nudity
Eeh. I think that decency is important in a society, but I have no problem if people want to have designated spots that transcend this norm, like nude beaches.
>Exhibitionism
Is this not the same as public nudity?
>Poly
I am fine with it, although I know from a friend that they rarely work out well.

>No child is a homo, because children don't think about sex until they're older or unless they're forced to.
By that logic, everyone is asexual.

>Nobody except teenagers give eachother thumbs up for scoring cute girls, either
That's just not true.

Who are some gay people in history?

Tom Cruise.

>LGBT movement
Sodomy is immoral for the fact of how risky of a sexual behavior it is, and how it gives way to so much dysfunction- both physically and socially. But plainly, it's a misdirection of the sexual function. Akin to consuming rocks as a misdirection of the eating function.
>public nudity
Not sure how to feel about this truly. I'm leaning towards labeling it as depravity, as ones nude form, revealing all unique sexual characteristics respective to ones sex, should be reserved for their partner. When one reveals such traits, it has a suggestive connotation. Therefore when one is nude, it seems to be asking the world for sexual attention, which is depravity.
>Exhibitionism
same as above
>Polyamory
Disagree for the sole purpose that monogamy works better. Western civ wasn't built by a bunch of polyamorous barbarians.

Orthodox art semi-related, even though I'm not really a Christian.

>It is good that people are trying to secure their social rights,
why is it good

The ancients had no concept of "being gay".

You'd have to focus solely upon people in the 20th and 21st centuries when such a concept existed.

Julius Caesar

Gay guy here, I never had any event in my childhood that would really change me, I was not raped, I started thinking about sex until I was about 13-14, lost my virginity until I was 19... I just liked boys rather than girls. It just happened, nobody forced me into it, I just liked boys. When I was a kid I would just make my male action figures kiss for the lulz. I grew up in a loving catholic family with both of my parents, went to good school, never had any trouble in those schools. Today I am 20, I am a gay man, not feminine, I don't agree with the LGBT lobby, but I am all in for civil union and adoption.

What's your argument now?

If it becomes technologically possible at some point in the future (and it seems reasonably likely that it will), I think the human species and all its societies should be structured around artificial procreation, with all new humans having only a single gender and no sexual inclination. All new humans should be borne from artificial wombs, with intelligence and health optimised, and all features such as skin colour rendered purely cosmetic in nature.

I believe this would create far more harmonious and egalitarian societies. Any theoretical degeneration caused by sexual deviancy would be nonissue, given that any form of deviancy related to gender would have no potential to exist. With any luck, all forms of deviation and divergence, even those unrelated to gender, will also be suppressed.

Why do you hold that belief on polyamory? That's functionally sexual slavery, anathema to Western virtue.

You're a bitch.

Because now people won't be punished for something that doesn't matter.
Why is it not?

Is sex with protection a misdirection if sexual funcion? Is masterbation?

To follow up on this user's silly utopia, I only half-jokingly believe we would achieve world peace if all humans were extremely attractive dickgirls. There simply would not be anything to be upset over.

I believe only men should be promiscuous, women should be monogamous and have no say in who they wed.

Women that do lose their virginity are treated like shit and fairgame to any man, they are also not allowed to have children nor can ever be married.

A man can be nonvirgin and not marrried because before marriage he goes through fun women then decides and picks out his wife WHO WILL BE A VIRGIN.

Virgin means the woman has not:
sucked a dick
had anal
done oral
had vaginal
kissed a guy or woman on the lips
rubbed a guy's crouch
suggestively touch a man

The wife is the property of the husband, she is no allowed to look sexual unless it is for her husband, fools that try to break the system via degenerate fetishs like cuckolding will be beheaded and their wives no longer virgins will be sold off as whores for men to fuck to their heart's content as is the case for any non virgin non married female in the society.

If the man's wife has died he is allowed to get another one whether, but the only exception is that the woman lost her virginity to her husband and husband is dead.

If the new wife has kids, they will be killed and the husband will replace them with own kids, either that or he will fuck the daughter of his wife and keep her as a sex slave.

This is what I honestly believe, plz dont try to moralfag at me either.

Are you actually an autist?

No I see man as the master and woman as the slave, I dont believe in this romance and soulmates horseshit.

A woman is the slave of her man, and must obey her man, that man could be her father, brother, uncle, or male cousin, it doesnt matter men are automatically better than women because we are the master gender. Women are subhuman shit that should be used to produce new humans or pleasure dicks that is all, dont give them jobs, dont educate them either just train them to be nice good house workers for their husband.

Also a husband can rape his wife anytime he desires.

Did this guy really save the war in europe?

probably just a muslim