/simg/ simulation games general

>YS flight sim
may as well play ksp
>entirely custom planes
>procedural wings and control surfaces
>clickin cockpit
>tgp, cameras wherever you want
Considering that all flight sims are at least 80% fictional, ksp at least gives you the most options. Not even one [not implemented] or [not functional] shit.
Ill never get over the lack of taxi cams on airliners in xplane.

will anything be getting that shit?

For 15 bucks they should be slapping it on absolutely everything.

FUCKING RETARDED FAGGOT

WHY DID YOU BOTHER CREATING THIS IF YOU DONT EVEN USE THE PASTEBIN ??

YOU FUCKING CUNT

YOU MISSED THIS
>Autism corner
mega.nz/#F!348iRBxC!UwZ7fEhKS8ASAGRYKSHzeQ

also no one will buy the harrier with the hornet close to release, that would be retarded

Dogfighting star destroyers in my WW2 era submarine has never been so enjoyable before

>implying the hornet isnt going to be a buggy mess with a billion unfinished features
Ill have one harrier thank you

Party like it was 1995

>he's too poor to buy two planes
I really sometimes pains me to know that most of the flight simulation community flips burgers for a living.

Nah NEETs waiting for enough autism bucks

>with the hornet close to release
somebody tell him

maybe we just dont want to give money to those lazi fucks

and this too.

>he thinks he'll still be getting autism bucks by the time the hornet comes out

what's the point if the harrier can't hover and fire weapons like in my animus?

i seriously hope there will be a special option to allow shit like that

... game mode?

Rearm and refuel at FARPs, while the enemy has to fly all the way back to an airfield.

Wow that's actually quite broken in a blueflag environment.

>razbam not releasing unfinished buggy messes
>lets buy useless shit just to waste money

i'd sad to know the sim community is made of low iq mulattos

Not really. It's accurate.

Its sad to know that there are no good sims.
Harrier is a million times more fun than the 18. Also, who the fuck knows how much it will cost, they implied it will be more than 60. And they will probably sell the ship bundled with a shitty map for +60$.

Aerofly FS forgot to add a flight model

uhhhhhhh bms fags?

There's nothing worse than arrogant sim devs who think they know it all and turn down qualified help.

where did they state it's gonna be 60+ ?

also other than vertical takeoff the harrier is boring as fuck
>no sead
>only mavs + dumb bombs + LGB
>slow
>no air/air or ag radar

its basically a vertical takeoff a10

>literally posting reddit

fuck off discofaggot

>no sead
Nope, its got some anti radiation missile nobody's ever heard of called the AGM-122

>clearly I can ignore this because I don't like where it came from

i guess its gonna be useful against aaa at best

Eh, it'll be more fun than just lobbing it off on some HUD icon with no risk

>clearly a random comment without any source provided is to take 100% seriously

Boy, the Russian side in Blue Flag is going to suck after the Hornet comes out.

cant wait dood, the bitching n moaning is gonna be ebin

Oh well, I guess they could counter it by liberally handing them more s-300s, or something.
I'd really hate to see them give the plane to both sides, though.

There's really gonna be no reason to fly anything but the hornet when it comes out. At least as capable as the F-15C in BVR and much more capable than anything in WVR.

Until the Eurofighter comes out.

how could I forget

let's not die yet

The harrier is one of my most sought after modules but I don't trust RAZBAM

I didn't buy the M2000 because that box on the left side of the cockpit has a weird perspective like an idiot modeled it

And they seem like a dopey FSX group run by old men

Just look at the MiG-15 or the F-5E and how sleek it looks compared to the M2000

Vatsim ops on XP11 gonna be lit, lads

Dude what, the M2000 looks arguably TOO sleek already. As if the cockpit was painted on.

SOON

>lets buy useless shit just to waste money
heaven forbid anybody that plays flight simulators actually likes airplanes

...

>single 12mm fired from gunner hits your german plane
>engine damaged
>multiple HE 20mm shells land on il2
>do damage
>paint falls off
>pilot still fine
>gunner still fine

nice to see i was right from the start, this game is still a more biased version of war thunder without the hud
:)

Baguettes away

It's probably a latency issue. The damage models are usually pretty good for that game

yes, if you're russian shooting at a germ that is

>Project """"""Reality""""""""""
>Squad

>arma

SO I'm flying TARCAP for some Vipers and instead of actually blowing up the SA-11 they engage artillery while flying right over the target area and then they get killed. I know DCS missiles are shit but is the AI just retarded and does not know what stand-off strikes are or is it actually the AGM-88 that has shit range in DCS?

Also, fuck my wingman.

Anyone getting some modules this sale?

slave teh seeker head

>ARMA

In the MiG-21 campaign there's a mission in which you provide Cover for a strike package of coalition A-10C attacking a rebel compound. The compound is adjacent to a hostile boarder defended by S-300's

Your job is to defend the package from incoming 29's, and their job is to blow up the rebels. Mission failure if the Hogs get shot down.

After the compound is destroyed, what does the AI logically do next? Switch to attack the nearest hostile unit. THE S-300s!

I guess I'm not even going to bother then.

Gotta wild weasel for them then, huh

Installing BMS feels unnecessarily complicated.

I think the people who make it actually hate newcomers. The forums are such a fucking pain in the ass

Well, I hope it's worth it because I'm shit at flying. I usually just play wargames like CMANO and so on.

why is the Huey 60 dollars

youtube.com/watch?v=MNo3VgSe86Y
>because it's good

Because it's amazing

>tfw arma is the hardest sim you've ever played

It says alot about ED that RAZBAM had to make their own AI assets.
>we're so tired of looking at ED's decade old bullshit that we spent time (read: money) creating something which we're going to give away FOR FREE, just so we don't have to soil our marketing images with that garbage.

Yeah that whole trailer is 2.5 env.

Plenty will buy the harrier.

Is harrier the first boom and zoom aircraft for DCS?

I hate the BMS install system. The fact that you need to install to install has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

Bmp

SWAT 4
W
A
T
4

But then jf-17 gonna turn the tables again.

I doubt it, but it would be nice to have a proper FBW plane that uses 1G at 0 stick pull rather than retardo Su-27 system

As if some cheap paki plane is going to be able to compete.

A modern plane will beat the shit out of cold war era planes.

As long as both planes have ARH or similar quality, it'll be about who has more wingmen.

yes

So in the gamefiles, the Mig-21 apparently has a different definitions for lock and launch on the SPO-10, at least for sound.

And boooring

what makes flying around supplies in PR so fun?

...

engine damaged doesn't indicate serious damage you know

What lies hidden beneath those warts?

sounds like something that there'll be a mod for pretty quickly

Is it fun enough to pay for?

no, buy BOS instead

I have BoS but that doesn't let me do bob up attacks from behind hills

If you don't have a helicopter yet, you're better off getting the Ka-50

Ka-50 was my first DCS module back in 200.......9, I think?

Has it really been that long? Christ.

every time I think we have it bad now I remember that dcs actually existed back then and how terrible it must have been