Tell me about this guy

Tell me about this guy.

Proposed a league of nations after the great war
Got show the fuck down by the Senate

Seems Trump won't be the first President to chase Mexicans around.

Łódroł Łilson was a duck.

He kept us out of war!
Well he didn't lie, he didn't say he'll continue to keep the USA out of war.

no darkies allowed basically

Proposed "Wilson's 14 Points", a treaty supposed to end World War I "without losers". No humiliation, reparations etc. (almost! white peace basically). However, he was rejected.

>France still mad about Alsace-Lorraine
>Entente defeat Central Powers and impose heavy regulations on them
>Treaty of Versailles nowadays regarded as being one of the reasons for World War II

tl;dr at least he tried

The 14 points explicitly says Alsace-Lorraine should be returned to France, and nowhere says anything about reparations. Unless you want to interpret the parts about Belgium and northern France being "restored" to mean their economic reconstruction, which would then authorize reparations.

he looks like my uncle

Very true. My point was that France did not just want AL back, it wanted revenge (should have made that clearer prob).
Wilson's planned restauration would of course cost Germany money, but seeing how the last reparations were paid in 2010 (those were postponed leftovers though) and the partial French occupation and ensueing passive resistance and hyperinflation, it is safe to assume that Wilson's plan would have settled the matter much more efficiently.
Last but not least, their territorial losses (especially in the east) made Germans super mad.

What a faggot.

>last reparations were paid in 2010
not reparations
debts
reparations were cancelled in 32 or thereabouts

only president to graduate grad school
probably the reason why most presidents don't

Went to his house once he had a prohibition era wine cellar and two black servants named, and I shit you not, Issac and Maria

>without losers
Austria-Hungary would disagree.

Globalist scum

Committed quite possibly one of the biggest diplomatic fuck ups in American history by fucking over Japan at Versailles because he needed Southern votes to ratify American entry into the League of Nations and couldn't even get that leading to Japanese hatred of the United States and Pearl Harbor. All because MUH GLOBALISM.

After a slow and grueling recovery from WW3 as globalism takes over, history will venerate him as being far ahead of his time.

The only mistake with Versailles is that it was neither harsh enough nor generous enough. The notion that they could have held onto the amputated provinces of Alsace-Lorraine while being defeated is hilariously selfish. Any and all pity and sympathy for poor widdle dindu Germany is void when one looks at Brest-Litovsk. The Russians did not rape and rampage through German territory and so there was no such rationale of vengeance to make the demands more severe.

>Fund and support Lenin to go and overthrow the Czarist regime
>Revolutionary government is eager for peace
>Initial Peace talks promise no demand of land

Then with Brest-Litovsk and their sudden demands on the Russians.
>Push Russia back to pre-Peter the great borders
>Central Powers get 1.3 million square miles
>62 million people, 1/3rd of the Russian population
>1/3rd of Russian arable land
>3/4th of coal and iron
>1/3rd of factories
>1/4th of railroads.
>6 billion German marks in reparation.

The reparations in pure monetary cost were far higher with Versailles but those can be forgiven while the state functions. Imagine if Versailles had all but Prussia and Brandenburg annexxed to neighboring states and it's closer to Brest-Litovsk.

Hell, omit the monetary reparations and the Germans would have cried about how cruel and evil it was to deprive them of their territory taken in the East.

Germany and Austro-Hungary were as imperialistic as the other European powers, yes. The Central Powers were in dire straits in 1918 (thousands starved because of the blockade) so their rediculous demands do have some context to them (they were desperate af).
Good for Russia that the Central Powers were defeated shortly after Brest-Litowsk.

"Hell, omit the monetary reparations and the Germans would have cried about how cruel and evil it was to deprive them of their territory taken in the East."
>de-armament
>sole responsibility for the war

There were good reasons for everyone to be unhappy with Versailles.

These debts were actually pending reparation-payment turned into private debts of some sort, afaik.

>it wanted revenge
Meme. It wanted security.

>Wilson's planned restauration would of course cost Germany money, but seeing how the last reparations were paid in 2010 (those were postponed leftovers though) and the partial French occupation and ensueing passive resistance and hyperinflation, it is safe to assume that Wilson's plan would have settled the matter much more efficiently
You realize that the French and the Americans agreed on the reparations bill right? It was the British, not the French, who wanted a higher reparations bill because they wanted to include pensions rather than just material damage.

Also, what was "Wilson's plan"? The Treaty of Versailles generally conforms to the 14 points.

>Last but not least, their territorial losses (especially in the east) made Germans super mad
The Polish corridor (Germany's main territorial loss in the East and the most controversial) is in the 14 points too.

Anyway, the Germans were butthurt about losing, they would never have accepted any peace no matter how lenient. The only practical thing to do was create a peace that would prevent them from every disturbing the peace of Europe again.

>sole responsibility for the war
It says Germany and her allies were responsible for the war, which is 100% accurate.

>There were good reasons for everyone to be unhappy with Versailles
Only the French had good reasons to be unhappy.

Prior to Obama, he was the worst president in American history. Now he's #2 worst president in American history.

I learned this in Middle School
I learned this in High School

I have this opinion now somewhat, Wilson was too idealistic and wonky with his policies. He made Versailles soften the edge of the final whooping France wanted of Germany, and he also tried to pull the U.S. into Europe into his shitty club Europe begrudgingly accepted later. Thank god it was not possible for us to actually lose WW1 and thank the Senate stopping the U.S. from accepting Versailles or the League.

I also think it's even more funny when you read about how he got elected in the first place. Roosevelt ran against Taft with the Bull Moose, dividing the Republican vote letting Wilson get a quick win.

t. alex jones

t. glenn beck

libertarian types think he is literally Satan, so he's pretty cool.

>fucking over Japan at Versailles
spotted the weeb. Japs didn't shit in ww1. they took tsingtao and a couple of irelevant islands in the pacific in the first year of the war, and then did fuck all until the end. they lost 5,000 men tops, the equivalent minor skirmish on western front. They got more then they deserved at versailles

Willson was hellbent on destroying Europe is what I gathered from his policies.

Crashing the West.

kek

Woodrow Wilson is exactly what happens when you put a pure academic in office. Everything on paper about what they propose makes sense in theory, but rarely ever plays out