ITT: undefeated generals

...

Did we had not the exact same thread last weekend? And the weekened before? And probably a lot of times before as well?

So, once again:
>only fighting against turks and the french at one of their lowest points during the Rev Wars
>defeated in the Alps
>directly responsible for Russia withdrawing from the war and thus the loss of the 2nd Coalition
He was a great general though, probably one of the very best russian generals ever. Only overhyped as hell.

...

...

he didn't defeat death.

The non autistic choice desu.
Literally not a single defeat, not even in a skirmish.

>Not even a Skirmish.
Uh technically, he did lose skirmishes in Baktria.

only because he ran away from napoleon like a bitch

You mean the disaster of Pharnuches?

...

...

>only because he ran away from napoleon like a bitch
Please tell me you're joking
This is a new low for this board

Didn't he die in like 1800? Before ever having the chance to meet Napoleon?

There were tens of thousands of Haitian "generals" in the aftermath of their revolution and the century to come. They didn't fight any wars, and so they were undefeated. How do white bois even compete?

This triggers the heretics

Let's not forget Horthy, the regent of a kingdom without a king and the undefeated admiral of a landlock nation without a navy.

>this triggers the papists

There were also a few in the Liberian civil war, like General bin Laden, General Butt-naked, General Mosquito or his arch-nemesis, General Mosquito Spray.

...

Napoleon and him were in Italy at the same moment
It's no coincidence if they never met

If we're not counting defeats

...

but we are you fucking retard

...

...

GOAT

Goat 2

Alexander wasn't in personal command at that instance. Spitamenes defeated a collection of the army that was undertaking independent operations

>implying Beauregard didn't lose Shiloh

>implying Stuart didn't lose Yellow Tavern (as well as his life)

You mad nigger

atleat chamberlain never lost

khalid bin walid

This kills the french

...

He had such a fucking easy job in the last year of the war, Thieu withdrawing all ARVN to Saigon

Why the fuck did he do that, was it just to hasten the inevitable?

This, the man was a machine

He lost like 80% of his battles, fuck are you on about?

was gonna post this

why is jizz foaming out of that horse's mouth

Undefeated in over 60 large battles!

Good general, very bad governor.

>General Bin Laden
The Liberian civil war was brutal but the names of the warlords never fail to make me laugh.

Suck it, Hannicucks
Altho Scipiofags would admit Hannibal was pretty good himself.

ARVN troops were basically collapsing against all NVA assaults by March 1975. Everything was going to shit, not much you can do at that point.

>Implying Tet wasn't a giant waste of men and materials for little physical gain.

Granted it turned out to be a turning point for US public opinion on the war, but that was an unintended consequence of a failure of an offensive by all measures.

...

Horthy was kinda defeated in 1918 actually

...

>what are the Seven Days battles

Lost at Second Petersburg (along with his balls)

>implying the Seven Days Battles were a defeat

Tactically all but one of them were, you can't possibly call Malvern Hill a Confederate victory. Also lost at Antietam.

Keep in mind that the Viet Cong did most of the dying at Tet, not the NVA. Cynical people have suggested that Giap wanted the VC out of the way.

Literally my idol

Tfw Scipio is my middle name, will forever be thankful to my dad for that

>Tactically all but one of them were

"Victory is not measured by losses Farid... It is measured by gains!"

*shoots down VTOL*

>Malvern Hill
>Antietam

Malvern Hill wasn't Jackson's call, it was Lee's. Same with Antietam.