Who's right?

>social policies of the Republicans

so you want kids to be taught in public school the Earth is only 5,000 years old and that evolution is a lie and that dinosaurs were put there by Satan to trick mankind?

I think you mean 6000

The Lion.

No, I want to teach them abstinence-only sex ed, why the death penalty is perfectly sensible, and how transgenders are weird golem-like things who will probably rape people if they're allowed to choose their own bathrooms

None of them. I think they're both equally shit

abstinence-only Fails

Not if you're trying to increase the white birthrate!

...

>implying it wouldnt just increase the mulatto birth rate

and also their percent of children raised by a single mother

As the old saying goes.

The Republican party is a party of bad ideas, and the Democratic party is a party of no ideas.

hahahaha

Trump is the left side. Look at his appointees for his transition team, they're all bog - standard republicans. All those idiots that voted for Trump because he's a Washington outsider are gonna be real disappointed with his term, but most of them will just ignore all the stuff he's doing and instead focus on how he brings masculinity back to the presidency or whatever.

Correction, they are disgraced bog standard republicans. But in terms of policy they're on the same page as bog standard republicans. Trump picked them not because they're the best, but because they can't stab him in the back like establishment bog standard republicans. So he's actually picking bog standard republican rejects that are worse than your average bog standard republican.

Republican Social Policies
>Everybody is equal before the law
>There are two genders, man and woman
>Citizens have the right to defend themselves and their property from criminal aggression
>Peaceful protest is protected by the Constitution

Democratic Social Policies
>Certain people need special treatment to compensate for things that happened 100+ years ago
>There are 200+ different genders
>Defense of self or property is racist
>Riots are considered acceptable forms of protest

Republican Social Policies
>There is only 1 god
>That god is Jesus
>He rules all
>He rules you
>He is you
>you

Republicans believe in three gods.

Republican Social Policies
>don't teach actual science in school because it will hurt my (((god's))) feelings
>ignore the Constitution and base all of our law on some scrolls written by sandniggers 2000 years ago halfway across the globe
>alcohol (addictive drug which kills 1000s a year) is fine but marijuana (non-addictive and kills nobody) should be treated like a dangerous substance
>please do not criticize our greatest allies Israel (pbuh) or Saudi Arabia is that is tantamount to treason

>Republican Social Policies
>legislating their own morality

Republican social policies

>if the president is a nigger, it's fine to encourage people to make target practice dummies in his image
> even if the fbi searches through tens of thousands of a woman's emails and says that they've found nothing to base any charges on, we should still send her to jail for something
> let's cut funding to public schools and cut taxes for public education, we need that new fighter jet

Republican social policies
>Slavery is NEVER okay because everybody has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness

Democrat social policies
>Yeah man slavery is totally okay. In fact it benefits all of humanity! I love slavery! *tries to secede*

Do you really think anyone falls for this on the history board?

>muh states rights, muh weak central governments

technically the republicans because they are the "right" wing.

Dem social policies:
>Everyone should be able to do whatever the fuck they want IF they're responsible.

Rep. social policies
>"life liberty and the pursuit of happiness" applies to fertilized eggs before people from other countries.

democrats legislate their morality more often these days just in different ways.

wow saying muh and then the thing you don't like is pretty legit man.

>Democrats never legislate their own morality onto everybody else

More legit than trying to pass off the "they were democrats" bullshit on the fucking history board. Let me summarize the position of the confederacy one more time, since you seem to have misunderstood my post:

>muh weak central government
>muh states rights

Now, which party in the US today really values those things? Hmmm, I wonder. It couldn't have been the whigs, could it? Oh wait, they're not around anymore. Oh yeah, it's the republicans.

Where's the legislature, senpai?

I MISREAD SORRYYYYYY

>The Confederacy was about states rights

It was tho. States rights to slaves.

How is the civil war not about states rights?

youtube.com/watch?v=6a7nHdTwu7Y

Normally how this discussion goes is

>the civil war was about slavery
>no, the civil war was about states rights

And then you read the declarations of Secession and the constitution of the Confederate states of America, and you realize it was specifically about states rights to own slaves. I'm gonna remind you one more time that this is the history board, and the history of the civil war is pretty well-known here. But since you're the expert, why don't you tell me what the civil war was about.

>Butt-hurt confedo-cucks detected

Sherman is an unsung american hero. People always remember Grant and Lincoln, no one remembers the school superintendent who warned the south they were gonna get fucked if they fought, and then fucked them. Rest in peace, big Willy Sherman.

>no one remembers him
Not only was the most famous American tank ever made named after him, his very name triggers southerners to this very day.

>his very name triggers southerners to this very day
this. they also admire his ruthless tactics and believe they should be implemented in the Middle East against Muslims.

>but muh m3 lee