The Carter phenomenon

proof?

How has Hugh Hefner not gotten lung cancer by now?

Maybe he has. But remember, smoking doesn't guarantee you'll get lung cancer - the majority never do.

Immunotherapy/Warburg's metabolic treatments have been called quackery by the medical establishment ignoring research and clinical evidence:

>Coley's Immunotherapy suppressed for 100 years
>Arnott's cryotherapy suppressed for 100 years
>Warburg's metabolic approach suppressed for 90 years
>adjuvant hyperthermia has been suppressed 100 years
>invivo tumor lysate vaccine suppressed 100 years

>Photodynamic therapy suppressed for 50 years

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Coley

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1888599/

Amygdalin/Laetrile has been called quackery by the medical establishment ignoring research and clinical evidence:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4703354/

many cancer pills with great safety profiles and amazing effectiveness get shelved for non-scientific "corporate" reasons

Bromopyruvate - shelved
Tamoxifen gel - shelved
Etacstil - shelved

Minimally Invasive Breast Cancer Cryotherapy Largely Ignored in U.S.
breastcancer-news.com/2016/03/29/breast-cancer-story/

your clinical trials are purposefully extended/delayed/drawn out to have urgent cures postponed for 30+ years

penicillin and aspirin would not be available to the public if it would have received the modern clinical trial treatment

there are 100s of examples

I think it is early treatment more than anything. Presidents basically have doctors probing their assholes every week looking for the slightest problem and they probably continued with this after their time in office.

If you have a mole or something get it checked out.

>your clinical trials are purposefully extended/delayed/drawn out to have urgent cures postponed for 30+ years

tamoxifen is a great example.
tamoxifen was around in 1960 for breast cancer, Europe was using it

but FDA only approved tamoxifen in 1998 for early and advanced breast cancer, after millions of dead

cryoablation has been around for 100 years in treatment of various solid tumors

Japan, China, Europe have been using cryoablation to treat prostate, liver, breast and other cancers since the 1960s

but FDA only approved cryoablation in 1998 only for prostate cancer

still awaiting approval of cryoablation for breast cancer, even though it has been practiced for many decades

Japanese doctors since the 1960s even rput metastatic breast cancer into remission with cryoablation

nope

see

these eugenicist elites show up with late stage metatstaic cancers and get them cured, not even picked up early

meanwhile doctors shove you plebs in the chamber of death and say it is your time to die, we have no curative treatments for you

>would you be able to survive all that with your healthcare?
Obama is my healthcare.

Holy shit what a classic crock of conspiracy theory bullshit. Have you ever talked to any medical researcher not from a YouTube video?

How about 1 peer reviewed double blind study or meta analysis?

You have no idea what good evidence is and fall for blatant bullshit because it 'feelz' right.

Guess what - every elite has eventually died. Children, siblings, parents and friends of elites die every days. Medical research from thousands of different independent institution and money sources is done by millions and trained and educated researchers - oh, but it's all suppressed right?

Fuck off, stop posting and read a book

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3878396

link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00206003

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3897620

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5026630

posterng.netkey.at/esr/viewing/index.php?module=viewing_poster&pi=107875

hindawi.com/journals/grp/2016/9251375/

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3592690

press.endocrine.org/doi/full/10.1210/endo.138.9.5358

benmay.uchicago.edu/page/news-archive-year-2005-GW5638

books.google.ca/books?id=U4LcAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA364

also wtf are you butthurt about? cryoablation/cryoimmunolgy? be specific with your anal fit returd

thanks

so these treatments have been stalled/shelved/abandoned for decades

why and how did the FDA approve the non-therapeutic, risky and lifethreatening, sex reassignment surgery and therapy as a standard treatment for those gender dysphoria mental disorder?

why and how did the FDA approve the risky and lifethreatening, non-therapeutic circumcision of male infants as a standard treatment in newborns?

Unwilling parents are even persuaded by doctors to have non-therapeutic circumcision of their newborn male children.

and why does the FDA deny, reject, and disapprove of life-saving, therapeutic cancer treatments that are practiced in other countries?

this just in: modern medicine comes from a long tradition of eugenics more news at 12

Mate if the FDA in its current form existed in 1953 we wouldn't have a polio vaccine

It costs billions of dollars just to get a fucking drug approved by the FDA

you could be sitting on the literal cure to cancer but you would never get it to the public because you'd go broke trying to jump through layer after layer after layer of red tape

>penicillin and aspirin would not be available to the public if it would have received the modern clinical trial treatment

Lots of shit wouldn't be available to the public if it received the modern clinical trial treatment

We wouldn't have

>Aspirin
>penicillin
>polio vaccine
>most antibiotics
>INSULIN
>tesosterone
>pretty much any drug developed before 1960

>Holy shit what a classic crock of conspiracy theory bullshit

kys reddit

this

Metformin has shown to have amazing anti-cancer properties since the 1970s (Warburg effect), even Watson (DNA guy) uses it

after 40 years of prolonged/delayed studies still no sign of oncological establishment acceptance, although every study shows benefits

same with cryoimmunology (abscopal effect)

there are literally 100s of cases like this, your medical establishment want you dead

Rich people get access to better medical teatment than the plebs.

Do you really want to live in a world where everyone is made to live into their 90s? That's not sustainable. Just because effective treatments exist doesn't mean it's a good idea to let them be accessible to everyone.

Medicine is all about making money. This will cure to many people to cheaply and cancer treatment is a huge money maker. Immunotherapy has been around since the 1800′s.You will wait a lot longer for it to become general treatment.

Immunotherapy historically has involved all arms of the immune system in experimental treatments. That includes not only trained white blood cells, but B-cell antibodies and T-cell antibodies. In some experiments they attached poisons such as ricin to kill the cancer cells.Indeed most anti-cancer drugs can theoretically be attached to antibodies to kill of cancer cells specifically.Most approaches have had miraculous cures and remissions of hopelessly ill cancer patients who were dying.They are not offered to people who have no other hope except as small treatment studies.Why? Oncology is a big medical business with eugenicist/nazi foundations, to cure it outright would put Oncologists out of work and blood sacrifice.The giant pharmaceutical companies that sell super expensive drugs would lose great gobs of money.They have some of the biggest lobbies in congress to maintain their business.

Today they have the means to put in genetic switches which will simply turn off the T-cells or any other cell line, by turning off the genes responsible for the action.One such switch is being produced by the company Intrexon using the insect molting hormone ecdysone to stop and start the genes of any organism.There almost certainly could be analogous techniques to biochemically create similar results if we understand how this one works.
yall be dead and gone a thousand years before any of this is cheaply available to the general population.

tl;dr the gas chamber become the radiation chamber

The medical establishment is a joke
It's a miracle they even treat and research cures for AIDS patients. If AIDS wasn't such an acute, noticeably degenerative disease, it would get ignored like lyme disease.

I'm so sick of the overpopulation maymay
The third world is the problem, not the first world

There was a woman with CFS(caused by some weird virus) who cured herself by injecting her blood into chickens, then eating the eggs of those same chickens. The chicken would make avian antibodies, which she would get through the egg

translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https://newsaboutdisease.wordpress.com/2016/05/28/det-gar-att-bli-frisk-om-an-med-primitiva-och-udda-metoder/&edit-text=

January 2016 marked the 45th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s State of the Union Address (January 22, 1971) when he officially declared war on cancer.

He promised Americans that he would begin “an extensive campaign to find a cure for cancer.” He said, “The time has come in America when the same kind of concentrated effort that split the atom and took man to the moon should be turned toward conquering this dreaded disease.”

It sounded great. After all, just a couple years earlier we had put a man on the moon. The computer language BASIC and the first handheld pocket calculator were introduced. The vaccines for polio and mumps were developed. The first human-to-human heart transplant was successfully performed. In 1971, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was invented and genetic modification of organisms was introduced. It seemed reasonable that, if we really focused on curing cancer, it could be accomplished. But it didn’t happen.

Forty-five years later, the primary treatments for cancer remain surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

I can tell you from personal experience that it’s almost impossible for a cancer researcher who thinks outside the box to receive government funding. It can take years and a small army of individuals constantly completing mountains of paperwork to receive funding.

Nature-based therapies practically have no chance. And to have any hope of receiving funds, a researcher all but has to prove – before getting the funding – that his or her efforts will be successful. As such, the research continues to focus on minor variations and/or tweaks of the same types of treatments that have been used for decades.

Sadly, it appears that many in the conventional medical community now feel that living with cancer is the new normal. Rather than focus on curing it, they think it should be managed with the use of drugs, radiation, and other therapies.

In 1957, the first results from a clinical trial of the diabetes drug metformin in patients were published. Yet, it would take nearly 40 years for the drug to be approved in the United States as a treatment for type 2 diabetes.

The breast cancer drug tamoxifen ( around since 1960 ) was largely ignored by the US, in the following decades after its initial development, Tamoxifen has been around for treatment of breast cancer , outside the US. Tamoxifen was prohibited for treatment for early breast cancer in the US, until 1998

"Tamoxifen was born into a world of indifference in the '60s, when the focus of the research was
on contraception. It grew up in the 70s, in a world where chemotherapy was king and hormonal
therapies were perceived as non-starters in the quest to cure cancer. "
Craig Jordan. (1)
When I was 22 and am now 64 -my mom was diagnosed with bone and breast cancer. My family was into natural. Mom had a simple mastectomy which was 40 years ago. I found an article at the time in Esquire that was titled DO I FIGHT OR GIVE UP. There was a hospital in Bonn Germany. I sent her there with my dad. They looked at her records and said they could help. They put her on tamoxifen - which was illegal in the USA at that time. The FDA and I went through battle when it was opened by them. You think I was having Cocaine sent to me. I smuggled them through Canada after that. They also gave her liquid vitamin - I am not sure it was K or A. She never had chemo of radiation. The doctors in the USA gasped when it showed all cancer was not present. 21 years was a miracle.

cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,78351,2.htm?mid=584566#584566

It took the US more than 30 years to permit tamoxifen for breast cancer patients

Catching cancer early does drastically improve your chances of survival while your proof is circumstancial.

well tell that to Carter and Reagan who had multiple metatstatic (late stage) cancers cured

also
any metastatic patient knows that doctors put them on pallative (pain relieving) care and just wait for them to die, administering radiation bursts for the quick kill

>even Watson (DNA guy) uses it
Watson is notorious for believing in all sorts of baloney, probably because he did only basic science his whole career and doesn't know jack shit about clinical research.

He is not an authority in anything but basic science.

>standard archaic care

ahh yeaahh

Dr. Modan worked with various types of cancer, and in 1974 demonstrated that the chances of getting cancer increase for anyone who has had X-ray dosages as low as 1.6 rem.

and why archaic radiation when there is proven HIFU and other superior ablative techniques?

Years ago the lumpectomy was considered risky and unproven, a fate breast cryoablation now endures as concerns about safety and effectiveness delay cryoablation’s adoption. However, the past twenty years has seen the lumpectomy plus radiation replace many mastectomies

We seem to have this thought, that because its 'current year', and we live in modern times that we must know everything; I am sure past generations thought the same way.

As recent as the 1950s, a doctor named Hatfield was known for his 'radical mastectomies'. At the time they had no understanding of cancer being able to metastasize the way it did, so they figured 'lets just keep cutting out as much we can until we got it all' simple and stupid way of thinking.

It took women protesting and putting up a fuss about that sort of treatment, in which they didnt want to be left horribly disfigured anymore. Literally no one does radical mastectomies anymore, because everyone agrees it is barbaric. Only 50 years! But now we have 'modern treatment options' right? Now we got it guys! The fact is the treatment options we have now are still stupid, but yes its all we got, I know. Just dont bash others for wanting to search for alternative methods to aid in their own health, cuz ultimately its their decision and no one elses.

2 Nobel Prize winners: Warburg & Watson
VS
1 shitposter on a chinese dick riding blog

fun fact: Watson is over 90yrs old and still making moves in the industry

>archaic "gas chamber" treatments

surgery causes latent recurrence of breast cancer: An inconvenient truth
The theory in that article was that DCIS is dormant, until awoke with surgery. Once active, it can invade and wreck havoc.

Surgery (which can spread the cancer), Chemo (which may or most likely may not kill ALL of the most virulent invasive cancers) 1 and Radiation (which can both cure malignancies and also induce second primary tumors and chromosome aberrations).

Rather than destroying tissues in bulldozer fashion as do the traditional chemotherapy and radiation treatments, there are finer minimally invasive ablative techniques combining immunotherapy and Warburg treatments tissues that have been suppressed for 100 years

>archaic
1800s saw the birth of mass communication as well as modern oncology.

The radio, telephone, radiation therapy, and oncological surgery were prevelant 100 years ago.

100 years later, you have, for as little as $50 anyone can purchase a handheld, portable, flat device that features high-definition color display, FM radio, internet access, telephone communication, music playback, live audio/video conferencing, streaming, recording, gaming, word processing, GPS, camera and other advanced capabilities.

100 years you have: Warburg, HIFU, cryoablation, RF ablation, photodynamic therapy, laser ablation, MWA, immunotherapy all being neglected

and just use the same rusty, old chemo/radio

interdasting!

immunotherapy was considered a scam 100 years ago by American medical establishment, who succeeded in destroying Coley's Immunotherapy, which cured 100s of cancer patients

not surprisingly, you cant suppress the truth and after 100 years of failed radio/chemo, science is now revealing the true miracle of this immunotherapy containing proven immunostimulatory CpG, same with Warburg

>IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

this

only Bush, Reagan, Carter, Hitler, Ford, Soros, Kissinger, Heffner deserve to be cured of cancer and artificially extended to 93 years of age

everyone else should be sacrificed to moloch via the radiation chamber

Doctors want more freedom to practice
70% of doctors consider professional autonomy to be one of the most important elements of proper patient care

doctors are strongly dissatisfied with levels of freedom to chose the prescriptions, treatments and procedures that are best for patients
Many doctors feel that government regulations unnecessarily hinder their treatment options.

doctors are in favour of the complete abolition of government regulation of prescriptions of medicines or procedures providing those medicines and procedures conform to established norms regarding safety and side effects.

that's what he's saying you fucking idiot

Carter was diagnosed in 2015 and his treatment was approved for the public in 2014.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pembrolizumab#History

Reagan's colon was under close observation before the cancer was discovered. They probably did probe his asshole every week as I said.

doctorzebra.com/prez/g40.htm

>A 1984 proctoscopic examination disclosed a small polyp in Reagan's colon. Biopsy showed it was benign. In March 1985, another polyp was found
>He underwent endoscopic removal of the polyp and colonoscopy on July 12, 1985
>Colonoscopy disclosed a second, more dangerous tumor -- a villous adenoma

Apparently extreme precautions were used.
>The right-sided portion of Reagan's colon was removed -- about 2 feet of length.

This 1979 study shows that the survival rate is quite high. Skin cancer is low risk also.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1397248/?page=4

>>standard archaic care
>ahh yeaahh
How old a procedure is and sarcasm have no relevance scientifically.

>1.6 rem
A chest x-ray is 0.01 rem, every year you are exposed to 0.62 rem

HIFU, ablative techniques, chemotherapy and other techniques all have their advantages and disadvantages. Chemotherapy can be very effective for some conditions.

annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/12/1798.full

If you are skeptical of the government you should be equally skeptical of people trying to sell "herbal cancer cures" and the like. Contrast this with modern medicine which is intentionally exposed to scrutiny from scientists all over the world through peer review.

you left out a few critical facts

you left out that 90+ year old Carter had deadly metastatic (late stage) cancer and was cured

however, the cure is not for the plebs, younger metastatic melanoma cancer patients get told by doctors very bluntly that it is their time to die and only receive palliative care

you also left out that Reagan got cured of prostate, skin, as well as colon cancer in his ripe old age, "lesser humans" in this situation get told to just give up and die by doctors

"Many other celebrities and even European royalty have gone to Germany to get rid of their cancer. Celebrities such as Liz Taylor, Suzanne Somers, Anthony Quinn, William Holden, Red Button's wife, and European royalty, Princess Caroline, chose Germany’s kinder, gentler treatments."

"Why did President Reagan choose Germany? Because German cancer doctors are the best — thanks to breakthrough treatments the American cancer establishment calls “quackery.” " Surprisingly, these treatments cost 10 cents on the dollar compared to America’s dreadful treatments.

As one of Germany’s top doctors said, “Doctors give chemo, chemo, chemo, and patients die, die, die.” That describes American cancer treatments. German doctors use a whole new way with NO hair loss, NO nausea, and NO disfiguring surgeries."

freegrab.net/Reagan's cancer treated in Germany.htm

His wife, Nancy, persuaded him to undergo laetrile treatments. Learning of a reputable alternative provider who worked with laetrile through his close friend, future Oregon Senator Mark O. Hatfield, Reagan received daily IV laetrile treatments in the Oval Office over the next thirteen months.

cancercaremalaysia.com/2014/01/29/how-ronald-reagan-healed-his-colon-cancer/

Dr Hans Nieper cancer clinics or hospitals in Hanover, Germany?

encognitive.com/node/7498

Dr Hans Nieper who cured Reagan is considered a quack by US establishment

>rich people can afford better treatments and are more likely to be cured
What a mystery OP.

FDA officials sneak off to Germany for the treatments they deny you

Back in 1987, Dr. Nieper let a man named Jeff Harsh interview him for a video documentary. After commenting that “President Reagan is a very nice man,” Dr. Nieper declared:

“You wouldn’t believe how many FDA officials or relatives or acquaintances of FDA officials come to see me as patients in Hanover. You wouldn’t believe this — or directors of the American Medical Association (AMA), or American Cancer Society (ACS), or the presidents of orthodox cancer institutes. That’s the fact.”

Well, that’s America’s cancer establishment for you.

FDA officials and their colleagues want you to submit to disfiguring surgery, poisonous chemo, and burning radiation when you get cancer. But when they get cancer — well, that’s different! They go to Germany to get rid of their cancer. For themselves, they prefer treatments that are more effective and don’t have any side effects.

germancancerbreakthrough.com/B/

Radiation therapy is over 100 years old and is officially "archaic", not to mention dangerous and risky. Technology and medicine has advanced tremendously to provide safer, more effective solutions,

Interventional radiologists have the skills and tools to ablate solid tumors successfully with necrosis-inducing ablation techniques, resulting in the abscopal effect; but are not permitted to practice minimally-invasive curative treatments due to draconic, oppressive misanthropic policing by authoritarians.
Well over half the radiology scans he looks over were unnecessarily ordered and don't turn up anything.

It's the liability. Hyperchondriatic physicians order way to many tests and scans for everyone. It costs a fuckload of money, wastes time, and hurts patient care. A very significant fraction of non-skin cancer cases are probably caused by unnecessary x-ray and CT scanning.
>It's estimated that for one woman's life to be saved through mammography, 2,000 women have to be screened and 200 will get a false positive. False positives usually lead to biopsies, which remove a tiny piece of the questionable tissue for further tests. But 10 of 200 women with false positives will undergo unnecessary surgery.

>"Surgery or needle biopsies may cause a local inflammatory or wound-healing reaction, which increases cancer risk," or "the extra radiation from the workup for the false positive could increase breast cancer," said Love. "Or we might be picking up on some subtle change in the microenvironment, the fibrous tissue, that's more conducive to cancer growing. We just don't know."

It's not that out of the ordinary, actually.

Life expectancy statistics are skewed by people who die young through violence or accident. Among people who make it to 65, roughly half will live to be in their 90s.

If there was a cure for cancer the government is smart to keep it secret. Can you imagine what would happen if the third leading cause of death in United States were magically removed? Cancer sucks but it still serves as a valuable population control tool.

>skeptical of people trying to sell "herbal cancer cures"
>utilizes herbal remedies in chemotherapy, ridicules herbal medicine as traditional, archaic
>ridicules traditional medicine, but professes archaic and antiquated chemo/radiotherapy is superior

chemotherapy is herbal medicine at its worst, and we are skeptical of it:
Madagascar periwinkle (Vinblastine, Vincristine, Vindesine, Vinorelbine)
Yew (taxane)
Chinese Happy tree (Camptothecin)
Wheat (Thiopurine)
Mandrake (Etoposide, Teniposide)

instead of applying chemo in neanderthal, caveman brute force fashion, medical practitioners are reluctant to follow a modern approach utilizing targeted therapy by injecting chemo/immunotherapuetic agents into ablated/necrotized tumor, thus avoiding the harmful affects of chemo toxins on the entire body

US covers up short life expectancy by importing millions of elderly immigrants from China, Mexico, India, Asia etc...

if the US were not practicing this, it would reveal a massive die-off of the native population

here is a useful insight on this matter
>retirement age
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/98939908/#98958884

My rich-ass uncle went to Germany for cancer treatments

I guess this explains it. Why does the FDA not approve the drugs germany uses?

>force people to save for retirement by paying for medicare and retirement savings
>the sheep work to death, while the elite pillage the savings of the sheep
>pension payouts avoided

the molochic system will only suppress and sabotage any progress

force people to work until they die

has to do with blood sacrifice, which relates to moloch and masons and shit

the authoritarians are suppressing as much as they can to increase chaos and suffering

Tesla + Jesus wanted to change this, but you did not listen

you do realize that the elites will sacrifice you to moloch with the rest?

here is how the moloch system works:

>harmful shit gets the benefit of the doubt
>harmless curative shit gets the burden of proof which is drawn out 100 years until all red-tape is cleared

what gets approved:

>deadly products GMO, smoking, 1000s of carcinogenic chemicals in your diet

>harmful and dangerous, non-therapeutic circumcision, sex reassignment surgery etc (see
)

>bruteforce and deadly chemotherapy/radiotherapy
what gets suppressed and rejected:

>minimally-invasive, effective, curative treatments with great safety profile

it took 100 years for the authorities to acknowledge that smoking is harmful to health

it will take 1000 years for the authorities to allow minimally-invasive, effective, curative treatments with great safety profile

The Hippocratic Oath, the core guidance to a physician’s conduct, states famously: “Do no harm.”

In the case of suppressed treatments (cryoimmunology, 3-Bromopyruvate etc..), perhaps the Hippocratic Oath has to be interpreted differently. It is possible to do harm by inaction. In the case of a patient suffering with cancer who is presented with the possibility of an agent like 3BP, which has few side effects, perhaps doctors ought to consider that they may be doing harm to their patients by blocking access to this medicine.

>HIFU, ablative techniques
in Asia, Europe, HIFU, cryoablation is indicated and practiced with great success for ablation of solid tumors since the 1990s

in US it is not indicated, except in certain limited situations. it took US 20+ years to finally permit HIFU for prostate cancer recently

If your doctor will not appease you by looking into this, find a doctor who will. Chemo makes the doctor $13,000. Per dose, so if your getting rchop or bcnu...chemo, they rake in around $50,000. Per patient! Look around that chemo lab at all the faces, then count how much money that lab is raking in. Compare that to the cost of a sure cure that costs about $100.00 per six months. Get the picture?

>breaking the oath and code of conduct

A large part of the regulations are codified in the Professional Code of Conduct for Physicians

Free Profession – Not a Business

The model code of conduct codifies the most important duties of the physician. Some of these relate to ethics and
morality, i.e. that the doctor is obligated to carry out his profession in a conscientious manner. Paragraph 1,
Section 1, Sentence 1 stipulates that the medical profession is not a business but a free profession. That means that the
main objective of the physician may not be devoted to generating the largest possible financial profit but to healing patients and safeguarding public health. Accordingly, physicians may never be bound by the directives of non-phy-
sicians in connection with medical decisions. Even though there is growing competition among physicians, the profes-
sion is not designed to maximize profits

>Former President's get better healthcare than the average person.

They have the money, means and influence to bypass standard procedure and obtain superior quality healthcare. This is how the world works. Get over it.

But it shouldn't be the way the world works

the world also works with violent riots and uprisings to overthrow those that oppress, sabotage, and commit heinous crimes against humanity

the social contract has been ripped apart by the authorities, will the docile finally realize this?

"For some reason modern medicine has itself turned a corner and entered a darkness and is now committing crimes against humanity unequalled in the history of our race."
--Dr. Non Eugenicist

>the world also works with violent riots and uprisings to overthrow those that oppress, sabotage, and commit heinous crimes against humanity

Only to have a new ruling class come into power doing the exact same things.
The only way to stop it is to either somehow create the fantasy world of perfect equality where no man is above or below each other not only in privilege but influence and respect, or to ensure that all medicine is now free from human bias. Which is impossible.

the "revolutions" in question are anything but, just one clan attempting to replace the ruling position of another, retaining the same authoritative, centralized systems, the old system is still kept, with symbolic tweaks. oppressive power is derived from centralization

true revolution is decentralization and dissolution of authority

so the only option is to accept our servile, sacrificial role to moloch?

do you think you will be the lucky one to escape the sacrifice?

If they stopped suppressing and actually taught more practical cures at University, instead of how you can get a free trip to Hawaii for prescribing whatever Fizer is selling, more people might not needlessly suffer........

it is simple, all that needs to be done is to stop the oppression of patients-- abolish draconian regulation and authoritarian oppression of medicine

there are millions of medically oppressed who are denied their human rights, a few become medical refugees seeking treatments in Germany or countries that provide freedom from oppressive treatments

the world saw a civil rights mov't which elevated the rights of minorities

when will the civil rights mov't succeed in elevating the rights of oppressed patients and medical refugees?

>when will the civil rights mov't succeed in elevating the rights of oppressed patients and medical refugees?

ask Soros or the Pope

>true revolution is decentralization and dissolution of authority

Leaving a vacuum of power to be filled by a new power to replace it.

>so the only option is to accept our servile, sacrificial role to moloch?
>Being this delusional

There is no secret sacrifice to be had. Simply put the powerful wish to live just as much as the rest, and they have the means to make it so.

M8, me gran's not an elite and she was born in 1924

They live off of the blood of dead babies.

What part of "elite" don't you fucking understand?

>Sentence 1 stipulates that the medical profession is not a business but a free profession. That means that the
main objective of the physician may not be devoted to generating the largest possible financial profit but to healing patients and safeguarding public health

When asked to defend drug prices, the most common answer from a drug company spokesman is that pricing is a “very complex process.” Usually this rhetoric is used to refute accusations of price-gouging. The argument is that what looks like greed, is actually the result of exhaustive efforts and research. “Research and Development” could be an apt description for how a drug giant like Pfizer maximizes their prices.

One of the most common reasons that are used to justify new drug prices are high the costs of research and development.

this portrait of a drug price describes a kidnapper figuring out how much the hostage is worth and what they can get paid so it won’t bankrupt the people paying the ransom.

>There is no secret sacrifice
lurkmoar newfag

>>harmful shit gets the benefit of the doubt
>>harmless curative shit gets the burden of proof which is drawn out 100 years until all red-tape is cleared

I've never been able to put into words this shitty system we have. le """"peer review"""" and """burden of proof"""" are only applied to things that threaten the status quo.

Elites are rich and have access to everything they need to stay alive.

a manager had the final stage of lung cancer and had 4 pints of liquid pumped from her lungs. The molochist hospital said she was done for and they prescribed the wrong pain killers. They went to a special cancer clinic and paid $10000 for a pill. She's now alive and back at work. I think they're just trying to kill off the poor and making more money maintaining than solving cancer.

Oh Well - I sure wish people in this country would get tired of the Feds protecting big PHARMA and show some class and heart. A lot of babies, momma, daddy/s daughters and son will be dying this year and next. My question to you is why? if 3BP worked for us why not others? why do american people behave so nice when 164,000 of those nice folks will die at the hand of clinical trialsm drugs that dont work, big pharma and suppresion. WHY? oh - I see its becuase I might be crazy? now thats a new twist! but sorry its not the case and thank god I was smart enough to run from pharma and institutions taht support them.

Sorry you wont fight them sorry for all those babies you let suffer sitting on your ass being good little citizens

People acknowledged smoking was bad for your health when it was first imported.

But that doesn't matter if you don't live to reach your long end life estimate from a healthy life.
If people die like flies at age of 30-40

Once the worst shit of modernity was dealt with, like smug, people started reaching ages of 50-60.
Once 70-80 is normal, you reach the area where smoking might kill you, because you live long enough for the long term damages to actually stack up.
To compare it:
There is a reason things like Prohibition didn't roll until the 1900s, even if the issue's that lead to the trend where around a lot longer.
It far less a issue to die a drunkard, if that means you die at normal age.
Its start becoming a issue where you have people dying of long term alcohol damage in their 50s, and people live past 30, so their drunken stupor really can get prolific.

In the 1920s scientists showed that cigarette smoking caused lung cancer.[224] Which resulted in no governmental ban on smoking.

In the UK and the USA, an increase in lung cancer rates was being picked up by the 1930s, but the cause for this increase remained suppressed. Decades followed of suppression of truth, unsuccessful attempts by victims to sue the companies and government protecting the interests of the tobacco mafia.

After 7 decades, and millions dead, the tobacco mafia in the United States has suffered greatly since the mid-1990s, when it was successfully sued by several U.S. states. The suits claimed that tobacco causes cancer, that companies in the industry knew this, and that they deliberately denied the legitimacy of their findings, contributing to the illness and death of millions worldwide.

The industry was found to have decades of internal memos confirming in detail that tobacco (which contains nicotine) is both addictive and carcinogenic (cancer-causing

There have been multiple court cases on the issue that tobacco companies have researched the health effects of tobacco, but suppressed the findings or formatted them to imply lessened or no hazard

yet compare the benefit of doubt towards deadly tobacco with the prolonged, bureaucratic burden of proof for modern, elegant, non-brute force, safe, cheap cancer cures

>But it shouldn't be the way the world works

Why not?

if the FDA is hellbent on introducing harmful shit, how come life expectancy is still increasing

checkmate atheists

weak bait

atleast come up with more believable bullshit

there were anti-tobacco laws 100 years ago to protect the health of the public

in 1900s, Germany initiated a strong anti-tobacco movement to protect public health [2] and led the first public anti-smoking campaign in modern history

by importing elderly immigrants
also congo-tier life expectancy in the US

see and
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/98939908/#98958884

>by importing elderly immigrants
i take it your gramps doesn't visit you in your basement.

In 2010, more than three in eight (.25 percent) U.S. adults ages 65 and older were foreign born, a share that is expected to continue to grow. The U.S. elderly immigrant population rose from 2.7 million in 1990 to 4.6 million in 2010, a 70 percent increase in 20 years.

>how come life expectancy is still increasing
>there is no doubt the US president's (elites) have achieved a longevity baseline of 93 years of age

is the life expectancy 93 years of age?

old elites miraculously escape all ailments, sicknesses, and statistics of their compatriots

>old elites miraculously escape all ailments, sicknesses, and statistics of their compatriots

Prove it. If true, that should be easy.

start from here

because nazism and eugenics was defeated, no?

>10 guys lived into their 90s

What do you think this is proving?

>nazism and eugenics

What are you talking about?