>Muh secret club This board is too strict. discussions on recent facts should be accepted. >B-But /pol/ That board is full of shit and it's called political INCORRECT, that doesn't seem the place to discuss certain themes. This board is called History & HUMANITIES so recent happenings should be allowed. >Yoi are gonna ruin this board!!! No I won't. If mods still gonna ban lowtier discussions and trolling nothing is going to shit. >Meta-Board threads go on /qa/ Who and what board does that? Every board has at least a meta-board discussion on his cataloug
Notice me MODS
Joseph Fisher
We shouldnt discuss recent events, even if you dont want to go to /Pol/ you can go to /news/ or /int/
Zachary Jackson
Why not? That's not history or HUMANITIES?
Blake Cooper
Yeah, but thats what happened to /b/, it became only porn because of the excuse of >why not if it is RANDOM? We should discuss Humanities in a less political or "recent" way.
Andrew Gray
The greatest benefit of studying history is to learn about the present. I think that discussion of current topics from a historical viewpoint should be allowed.
Colton Reyes
>HUMANITIES Humanities is more denoting that you can also talk about subjects in the humanities, like archaeology, psychology, performing arts or other liberal arts and sciences. It does not mean the board is a pol-lite free-for-all to discuss current events.
Hudson Rivera
(OP) >HUMANITIES >Recent events
You don't know what humanities are do you?
Fuck off. If you want real political discussion, make /pol/ great again. Or discuss it in /news/.
Ryan Richardson
>historical viewpoint keywords, but the thing is that, when discussing so, the trend is to discuss the "current topic" rather than the historical elements.
Adrian Ortiz
Gotta say I'm genuinely mad we can't discuss the Kosovo war (a historical event) because of the dumbass 25 year rule but vague shitposting and asking Jaden Smith-esque questions is free game because LE HUMANITIES. Humanities have to go.
Alexander Gray
Seee? Present events are fucking important, I don't want this board to become pol-lite but don't be so strict with the fucking rules
Josiah Thomas
I just want humanities to fuck off. Look at this: hiw is this even allowed here? It shoukd be merged with Veeky Forums.
Ethan Young
...
Liam Rogers
Too much religion, /pol/, liberal faggots and other bullshit.
It was great when it first launched and was historical /k/.
Dominic Russell
Talking about some sociological phenomena is alright, thus some things that are contemporary. For example discussing economics, or the horrid transformation of the western "liberals" will surely have some discussion about current events. If you allow that you'd basically get /pol/ and/or /int/ without flags. A bunch of people larping as their country. While i wouldn't say it's poorly janitored, i'd say it's still not enough, when you see threads with the same premise and same picture pop up every other day (and i'm tired of seeing Marx, Princip, Zhukov, Hitler etc.) Not like it isn't discussed on this board. People generally bring it up in Yugo threads.
Daniel Ortiz
>We shouldnt discuss recent events, even if you dont want to go to /Pol/ you can go to /news/ or /int/
While I’d like a board for (somewhat) serious discussion and /hist/ would be the place for it, I have to agree with you.
Sadly, /pol/ is too fast moving and peppered with too much shitposting, while /int/ is a teenage wasteland of ignorance and /news/ stupidly imposed a “no opinion pieces” policy, that pretty much limits it to discussing the fucking weather (in addition to a retarded home page).
Cameron Anderson
Everyone here is a crossposter, let's see:
/pol/: easiest to spot on Veeky Forums as they start yapping about niggers and Jews even in a completely unrelated thread, will get booty devastated and call you a kike when they encounter disagreenent
Veeky Forums: pseudo intellectualism, pretend cultural elitism and a condescending behavior towards anyone without a humanities degree, aggressively buttblasted about STEM posters. They're the ones always posting about Zizek, Chomsky, Nietzsche, Stirner etc.
/int/: biggest retards around, low IQ, nonstop posting about the number of inventions, size of empires and other country dick measuring contests like they're still on their homeboard
/leftypol/: cancer, will start endless threads about Marx and Rosa Luxemburg and send everyone who isn't a communist to /pol/, despite all their content being recycled /pol/ memes
/k/: weapon posters + Rhodesia memers
/gsg/: shitposting, memes and vidya autism, sadly the most actually Veeky Forums related posting on this board though
/r9k/: any bitching you see about women and it's bound to be these guys
Jacob Russell
we need a Politics board ffs with strict moderation to keep the /pol/ shits at bay.
Robert Kelly
>a true politics board has never been tried
Cameron Gomez
Out of all of these i want /int/ to fuck off the most.
Josiah Flores
/k/ doesn't talk about historical wars or general strategy enough, I wish Veeky Forums would do it more, but because of the groups you cited chiming in, Veeky Forums has kind of fell from that good "night /k/" talk.
Tyler Scott
>& HUMANITIES so recent happenings should be allowed If anything you prove this board should have an IQ requirement
Samuel Long
i've only been here for 4 years
Nathan Morales
There is a politics board user, just happens that crazies and borderline shizos have a penchant for political stuff
Connor Garcia
>This board is too strict.
You're supposed to provided "credible source material" with your arguments. Hardly anyone does this, 'cause how do you cite memes?
"Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated," somehow doesn't apply to the three holocaust denial threads posted per day.
Not supposed to discuss the contemporary consequences of historical events, no worries just pretend your thread is alt history.
No discussion of "current events or popular culture," just pretend your interested in humanities and make your "reddit atheism h8" thread anyway.
Matthew Hall
Sorry to hear that
Jaxon Miller
>/k/ doesn't talk about historical wars or general strategy enough
It used to be pretty good for it, at least when /k/ included military history. Was also harder for armchair generals to bullshit with the number of veterans to call them out.
Easton Cook
this filename is way too detailed
Jonathan Butler
>Wanting to bring /pol/ to Veeky Forums coz /pol/ is shit What a moron
Xavier Young
You are right, Veeky Forums used to have all those shit but noooooooooooooo hiro wanted a new board
Jordan Cox
/And Humanities / was a mistake
Samuel Murphy
You forgot Veeky Forums: On topic posting, often citing actual books
Isaiah Jackson
Thanks but no thanks, we have enough low quality threads as it is , no need for more just because you don't get your replies on /pol/
Brody Green
Talk about history or get out. /thread
Elijah Lopez
NO. FUCK OFF. & humanities was already a mistake, the 25 years rule is the beat thing here. The rules are great as they are now. Go shitpost on another board, what you are proposing would transform this one into shit.
Brayden Turner
>That board is full of shit and it's called political INCORRECT, that doesn't seem the place to discuss certain themes. This board is called History & HUMANITIES so recent happenings should be allowed.
There's one change to make, which is splitting off religion or philosophy into a /rel/ or /phil/. You're kidding yourself if you think opening Veeky Forums up to /pol/ topics will do anything but invite more /pol/ here.
>No I won't. If mods still gonna ban lowtier discussions and trolling nothing is going to shit.
>be less strict! >stay strict tho!
Christopher Phillips
sorry
Dominic Campbell
*best thing
Ethan Ross
>It was great when it first launched and was historical /k/. Low quality threads and juvenile jingo, thats why military history threads are a red flag here.
Joshua Miller
>not mentioning /twg/
Brandon Gray
daily reminder that this board was shit from day one
Jackson Baker
I'm not even a Veeky Forums regular, but please, this place is patently better than /pol/
Logan Price
>the three holocaust denial threads posted per day. Veeky Forums's Overton window has become so fucked by pol that the mods buy holocaust denial as a normal viewpoint.
Noah Reyes
Fun fact, in many European states this can have legal consequences, especially funny if some retarded rightwing nutcase spergs out on twitter or FB. >two clicks and you have him in for a couple thousand € in legal fees.
Lincoln Walker
>discussions on recent facts should be accepted. It already is, however current politics aren't part of it unless you frame it in such a way that it can be discussed in an academic manner. That's not a hard thing to do. All it requires is you having above double digit IQ and don't half-ass it as "Histicially,...". Humanities isn't codeword for "my opinion".
Jaxon Parker
I think we should expand the 25 year rule to a post-2000 rule. As it stands important events like the Yugoslav wars, the Congo Wars and most of the events surrounding the disintegration of the Eastern bloc are technically not allowed. I also think the mods should actually be stricter if anything on the count /pol/ and /int/ tier threads are an epidemic.
The mods here are far too lax.
Chase Gutierrez
>The mods here are far too lax. Bring back the terror!
Ryder Hernandez
>The mods here are far too lax. they are just strict enough. We have the occasional /pol/ thread and that's it.
Andrew Perry
>Yugoslav wars top /pol/ material no, thanks.
Adrian Bailey
You can basically discuss them without any repercussion. Recently i made a post about transitioning economies and linked some articles and graphs, mostly about difficulties some former communist countries faced while others didn't.
Cameron Moore
also ww2 threads should be banned
Dominic Hughes
>the occasional /pol/ thread
Landon Jones
>occasional /pol/ thread lol
Hence why we need stricter mods. Ban the /pol/ shitters. Allow the historical discussion.
Jeremiah Nelson
>military history threads are a red flag here
kys senpai desu
Owen King
he's right tho
Christopher Thomas
I for one would like to propose we ban the roach.
Henry Parker
His shitposting is at least mostly funny.
Adrian Powell
>this place is patently better than /pol/
no /pol/ is better overall given size, Veeky Forums has only issue select superiority.
Daniel Perry
new Rome thread when
Wyatt King
I fucking hate /int/
Ethan Reyes
>discussions on recent facts should be accepted. >That board is full of shit and it's called political INCORRECT, that doesn't seem the place to discuss certain themes. that's why you'll fit in.
Ian Walker
butthurt STEMfag detected. tell me again about objective utility and purpose.