70 percent of british men share king tuts DNA

uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801

EXCUSE ME A MOMENT

...BUT WHAT YOU ESTEEMED GENTLEMEN AND SCHOLARS APPEAR TO BE SUGGESTING IS....

Other urls found in this thread:

uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801
humansarefree.com/2014/09/king-tut-was-eastern-european-according.html?m=0
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

W

E

But user, 99% of british men today are brown muslims.
Checkm8 crackers.

Fuck ancient Egypt and everyone who has a raging hard-on for it.

W

So this is fine but when I point out that 60% of Finns share King Ruriks(founder of Russia) DNA I get memed?

Baseless speculation.

He was a Berber.

U

Tutankhamun was spanish

Okay? All you need is one Egyptian dude to come over during the Roman Empire and have children.

Z

I would really appreciate source.

Interestingly, a cockroach shares 70 percent of human dna.

>two worthless species share DNA

wow surprising

No

Then get cancer you americunt piece of shit I'm glad niggers are killing you.

>My nation? America. My heritage? Doychland. Le death to britannia!!
Pathetic lads.

Well, I'm not American, so I don't care.

You're doing Gott's work mein bruders

PHARAOS

...

Uh, no. 100% are. 70% are related in this very specific way.

You are so unbelievably retarded and so are those retarded sensationalist journalists

I just found the source but I'm not gonna tell you because you're a cunt. lol

>70 percent of british men share king tuts DNA
that pic makes it painfully obvious

Literally Celts. Indo-European chariot culture went far and wide.

AYE LADDIE, WE WUZ RIGHS AND SHEEIT

100% of human beings have African heritage.

Really makes you think.

I see what you did there, user. Thanks! Though the one I found has her as white.
Retard.

It was probably an edit made in one of those browning threads.

>uk.reuters.com/article/oukoe-uk-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUKTRE7704OR20110801

"Geneology center."

Literally just a paper written to drum up hype for their pseudo-scientific business model.

King tut has no descendants. Nobody is a descendant of King tut.

We share 60% of our DNA with Bananas.

100% of British men share a banana's DNA.

>We share 60% of our DNA with Bananas.

How is that quantified? The human genome is five times larger than the banana genome.

Isn't the particular r1b clade more common in middle-eastern men? Also Ramesses III belonged to the haplogroup e1b1a.

Sensationalist head line.

This obviously means that the ancient Egyptians were of Anglo descent

We were royalty and such oi m8 I'm telling you I swear on me mum

our blood la

that's rather meaningless.

100% of americans share DNA with fruit flies.

go to Hbrowse, go to the queen category, and it is the 8th one. sorry, I can post the link without being marked as spam

Your welcome bro, lucky I have some experience

This article is very misleading

King Tut had ydna R1b like many Europeans but it's simply a paternal marker and there are African subclades as well

c l i c k b a i t

915122/7eaeead9cb/

if you don't spoonfeed the retards they will starve

>all these butthurt libtards getting mad nordicism is being proven more and more right by the decade

>brits
>nords

>birthing hips on a man (i know some of you guys would love this)
>club foot
>fucked up teeth
>inbred as hell

Truly, he was British in every way.

bow down to our British overlords

I don't understand what you have against spoonfeeding. Knowledge is not more valuable just because you actively searched for it.

Tutankhamen had only two stillborn daughters. Are you implying....

>muh human superiority
Humans ~20,000 genes
Bananas ~35,000 genes

Most large plants have more genes than animals
Most insects have more genes than mammals

thicc

WE

...

This.

...

It's almost as if geneticists are focusing on the groups of genes which differentiate us from each other within our species instead of the ones which regulate basic things like cell function.

The Eternal Banana at it again.

T H I C C

humansarefree.com/2014/09/king-tut-was-eastern-european-according.html?m=0

Island slavs confirmed

>Tutankhamunovic was a Serbiam warlord who drove the Croat and stink turk out of our lands

>Tutankhamunovic
jej

Osiris is a Serb
And he will guarantee us a good harvest

...

AYO HOL UP

>Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.
Looks like modern day Egyptians weren't even kangz and sheit.

SO U BE SAYIN

>and everyone who has a raging hard-on for it.
Ancient Egypt is one of the few historical cliches that I'm actually fully in favor of. You have to remember that Ancient Egyptian civilization developed ~3500 BC or ~5500 years before our present time. That's just insane, when Egyptians were building cities and even pyramids the rest of the world was literally just emerging from the caves, as Egyptians were developing either the first or the second ever human civilization.

I want to see what happens next keep going pls