When will the next communist revolution come

Absolutely impossible

...

Deep feelings of sexual inadequacy

Last I checked the US supported both Saudi Arabia and the Muhajadeens in Afghanistan.

I mean those stinger middles somehow made it from American arsenals to the hands of the Muslim fighters shooting down hinds.

I'm no Communist, but Regan and congress had their head up their ass about who the real enemy was.

Hint, it was the people flying planes into our buildings.

Bonus issue: Had East Germany still be around they wouldn't have a Muslim immigration problem today.

>the Mujihadeen did WTC

This is literally as stupid as FOX news watching boomers thinking Saddam was responsible.

It was the Saudi Arabians, OK?

Many of the Mujihadeen's were also Saudi including Osama.

Coincidence.

Either way the west was supporting the Islamist that eventually turned on them when the Soviets went away.

Would 9/11 happened if the Soviets were still around and still owned Afghanistan?

Or would all those angry Muslims be flying planes into the Kremlin instead of ours?

You're much more likely to get something like National Socialism than Communism. Communism doesn't have the unifying structure it needs to take hold in the US.

This. Facebook tier knowledge really. Not even mentioning most mujahedeen ended up fighting AGAINST the Taliban and al Qaida.

Yes, this stupid meme needs to die. The Mujihadeen mostly became the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance. The people who formed the Taliban were mostly sitting around in refugee camps in Pakistan during the war against the Soviets. One of the generals who took Kabul for the Taliban in 96 was actually a former Minister of Defense in the Communist government lol

...

Yeah those moderates in Afghanistan did a great job keeping the Islamists out, just like the moderates in Syria.

Inferiority complexes and the overuse of black cocks in porno.

Do you get triggered seeing all those black cocks when you just want to fap because you can't get laid otherwise?

Checked. Anyhow, hopefully never.

Nice try at moving the goalposts to avoid admitting your ignorance

Friendly reminder that a Catholic-Communist alliance would be unstoppable in destroying secular liberalism forever.

I'm not moving any goal posts shit turd. Its known that the Islamists won in both Syria and Afghanistan until we were forced to deal with them.

We thought driving out the original baddie was a good idea only to find out that Isis and Taliban were worse than both Assad and the Soviets.

That's not moving jack shit in goal posts.

It was a bad idea then and it was a bad idea now.

>that picture
so the retards at lit are just as stupid as the retards here with the added benefit of being left wing extremist too?

>It's a communists scramble to find excuses for why capitalism managed to save itself again crisis

Oh wait that's every fucking "capitalist crisis"

>Veeky Forums
>iq of 178
>supports BLM

Please

>this is what brainwashed proletariat actually believe

Yes and every one of those crisis solved through Keynesian economics.

You do realize what a massive contradiction that ideology would be?

>Egonomically gommunis
>bolitically an socially islamic
weres the comtradiction my comrade brother?

mini tank girl is CUTE

Marxism-Leninism is not the only form of communism.

Hopefully never.

>the people elected a goverment to seize the means of production
>socialism

But that is wrong. Socialism is when the people seize the means of production.

Never

Muh no true communism

What you need to understand is that it's really fucking hard to get to communism.

The right would be a lot closer to the mark if they spammed "communism is unreachable" instead.

Kek, are you even thinking while you're typing?

>I-It's not real because the p-people didn't rise up and take the means of production!"

It's almost like electing a government to do that for you is more efficient than overrunning the current government and setting up a new one that functions exactly the same

It will die, unless Star Trek replicators will be invented.