Will multiculturalism lead to anything except massive ethnic conflict?

Will multiculturalism lead to anything except massive ethnic conflict?

it's interesting how most rightists nowadays are really keen on showing off individual blacks/non-whites who share their opinions; they obviously do this to show that they're totally not racist, which is eventually just another sign of the total leftist hegemony over the discourse

You do realise most white "supremacists" just want their own ethnic states, like Israel, right? Nobody unironically wants to gas everybody who doesn't look like them globally.

Except the leftists do the same thing.

You didn't answer OP, you just whined about him posting a picture of a nigger

Fuck off

It will lead to a race war eventually, not even memeing. Separate countries would save a lot of headaches.

Doesn't have to.

Multiculturalism is about diverse cultures coexisting peacefully together. Suspicion, hate and intolerance are its kryptonite.

Unfortunately, there is a lot of that going around right now. But, it doesn't have to be that way.

Ideally, it leads to a massive right wing backlash and closed borders across the industrialized world.

Actually, I've come to the conclusion that the conflict is mainly over-hyped by extreme right-wing retards, something which I used to fall for.

In fact, I believe multi-racialism was going quite well pre-9/11 and since multi-racialism is brought to the forefront of people's minds since it is more discussed, more people start to pathologically associate it with all their ailments.

This is obviously beneficial to the rich elite who wish to divert the poor man's attention from the literal Billions they don't pay in tax which force governments into more borrowing and debt and less government spending on infrastructure.

(to be clear, I used multi-racialism as OP said "ethnic conflict" which is different to "multi-culturalism")

ethnic conflict is part of the origin of most actualy multicultural societies, historicaly there are few cultures that can be described as 'multicultural' that didnt arise trough mass conflict and exploatation along ethnic and religious lines, trough many generations, often in the context of imperialist and/or colonial or economic expansion, or situations of mass migrations and exoduses

take any example of a 'multicultural' culture anywhere, the balkans, north or south america, carribeans, whichever part of asia, australia, where ever, especialy good at generating multuculturalism were empires, corporations and religious conflicts

there are very few examples of societies where different cultures got mashed together without the different populations in question respectively getting segregated, subjugated, exploited or partialy exterminated, even if the roles often interchange trough generations, even if eventualy states of stable homeostasis are reached and the thing works for a while

the way contemporary ideological conception of multiculturalism is supposed to work is that different populations from different cultures are all equaly accepted into one basic monoculture template, one political social and economic setup, and then just cooperate in maintaining it, keeping their stupid superficial idiosincracies like somekind of identity basis that prooves they are being affirmed and treated as equals, but realy they are suppose to become truly equal by fundamentaly just getting on with the programe, integrate as consumers and ''''skilled labor'''' and become just another generic group of tax and loan paying citisen

any possible conflict or problem is to be treated with a outwardly expressed attitude of complete tollerance and enthusiastic acceptance, censoring all problematic information trough political correctnes and all sorts of damage control, and negating all negatives trough constantly pounding peoples brains with ideological language, but realy dealing with the problem in cold buerocratic and legal terms, police methods and simple 'technical barriers' logic, basicaly making the system to treat all human behavior as if it were the behavior of animals in a zoo, and ensuring whatever happens the basic political-economic set-up keeps on working and the population is under control

in other words in multiculturalism you dont have a problem with the people living next door, youre not supposed to get into spontaneous human behaviors and potentialy risk a conflict situation, youre equaly forbidden from showing any animosity at all, what you do instead is you call the cops and get the state to deal with it

Before the turn of the millennium everybody apart from blacks used to pretend to be white. Persians, Hispanics, Sicillians, Turks, they all used to try to be as "passable" as possible, then they realised there was more gibs and societal oppression points in being their respective minorities.

Ironically Israel is one of the closest examples of a repressive fascist state in the West

They freak out over their own Arab citizens having the right to vote

A complete coincidence I know

another major thing that happens as a side efect of contemporary multiculti ideology is spontaneous segregation, which isnt the plan, its a spontaneous human reaction to the multicultural system, its at the same time a basic element of the multicultural reality and a defence mechanism against it, as well as basic human behavior, grouping up with ones own, so since the multicultural sociaty cant do meltingpots, since that would mean infringing and appropriating stuff and enforcing asimilation and whatnot, it ends up being a mess of enclaves, ethnic, religious, social, so that it all becomes even more atomised and alienated than before, all while keeping with and cooperating in the basic capitalist monoculture template, which now integrates all layers of society into one bland mass fully serviced by and serving the economic set up either as worker or debitor or even on social credit. but always as consumer

one of the veirdest facets of a multicultural society as it is envisioned today is precisely that it is realised trough the members of said society rejecting it in any way they can

You can have a multi-ethnic state, but not a multi-cultural one. I personally would never live near Tyrone and Latisha who blast music until 2 AM, invite over two dozen friends every weekday, and don't take care of their property when instead I could live near George and Linda who conduct themselves cordially and actually do things with their children instead of letting them run wild. George and Linda, even though they're black, share a similar culture with me, and thus it is easy for us to get along. Tyrone and Latisha do not, and thus there is friction.

At that point, you cannot expect peace between two parties; either one must adapt the other's culture wholeheartedly, or the distance between them must increase. I do not have any tolerance for someone who parties every night loud enough to keep me up, or who's kids think it's ok to grab stuff out of my garage before I get off my shift for the day because the parents don't see anything worth correcting. So instead, I opt for hate.

If you want to explain how I can handle that situation while both of us retain our cultural identities and without someone leaving the neighborhood, go ahead.

I don't get leftists who accept that peoples' natural ethnic tension is being exploited by the rich, but equally think this natural thing can magically be turn off once we achieve le revolution.

So you overthrow the 1% and achieve your glorious multicultural multiracial harmonious utopia, what now? Do people just magically love each other now?

I'm a neo nazi and I love Israel, we should ship all the Jews there. If we could go back though I'd prefer they be given a less controversial state like Madagascar or Uganda.

Sowell is a hack

think youre largely talking to people in your head there

This is the most REDDIT post all fucking day.

Multiculturalism has been demonstrated to increase your """""""""kryptonite""""""""" (what a pathetic use of super hero jargon). People are less trusting and feel less secure in multiculti areas.

most post revolutionary societies go trough periods of 'cultural revolution' that usualy have the function of leveling everithing out into total monoculture trough assimilation and integration or culturocide, genocide, purges etc... thats why multiculturalism is never a problem in a system created trough political revolutions, cultural and ideological hegemony is implied from the start, and if you look at any marxist country in reality homogenity and uniformity were pretty much the basic thing, assimilation and integration were by decree, no communist society was ever multicultural, but the same goes for france for example, or even america